Molecular Nutrition

Effects of Adding Baclicus lincheniformi to Diet or Aquaculture Water on Growth Performance and Immunity of Litopenaeus vannamei

Expand
  • 1. Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin 300384, China;
    2. South China Sea Fishieres Research, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, China;
    3. Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;
    4. DSM (China) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201203, China;
    5. Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510300, China

Received date: 2017-02-01

  Online published: 2017-08-02

Abstract

Two trials were conducted to investigate the effects of adding Baclicus lincheniformi to diet or aquaculture water on growth performance and immunity of Litopenaeus vannamei. The average initial body weight of Litopenaeus vannamei in the two trials was about 1.06 g. In trial 1, shrimps in five groups were fed five experimental diets with different levels of Baclicus lincheniformi or probiotics A (D1 group, as blank control group: not adding probiotics; D2 group: adding 0.3 mg/kg Baclicus lincheniformi; D3 group: adding 3.0 mg/kg Baclicus lincheniformi; D4 group: adding 30.0 mg/kg Baclicus lincheniformi; D5 group, as positive control group: adding 80.0 mg/kg probiotics A, probiotics A was market complex-probiotics-preparation). In trial 2, shrimps in four groups were all fed the diet of D1 group in trial 1. Before the trial started, added 0 (d1 group, that was D1 group), 0.4 (d2 group), 4.0 mg Baclicus lincheniformi (d3 group) and 40.0 mg probiotics B (probiotics B was market complex-probiotics-water purifying agent; d4 group, as positive control group) to the aquaculture water in concrete tank (1 m×1 m×1 m, and effective water depth was 0.7 m), and then added 0, 0.2, 2.0 mg Baclicus lincheniformi and 20.0 mg probiotics B to the aquaculture water every 7 days, respectively. Each group had six concrete tanks and each concrete tank had eighty shrimps. The feeding time of trials 1 and 2 were all 8 weeks. The results of trial 1 were showed as follows: the final average body weight (FBW) of shrimps from D1 to D4 groups was significantly higher than that from D5 group (P<0.05), and no significant differences were found among D1 to D4 groups (P>0.05). The specific growth ratio (SGR) and weight gain rate (WGR) of shrimps from D2 group were significantly higher than those from D5 group (P<0.05), but without significant differences compared with D1, D3 and D4 groups (P>0.05). The feed conversion ratio (FCR) of shrimps from D2, D3 and D4 groups was significantly lower than that from D1 group (P<0.05), but without significant difference compared with D5 group (P>0.05). The survival rate (SR) of shrimps from D4 group was significantly higher than that from other groups (P<0.05). The hepatopancreas superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity of shrimps from D2 and D5 groups was higher, and significantly higher than that from other groups (P<0.05). The hepatopancreas total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) of shrimps from D4 group was the highest, and significantly higher than that from other groups (P<0.05). The hepatopancreas malondialdehyde (MDA) content was decreased with the dietary Baclicus lincheniformi supplemental amount increasing, the hepatopancreas MDA content from D4 group was the lowest, and significantly lower than that from D1, D2 and D3 groups (P<0.05), but without significant difference compared with D5 group (P>0.05). The results of trial 2 showed as follows: adding Baclicus lincheniformi to aquaculture water had no significant effects on FBW, WGR, SGR and FCR (P<0.05). The hepatopancreas alkaline phosphatase (AKP), SOD activities and T-AOC of shrimps from d2 group were the highest, and significantly higher than those from other groups (P<0.05). The hepatopancreas lysozyme (LZM) activity of shrimps from d2 group was the highest, and significantly higher than that of shrimps from other groups (P<0.05). The hepatopancreas MDA content of shrimps from d1 group was the highest, and significantly higher than that of shrimps from other groups (P<0.05). In conclusion, the Baclicus lincheniformi can improve the immunity of Litopenaeus vannamei by means of adding Baclicus lincheniformi to diet or aquaculture water; the Baclicus lincheniformi adding to diet or aquaculture water has better effect than probiotics A or probiotics B with considering the growth performance and immunity of Litopenaeus vannamei; moreover, the supplemental amount of Baclicus lincheniformi in the diet of Litopenaeus vannamei should be controlled to 0.3 to 3.0 mg/kg base on consider the results of trials 1 and 2.

Cite this article

LIU Qiangqiang, CHEN Xu, XIE Jiajun, ZHANG Lin, NIU Jin . Effects of Adding Baclicus lincheniformi to Diet or Aquaculture Water on Growth Performance and Immunity of Litopenaeus vannamei[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2017 , 29(8) : 2808 -2816 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.08.025

References

[1] NOMOTO K.Prevention of infections by probiotics[J].Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering,2005,100(6):583-592.  

[2] THOMPSON F L,ABREU P C,CAVALLI R.The use of microorganisms as food source for Penaeus paulensis larvae[J].Aquaculture,1999,174(1/2):139-153.  

[3] GATESOUPE F J.The use of probiotics in aquaculture[J].Aquaculture,1999,180(1/2):147-165.  

