Molecular Nutrition

Effects of Yeast Culture on Performance, Egg Quality and Egg Health Indicators of Laying Hens

Expand
  • 1. Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Bejing 100081, China;
    2. Institute of Animal Science of Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 2017-03-02

  Online published: 2017-09-08

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of yeast culture (YC) on performance, egg quality and egg health indicators of laying hens. A total of 2 304 Roman brown laying hens at 210-day-old were randomly allocated into 4 groups with 3 replicates per group and 192 laying hens per replicate. Hens in the control group (YC0 group) were fed a corn-soybean meal basal diet, and the others in the experimental groups (YC0.2, YC0.4 and YC0.6 groups) were fed the basal diet supplemented with 0.2%, 0.4% and 0.6% YC, respectively. The experiment lasted for 9 weeks. The results showed as follows:1) compared with the control group, the average egg weight of YC0.4 and YC0.6 groups was significantly increased (P<0.05), and the egg broken rate was significantly decreased (P<0.05); the soft egg rate of YC0.2, YC0.4 and YC0.6 groups was significantly decreased (P<0.05). 2) Compared with the control group, the shell thickness of YC0.4 and YC0.6 groups was significantly increased (P<0.05); the lighteness value of yolk color of YC0.4 and YC0.6 groups was significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the yellowness value was significantly increased (P<0.05); the redness value of yolk color of YC0.6 group was significantly increased (P<0.05). 3) Compared with the control group, at the third and ninth weeks of the experiment, the coliform number on eggshell surface of YC0.2, YC0.4 and YC0.6 groups was significantly decreased (P<0.05); at the third and sixth weeks of the experiment, the total bacteria number on eggshell surface of YC0.4 group was significantly decreased (P<0.05). 4) Compared with the control group, the apparent digestibility of crude protein, energy and dry matter of YC0.6 group was significantly increased (P<0.05). 5) Compared with the control group, the cecal Lactobacillus number of YC0.2, YC0.4 and YC0.6 groups was significantly decreased (P<0.05). In conclusion, diets supplemented with 0.4% and 0.6% YC can improve the egg quality and the feed digestibility of laying hens; diets supplemented with 0.2%, 0.4% and 0.6% YC can improve the performance of laying hens, and reduce the Lactobacillus number, and inhibit the production of Salmonella in the cecum. Comprehensive consideration, the dietary suitable supplementation of YC for laying hens is 0.4%.

Cite this article

ZHANG Jiaqi, QIN Yuchang, LI Junguo, LI Jun, NIU Libin, YU Zhiqin . Effects of Yeast Culture on Performance, Egg Quality and Egg Health Indicators of Laying Hens[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2017 , 29(9) : 3331 -3340 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.09.038

References

[1] NEWBOLD C J,WILLIAMS P E V,MCKAIN N,et al.The effects of yeast culture on yeast numbers and fermentation in the rumen of sheep[J].Proceeding of the Nutrition Society,1990,49(3):47.

[2] LESMEISTER K E,HEINRICHS A J,GABLE M T.Effects of Supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on rumen development,growth characteristics,and blood parameters in neonatal dairy calves[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2004,87(6):1832-1839.  

[3] SUNE R W,MUHLBACH P R F.Effect of feeding yeast diets on lactating performance of dairy cows[J].Korean Journal of Animal Science,1997,39(2):184-190.

[4] 刁程,李莉.酵母培养物在家禽(鸡)上的应用[J].家禽科学,2016(1):53-55.

[5] 张海军,齐广海,武书庚.酵母培养物在家禽中的应用[J].饲料工业,2006,27(11):42-45.

[6] 曾正清,谢幼梅,穆奎.酵母饲料对肉仔鸡肠道菌群及免疫机能的影响[J].山东畜牧兽医,2001(5):11-13.

[7] 周淑芹,孙文志.酵母培养物与抗生素对肉仔鸡生长性能及免疫机能影响的研究[J].畜牧与兽医,2004,36(11):9-11.

[8] 刘观忠,安胜英,姜国均,等.酵母培养物对蛋雏鸡肠壁结构及免疫机能的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2005,32(2):10-12.

