Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Culture on Growth Performance, Apparent Availability of Nutrients and Intestinal Bacteria Flora of 817 Broiler Chickens

DING Xiaojuan, ZHANG Xiaotu, WANG Shiqiong, CHEN Guanhua, LI Xiao, WANG Fengjiu, LIANG Zhenxian, WANG Zhixiang

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.07.022

2017 , Vol. 29 >Issue 7: 2391 - 2398

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.07.022

Molecular Nutrition

Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Culture on Growth Performance, Apparent Availability of Nutrients and Intestinal Bacteria Flora of 817 Broiler Chickens

Expand

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China;
2. Henan Yihong Shancheng Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Wuzhi 454950, China

Received date: 2017-01-01

Online published: 2017-07-05

Fold

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture (SC) on growth performance, apparent availability of nutrients and intestinal bacteria of 817 broiler chickens. A total of 600 healthy one-day-old 817 brolier chickens with similar body weight were randomly divided into 5 groups with 6 replicates per group and 20 chicks per replicate. The chickens in control group were fed a basal diet, those in antibiotics group were fed the basal diet supplemented with 20 mg/kg sulfuric acid colistin and 2.6 mg/kg flavomycin, and those in trial groups Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ were fed the basal diet supplemented with 2 500, 5 000 and 7 500 mg/kg SC, respectively. The experiment lasted for 60 days. The results showed as follows: 1) during 1 to 21 days of age, average daily gain (ADG) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) in trial groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ were significantly increased than those in control group (P<0.05), but no significant difference were observed when compared with antibiotics group (P>0.05); during 22 to 60 days of age and 1 to 60 days of age, ADG in trial group Ⅱ was significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05), and ADFI was significantly higher than that in antibiotics group (P<0.05); compared with control group, feed to gain ratio and mortality in trial groups were not significantly changed (P>0.05), while downward trends were found during 1 to 60 days of age(0.05≤P<0.10). 2) Compared with control group, trial groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ significantly improved apparent availability of total phosphorus (P<0.05); no significant differences were found in apparent availability of crude protein and calcium among groups (P>0.05). 3) Compared with control group, trial group Ⅰ significantly decreased the number of E.coli in cecum (P<0.05) and achieve the level of antibiotics group (P>0.05); compared with control group and antibiotics group, the number of Lactobacillus in cecum of trial group Ⅱ as well as the number of Bifidobacteria in the jejunum of trial group Ⅲ were significantly increased (P<0.05), respectively. The results indicate that the supplementation of SC in diet at proper level can improve ADFI and ADG of broiler chickens, decrease feed to gain ratio, enhance total phosphorus apparent availability, promote the growth of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus, and inhabit the growth of E.coli; the optimal supplemental level of SC is 5 000 mg/kg, and its growth promotion effect is the best, which is better than antibiotics.

Key words： Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture; growth performance; nutrient; bacteria flora; 817 broiler chicken

Cite this article

DING Xiaojuan, ZHANG Xiaotu, WANG Shiqiong, CHEN Guanhua, LI Xiao, WANG Fengjiu, LIANG Zhenxian, WANG Zhixiang . Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Culture on Growth Performance, Apparent Availability of Nutrients and Intestinal Bacteria Flora of 817 Broiler Chickens[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2017 , 29(7) : 2391 -2398 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.07.022

References

[1] HUYGHEBAERT G,DUCATELLE R,VAN IMMERSEEL F,et al.An update on alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters for broilers[J].The Veterinary Journal,2011,187(2):182-188.

[2] GAGGÌA F,MATTARELLI P,BIAVATI B.Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology,2010,141(Suppl.):S15-S28.

[3] 周岭,丁雪梅,罗玉衡,等.复合酸化剂和微生态制剂对蛋鸡生产性能、血液生化指标、抗氧化指标及沙门氏菌感染的影响[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(8):2571-2580.

[4] BAGAL V L,KHATTA V K,TEWATIA B S,et al.Relative efficacy of organic acids and antibiotics as growth promoters in broiler chicken[J].Veterinary World,2016,9(4):377-382.

[5] 马明颖,胡光林,崔贞爱,等.糖萜素和酵母培养物对雏鸡生长性能及免疫器官的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2007,34(1):37-39.

[6] GAO J,ZHANG H J,YU S H,et al.Effects of yeast culture in broiler diets on performance and immunomodulatory functions[J].Poultry Science,2008,87(7):1377-1384.

[7] SHEN Y B,PIAO X S,KIM S W,et al.Effects of yeast culture supplementation on growth performance,intestinal health,and immune response of nursery pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science,2009,87(8):2614-2624.

