Molecular Nutrition

Effects of Coated Acidifier and Small Peptide Chelated Iron and Their Interaction on Laying Performance, Egg Quality and Serum Biochemical Parameters of 38- to 44-Week-Old Laying Hens in Summer

Expand
  • 1. Collaborative Innovation Center of Hunan Livestock and Poultry Safety Production, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China;
    2. Omega Biotech Shanghai Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201203, China

Received date: 2016-11-18

  Online published: 2017-06-07

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of coated acidifier and small peptide chelated iron and their interaction on laying performance, egg quality and serum biochemical parameters of 38- to 44-week-old laying hens in summer. A 2×4 factorial completely randomized design was adopted with 2 supplemental levels (0 and 300 mg/kg)of coated acidifier and 4 supplemental levels (0, 0.04%, 0.08% and 0.12%)of small peptide chelated iron in the basal diet. A total of 576 healthy Lohmann pink-shell laying hens (38-week-old) were randomly allotted to 8 groups with 6 replicates of 12 hens per replicate. The hens in groups A, B, C and D were fed the basal diet supplemented with 0 mg/kg coated acidifier and 0 (control group), 0.04%, 0.08% or 0.12% small peptide chelated iron (the content of iron was 0, 60, 120 and 180 mg/kg, respectively), and those in groups E, F, G and H were fed the basal diet supplemented with 300 mg/kg coated acidifier and 0, 0.04%, 0.08% or 0.12% small peptide chelated iron (the content of iron was 0, 60, 120 and 180 mg/kg, respectively). The adjustment period lasted for 1 week, and the experimental period lasted for 6 weeks. The results showed as follows:1) coated acidifier and the interaction of coated acidifier and small peptide chelated iron had a significant effect on Haugh unit (P<0.05). Total egg number in groups B and H was increased by 4.57% and 4.45%, respectively, compared with control group (P>0.05). Egg shell thickness in group F was significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05). Feed to egg ratio in groups B and H was significantly higher than that in group G (P<0.05). Haugh unit in groups E, F and G was significantly higher than that in group D (P<0.05). 2) Coated acidifier had no significant effects on serum biochemical parameters (P>0.05). Small peptide chelated iron had significant effects on serum calcium, phosphorus and iron contents (P<0.05). The combination of coated acidifier and small peptide chelated iron had significant effects on serum total cholesterol, calcium and phosphorus contents (P<0.05). Serum alkaline phosphatase activity in group D was significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05). Serum total cholesterol content in group H was significantly lower than that in groups B and C (P<0.05), and was decreased by 15.48% compared with control group (P>0.05). Serum calcium content in groups B and F was significantly higher than that in group E (P<0.05). Serum phosphorus content in group C was significantly higher than that in group E (P<0.05). Serum iron content in group C was significantly higher than that in control group and groups E and H (P<0.05). In conclusion, adding 0.04% small peptide chelated iron alone or combined with 300 mg/kg coated acidifier are beneficial to improve the laying performance, egg quality and serum biochemical parameters of 38- to 44-week-old laying hens in summer.

Cite this article

LUO Ling, QU Xiangyong, HAN Qipeng, PENG Yudong, PENG Canyang, CAO Dongmei, SUN Anquan . Effects of Coated Acidifier and Small Peptide Chelated Iron and Their Interaction on Laying Performance, Egg Quality and Serum Biochemical Parameters of 38- to 44-Week-Old Laying Hens in Summer[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2017 , 29(6) : 2108 -2115 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.06.033

References

[1] 呙于明.动物免疫营养[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.

[2] 何国茹,姚军虎.营养因素对肉鸡肠道黏膜免疫的影响[J].四川畜牧兽医,2011,38(6):29-31.

[3] DEHGHANI-TAFTI N,JAHANIAN R.Effect of supplemental organic acids on performance,carcass characteristics,and serum biochemical metabolites in broilers fed diets containing different crude protein levels[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2016,211:109-116.

[4] 罗玲,曲湘勇,韩奇鹏,等.酸化剂对畜禽胃肠道作用和免疫机理的研究进展[J].饲料博览,2015(10):49-52.

[5] NRC.家禽营养需要[M].9版.蔡辉益,文杰,杨禄良译.北京:中国农业科技出版社,1994:28.

[6] DANIEL H.Molecular and integrative physiology of intestinal peptide transport[J].Annual Review of Physiology,2004,66:361-384.

[7] 苏纯阳,董仲华,香红星.微量元素氨基酸(小肽)螯合物的研究应用进展[J].饲料工业,2002,23(1):15-18.

[8] 罗玲,韩奇鹏,曲湘勇.氨基酸螯合铁在猪和家禽生产中的应用研究进展[J].饲料博览,2015(12):35-40.

[9] 文杰,蔡辉益,呙于明,等.NY/T 33-2004鸡饲养标准[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2005:11-12.

[10] 刘井宽.蛋鸡产蛋期间死淘率高的原因及防治措施[J].养殖技术顾问,2013(10):25.

[11] 田玉民,袁晓春,李洪峰,等.夏季稳定蛋鸡生产性能的营养学措施[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2004(8):26-27.

[12] BESS F,VIEIRA S L,FAVERO A,et al.Dietary iron effects on broiler breeder performance and egg iron contents[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2012,178(1/2):67-73.

[13] 唐圣果,曲湘勇,张丽,等.甘氨酸亚铁对绿壳蛋鸡生产性能和蛋黄中铁沉积量的影响[J].中国饲料,2012(24):21-23.

[14] PAIK I,LEE H,PARK S.Effects of organic iron supplementation on the performance and iron content in the egg yolk of laying hens[J].The Journal of Poultry Science,2009,46(3):198-202.  

[15] 魏艳红,曲湘勇,蔡超,等.包膜复合酸化剂对东乡绿壳蛋鸡生产性能、矿物元素代谢及血清生化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(4):1222-1229.

[16] 刘艳利,辛洪亮,黄铁军,等.酸化剂对蛋鸡生产性能、蛋品质及肠道相关指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(2):526-534.

[17] 陈杰,沈一茹,张珊,等.酸化剂对蛋鸡产蛋性能、蛋品质和经济效益的影响[J].中国家禽,2015,37(8):58-60.

[18] 杨海斌,张加玲,刘桂英,等.鸡鸭不同组织脏器中嘌呤和尿酸的含量及其分布研究[J].营养学报,2013,35(5):505-507.

[19] 黎宗宝,陈海浪,王学梅.复合有机酸对文昌鸡营养物质代谢及血液理化指标的影响[J].饲料工业,2015,36(8):8-11.

[20] SHI R,LIU D,SUN J,et al.Effect of replacing dietary FeSO4 with equal Fe-levelled iron glycine chelate on broiler chickens[J].Czech Journal of Animal Science,2015,60(5):233-239.

[21] MA W Q,SUN H,ZHOU Y,et al.Effects of iron glycine chelate on growth,tissue mineral concentrations,fecal mineral excretion,and liver antioxidant enzyme activities in broilers[J].Biological Trace Element Research,2012,149(2):204-211.  
Outlines

/