[9] 岳支华,曾箭民.酵母细胞壁(PR-500)及其在养殖生产中的应用[J].中国水产,2000(5):68-69.

[10] 周淑芹,孙文志.酵母培养物对肉仔鸡免疫和生产性能影响的研究[J].饲料工业,2004,25(11):38-40.

[11] 张连忠.酵母培养物对蛋鸡生产性能及蛋品质的影响[J].饲料研究,2011(6):54-55.

[12] YALÇIN S,O?ÜZ F,GVÇLÜ B,et al.Effects of dietary dried baker's yeast on the performance,egg traits and blood parameters in laying quails[J].Tropical Animal Health and Production,2009,41(1):5-10.  

[13] MACEDO R J,ARREDONDO V,GARCÍA F,et al.Effect of supplemental yeast culture and physiological factors on colostrum and milk composition of Pelibuey ewes[J].Tropical Animal Health and Production,2012,44(2):349-354.  

[14] KASHONGWE O B,MIGWI P,BEBE B O,et al.Improving the nutritive value of wheat straw with urea and yeast culture for dry season feeding of dairy cows[J].Tropical Animal Health and Production,2014,46(6):1009-1014.  

[15] 周映华,张石蕊.甘露寡糖对肉鸡生产性能和肠道微生物以及免疫机能的影响[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2003,29(3):250-253.

[16] 武书庚,刘质彬,齐广海,等.酵母培养物对产蛋鸡生产性能和蛋品质的影响[J].动物营养学报,2010,22(2):365-371.

[17] 郑艳秋,甄玉国,刘墨,等.酵母培养物对饲喂霉变玉米日粮肉仔鸡肠壁结构和肠道菌群影响的研究[J].饲料工业,2010,31(22):34-36.

[18] 李慧,陈鹏,康学庆,等.日粮中添加酵母培养物对蛋鸡生产性能和蛋品质的影响[J].饲料博览,2016(4):22-24.

[19] 金加明,杨虎,吴宝霞,等.酵母培养物和寡糖对产蛋高峰期蛋鸡生产性能的影响[J].饲料研究,2005(3):44-45.

[20] 齐明星,苗丽萍,贺强,等.菌肽蛋白对蛋鸡生产性能、蛋品质、肠道菌群数量及血清生化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(12):3878-3886.

[21] 徐磊,刘波,谢骏,戈贤平,等.甘露寡糖对异育银鲫生长性能、免疫及HSP70基因表达的影响[J].水生生物学报,2012,36(4):656-664.

[22] 肖曼,高振华,李兴华,等.酵母培养物对肉仔鸡生长性能、肠黏膜结构及肠道菌群的影响[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(7):1624-1631.

[23] 于素红.酵母培养物对肉仔鸡生产性能的影响及代谢机理研究[D].硕士学位论文.杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008.

[24] 肖曼.酵母培养物对肉仔鸡生产性能、营养物质利用率及肠道相关指标的影响[D].硕士学位论文.湛江:广东海洋大学,2013.

[25] 张丽,丁宏标.酵母培养物、枯草芽孢杆菌和木瓜蛋白酶对保育猪生长性能、营养物质表观消化率和粪便微生物数量的影响[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(11):3642-3649.

[26] 周雪飞.酵母培养物对绵羊瘤胃发酵及消化道内营养物质流通与消化的影响[D].硕士学位论文.长春:吉林农业大学,2016.

[27] 寇慧娟,陈玉林,刘敬敏,等.酵母培养物对羔羊生产性能、营养物质表现消化率及瘤胃发育的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2011,27(8):45-50.

[28] 刘卫东,宋素芳,程璞.甘露寡糖和益生菌对肉仔鸡生产性能和肠道菌群的影响[J].家畜生态学报,2011,32(1):32-35.

[29] 肖曼,高振华,李兴华,等.酵母培养物对肉仔鸡生产性能、营养物质表观代谢率及血清生化指标的影响[J].河南农业科学,2013,42(8):115-118,140.

[30] 徐磊,刘波,谢骏,等.酵母培养物对异育银鲫生长、血液生化及免疫的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2010(6):371-374.
Outlines

/