[8] 荣博涵.酵母培养物对肉仔鸡生产性能与免疫功能的影响[D].硕士学位论文.长春:吉林农业大学,2015:16-24.

[9] TITI H H,DMOUR R O,ABDULLAH A Y.Growth performance and carcass characteristics of Awassi lambs and Shami goat kids fed yeast culture in their finishing diet[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2008,142(1/2):33-43.

[10] 孙满吉,刘彩娟,张永根,等.直接饲喂酵母培养物对奶牛瘤胃发酵的影响[J].动物营养学报,2010,22(5):1390-1395.

[11] 张爱忠,卢德勋,刘大程,等.酵母培养物对绒山羊机体免疫指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2008,20(2):163-169.

[12] 刘观忠,赵国先,安胜英,等.酵母培养物对蛋雏鸡生产性能、肠壁结构及免疫机能的影响[J].山东家禽,2004(10):10-13.

[13] 武书庚,刘质彬,齐广海,等.酵母培养物对产蛋鸡生产性能和蛋品质的影响[J].动物营养学报,2010,22(2):365-371.

[14] 刘莉如,滑静,王晓霞,等.抗菌肽对蛋用仔公鸡血液免疫指标和肠道菌群的影响[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(9):1812-1818.

[15] 王东明.酵母培养物对肉鸡消化与免疫调节影响的研究[D].硕士学位论文.长春:吉林农业大学,2007:1-10.

[16] 高俊.酵母培养物对肉仔鸡的作用及其机理[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2008:24-40.

[17] ZHANG S J,LIAO B L,LI X,et al.Effects of yeast cell walls on performance and immune responses of cyclosporine A-treated,immunosuppressed broiler chickens[J].British Journal of Nutrition,2012,107(6):858-866.

[18] AFSHARMANESH M,BARANI M,SILVERSIDES F G.Evaluation of wet-feeding wheat-based diets containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae to broiler chickens[J].British Poultry Science,2010,51(6):776-783.

[19] 肖曼,高振华,李兴华,等.酵母培养物对肉仔鸡生长性能、肠黏膜结构及肠道菌群的影响[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(7):1624-1631.

[20] GHOSH T K,HALDAR S,BEDFORD M R,et al.Assessment of yeast cell wall as replacements for antibiotic growth promoters in broiler diets:effects on performance,intestinal histo-morphology and humoral immune responses[J].Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition,2012,96(2):275-284.

[21] 周淑芹,孙文志.酵母培养物与抗生素对肉仔鸡生长性能及免疫机能影响的研究[J].畜牧与兽医,2004,36(11):9-11.

[22] BROOKS P H,BEAL J D,NIVEN S,et al.Liquid feeding of pigs.Ⅱ.Potential for improving pig health and food safety[J].Animal Science Papers and Reports,2003,21(Suppl.1):23-29.

[23] MORALES-LÓPEZ R,AUCLAIR E,VAN IMMERSEEL F,et al.Effects of different yeast cell wall supplements added to maize-or wheat-based diets for broiler chickens[J].British Poultry Science,2010,51(3):399-408.

[24] ZHANG A W,LEE B D,LEE S K,et al.Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell components on growth performance,meat quality,and ileal mucosa development of broiler chicks[J].Poultry Science,2005,84(7):1015-1021.

[25] 于素红.酵母培养物对肉仔鸡生产性能的影响及代谢机理研究[D].硕士学位论文.杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008:10-18.

[26] 倪学勤,GONG J,YU H,等.采用PCR-DGGE技术分析蛋鸡肠道细菌种群结构及多样性[J].畜牧兽医学报,2008,39(7):955-961.

[27] BAURHOO B,GOLDFLUS F,ZHAO X.Purified cell wall of saccharomyces cerevisiae increases protection against intestinal pathogens in broiler chickens[J].International Journal of Poultry Science,2009,8(2):133-137.

[28] SPRING P,WENK C,DAWSON K A,et al.The effects of dietary mannaoligosaccharides on cecal parameters and the concentrations of enteric bacteria in the ceca of salmonella-challenged broiler chicks[J].Poultry Science,2000,79(2):205-211.

[29] KEMME P A,JONGBLOED A W,MROZ Z,et al.Digestibility of nutrients in growing-finishing pigs is affected by Aspergillus niger phytase,phytate and lactic acid levels:1.Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids[J].Livestock Production Science,1999,58(2):107-117.

[30] CRUMPLEN R,D'AMORE T,PANCHAL C J,et al.Industrial uses of yeast-present and future[J].Yeast,1989,5(Suppl.):3-9.

[31] 王斌星,王蜀金,郭春华,等.酿酒酵母发酵液对断奶仔猪生长性能、小肠发育及小肠黏膜免疫功能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(12):294-302.

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References