The biological yields of different organs and whole plant among different types of maize varieties were compared in the present study, in order to improve the selection efficiency of maize directed cultivation. This study selected 32 representative maize varieties as test materials, according to the maize starch property, grain shape, mature property and application of four kinds of classification methods, respectively, the fresh matter, air-dry matter, dry matter, crude protein and gross energy yields of grain, corncob, bract, leaf, sheath, stem and whole plant for maize in full ripening stage made a comparative study. There were 5 plots per variety and 10 plants were selected in each plot. The results showed that the fresh matter, air-dry matter, dry matter, crude protein and gross energy yields of grain, corncob, bract, leaf, sheath, stem and whole plant had significant differences among different types of maize varieties (P<0.05). According to the classification of starch property, grain shape and mature property, not enough to distinguish the biological yields of different organs and whole plant among different types of maize varieties (P>0.05). According to the classification of application, the significant differences were found in the biological yields of different organs and whole plant (except the air-dry matter, dry matter, crude protein and gross energy yields of corn grain) among different types of maize varieties (P>0.05), which showed forage maize>red grain maize>normal maize>waxy maize. Comparison of normal maize and forage maize, assumed that normal maize to yield 100.0%, the fresh matter yields of grain, corncob, bract, leaf, sheath, stem and whole plant for forage maize were 121.9%, 164.2%, 175.5%, 149.0%, 151.7%, 168.8% and 149.9%, respectively; the dry matter yields of them were 107.9%, 143.7%, 155.1%, 139.4%, 126.1%, 162.0% and 129.1%, respectively; the dry matter yield of them were 107.5%, 143.4%, 155.0%, 139.5%, 125.7%, 162.0% and 129.21%, respectively; the crude protein yields of them were 119.0%, 142.9%, 181.5%, 161.6%, 122.0%, 137.4% and 131.7%, respectively; the gross energy yields of them were 107.7%, 143.8%, 155.0%, 139.4%, 126.1%, 162.0% and 129.1%, respectively. The percentage of dry matter, crude protein and gross energy yields of maize gain in maize whole plant, the normal maize were 47.75%, 57.87% and 48.49%, respectively, while the forage maize were 39.72%, 52.36% and 40.48%, respectively. In conclusion, whole plant feeding of normal maize is the most basic strategy of "grain to feed". The biological yields of gain and whole plant for forage maize are higher than those for normal maize, and forage maize can increase the land use around 30%.
YANG Lijie, WANG Zhaofeng, WU Xiaojing, LI Simeng, LIU Tingjun, YANG Zaibin, JIANG Shuzhen
. A Comparison on Biological Yields of Different Organs and Whole Plant among Different Types of Maize Varieties[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2017
, 29(9)
: 3220
-3231
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.09.025
[1] 苏绣峡,邱山.秸秆饲料开发利用的思考[J].中国饲料,1996(12):5-7.
[2] RAMESSAR K,SABALZA M,CAPELL T,et al.Maize plants:an ideal production platform for effective and safe molecular pharming[J].Plant Science,2008,174(4):409-419
[3] 王中华,方磊涵,赵香菊,等.青贮玉米籽实对蛋鸡生产性能、蛋品质和肠道内环境的影响[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(8):1571-1576.
[4] 顾剑新.不同破碎处理对玉米淀粉瘤胃降解、利用和湖羊生长的影响[D].硕士学位论文.杭州:浙江大学,2005.
[5] 卞云龙,顾啸,孙东雷,等.玉米茎秆糖含量的遗传模式分析[J].作物学报,2013,39(2):249-257.
[6] 马飞前,刘小刚,王红武,等.玉米茎秆纤维素含量遗传分析[J].玉米科学,2015,23(1):10-16.
[7] KHONJE M,MANDA J,ALENE A D,et al.Analysis of adoption and impacts of improved maize varieties in eastern Zambia[J].World Development,2015,66:695-706.
[8] BEYENE A D,KASSIE M.Speed of adoption of improved maize varieties in Tanzania:an application of duration analysis[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2015,96:298-307.
[9] 丁仕英,汪经壮.玉米种植现状与新技术应用的效率[J].吉林农业,2016(5):64.
[10] 王喜庆.试论玉米种植现状及新技术应用效率研究分析[J].农业与技术,2016,35(5):100.
[11] 梁宝文."粮改饲"提振饲料业原料供应格局或变[J].农村·农业·农民:B版,2015(3):50-51.
[12] 林笑."粮改饲"的产业机遇[J].农经,2015(5):50-51.
[13] 杜洁茹."粮改饲"时代已来[J].今日畜牧兽医,2016(2):29-32.
[14] 郑瑞强,刘小春."粮改饲"政策效应分析与关键问题研究热点[J].中国畜牧兽医文摘,2016,32(3):2-3.
[15] 张卫.粮改饲是解决玉米过剩的出路[J].中国食品,2016(4):100-101.
[16] NRC.Nutrient requirements of swine[S].Washington,D.C.:National Academies Press,2012.
[17] 杨在宾,王小明,丁晓,等.玉米全株发酵饲喂生长育肥猪效果及效益比较研究[J].猪业科学,2016,33(3):80-82.
[18] 宋锡章.青饲和青贮专用玉米品种应用现状及发展趋势[J].黑龙江农业科学,2003(3):30-32.
[19] 杨国航,吴金锁,张春原,等.青贮玉米品种利用现状与发展[J].作物杂志,2013(2):13-16.