[4] BALCÁZAR J L,DE BLAS I,RUIZ-ZARZUELA I,et al.The role of probiotics in aquaculture[J].Veterinary Microbiology,2006,114(3/4):173-186.

[5] 曹煜成,李卓佳,林小涛,等.地衣芽孢杆菌De株对凡纳滨对虾粪便的降解效果[J].热带海洋学报,2010,29(4):125-131.

[6] 曹煜成,文国樑,张华军,等.地衣芽孢杆菌对凡纳滨对虾TollHSP70基因表达的影响[J].中国微生态学杂志,2013,25(8):882-886.

[7] LI K,ZHENG T L,TIAN Y,et al.Beneficial effects of Bacillus licheniformis on the intestinal microflora and immunity of the white shrimp,Litopenaeus vannamei[J].Biotechnology Letters,2007,29(4):525-530.

[8] 胡毅,谭北平,麦康森,等.饲料中益生菌对凡纳滨对虾生长、肠道菌群及部分免疫指标的影响[J].中国水产科学,2008,15(2):244-251.

[9] 曹煜成,李卓佳,杨莺莺,等.地衣芽孢杆菌De株对黄鳍鲷生长及其养殖池塘主要环境因子的影响[J].南方水产,2010,6(3):1-6.

[10] 曹煜成,李卓佳,林黑着,等.地衣芽孢杆菌De在优质草鱼养殖中的应用研究[J].南方水产,2008,4(3):15-19.

[11] AVELLA M A,GIOACCHINI G,Decamp O,et al.Application of multi-species of Bacillus in sea bream larviculture[J].Aquaculture,2010,305(1/2/3/4):12-19.

[12] 李卓佳,袁丰华,林黑着,等.地衣芽孢杆菌对尖吻鲈生长和消化酶活性的影响[J].台湾海峡,2011(1):43-48.

[13] 李晓英,董志国,阎斌伦,等.复合微生态制剂对中国对虾养殖池塘水质和生长性能的影响[J].中国饲料,2007(19):27-29.

[14] 宋学宏,耿秋慧,杨彩根,等.一种生物净水剂对河蟹养殖水体水质净化效果研究[J].水生学杂志,2009,2(6):89-93.

[15] 常传刚,张磊.芽孢杆菌在日本对虾育苗中的应用试验[J].齐鲁渔业,2010,27(9):16-17.

[16] AOAC.Official methods of analysis[M].16th ed.Arlington,VA:Association of Official Analytical Chemists,1995.

[17] 刘泓宇,李正,孙武卫,等.饲料中添加益生菌或植物提取物对凡纳滨对虾生长、免疫力及抗病力的影响[J].饲料工业,2014,35(12):21-26.

[18] 丁贤,李卓佳,陈永青,等.芽孢杆菌对凡纳对虾生长和消化酶活性的影响[J].中国水产科学,2004,11(6):580-584.

[19] 华雪铭,周洪淇,张宇峰,等.饲料中添加壳聚糖和益生菌对暗纹东方鲀幼鱼生长及部分消化酶活性的影响[J].水生生物学报,2005,29(3):299-305.

[20] 张锦华,倪学勤,何后军,等.不同益生素对鲤鱼肠道蛋白酶、淀粉酶活力的影响[J].江西农业大学学报,2005,27(4):513-516.

[21] ZIAEI-NEJAD S,REZAEI M H,TAKAMI G A,et al.The effect of Bacillus spp. bacteria used as probiotics on digestive enzyme activity,survival and growth in the Indian white shrimp Fenneropenaeus indicus[J].Aquaculture,2006,252(2/3/4):516-524.

[22] 曹煜成,李卓佳,冯娟,等.地衣芽孢杆菌De株之胞外产物对凡纳滨对虾淀粉酶活性影响的体外研究[J].台湾海峡,2007,26(4):536-542.

[23] 姚东林,邹青,刘文斌,等.地衣芽孢杆菌和低聚木糖对草鱼生长性能、肠道菌群和消化酶活性的影响[J].大连海洋大学学报,2014,29(2):136-140.

[24] KIM D H,AUSTIN B.Innate immune responses in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss,Walbaum) induced by probiotics[J].Fish & Shellfish Immunology,2006,21(5):513-524.

[25] SALINAS I,DÍAZ-ROSALES P,CUESTA A,et al.Effect of heat-inactivated fish and non-fish derived probiotics on the innate immune parameters of a teleost fish (Sparus aurata L.)[J].Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology,2006,111(3/4):279-286.

[26] 沈文英,余东游,李卫芬,等.地衣芽孢杆菌对三角帆蚌消化酶活性、免疫指标和抗氧化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2009,21(1):95-100.

[27] RENGPIPAT S,RUKPRATANPORN S,PIYATIRATITIVORAKUL S,et al.Immunity enhancement in black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) by a probiont bacterium (Bacillus S11)[J].Aquaculture,2000,191(4):271-288.

[28] 张峰峰,谢凤行,赵玉洁,等.枯草芽孢杆菌水质净化作用的研究[J].华北农学报,2009,24(4):218-221.
Outlines

/