Molecular Nutrition

Determination and Estimation of Available Energy Value of Peanut Vine as Single Straw Feed for Mutton Sheep

Expand
  • 1. Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China;
    2. College of Animal Science, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 210038, China

Received date: 2017-04-01

  Online published: 2017-10-31

Abstract

This study aimed to determine and estimate available energy value of peanut vine for mutton sheep using substitution and extrapolation methods, and find a proper substitution proportion of peanut vine in diet in substitution method, for the purpose of providing a reference for determination and estimation of available energy value of single straw feed. Fifty four healthy adult crossbreed wethers (Dorper×small-tailed Han F1) with body weight of (45.00±1.96) kg were used in a randomized block design. The wethers were divided into nine groups with six replicates per group and 1 sheep per replicate. Sheep in different groups were fed basal diet, full peanut vine diet and experimental diets using different proportions (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, and 70% respectively) of peanut vine to substitute basal diet. The adaptation period lasted for 10 d; the experimental period lasted for 9 d, including 3 d of gas metabolism test and 6 d of digestion and metabolism test. The results showed as follows:1) no significant difference was found in dry matter (DM) apparent digestibility among 20%, 30%, 40% groups and full peanut vine diet group (P>0.05), while these groups were significantly higher than the other groups (P<0.05). Apparent digestibility of organic matter (OM) of full peanut vine diet group had no significant difference with that of 20% group (P>0.05), and was significantly higher than other groups (P<0.05). Apparent digestibility of gross energy (GE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and ether extract (EE) of full peanut vine diet group were significant higher than those of 10% group (P<0.05), while apparent digestibility of crude protein (CP) was significantly lower than that of 10% group (P<0.05), and all of them had no significant differences with the other groups (P>0.05). 2) Digestive energy (DE) and metabolizable energy (ME) of peanut vine showed a similar trend, which was full peanut vine diet group (8.57 and 6.69 MJ/kg DM) had no significant difference with 20% (8.22 and 6.58 MJ/kg DM), 30% (8.02 and 6.50 MJ/kg DM), and 40% groups (8.10 and 6.52 MJ/kg DM), but these groups were significantly higher than the other groups. 3) The 'true' ME of peanut vine calculated by extrapolation method was 6.62 MJ/kg DM, which was close to ME form substitution method. It is concluded that the substitution method can be used for the calculation of DE and ME of peanut vine as a single forage for mutton sheep; the appropriate substitution proportion of peanut vine (straw feed) in diet is 20% to 40% for determination of available energy value.

Cite this article

ZHAO Mingming, MA Tao, ZHAO Jiangbo, DENG Kaidong, XIAO Yi, MA Junnan, MAO Jianhong, JIA Peng, DIAO Qiyu . Determination and Estimation of Available Energy Value of Peanut Vine as Single Straw Feed for Mutton Sheep[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2017 , 29(11) : 4162 -4170 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.11.040

References

[1] 张瑛,周建伟,刘浩,等.藏羊瘤胃发酵参数对燕麦干草为饲粮限饲的响应及其氮维持需要量估测[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(2):371-379.

[2] 张吉鹍,卢德勋,胡明,等.几种绵羊常用粗饲料GI的测定及其代谢能模型化研究[J].现代畜牧兽医,2005(7):5-7.

[3] 郝建祥.体外发酵法评定反刍动物饲料营养价值的研究[D].硕士学位论文.南京:南京农业大学,2011.

[4] HUANG Q,SHI C X,Su Y B,et al.Prediction of the digestible and metabolizable energy content of wheat milling by-products for growing pigs from chemical composition[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2014,196:107-116.

[5] SIBBALD I R.A bioassay for true metabolizable energy in feedingstuffs[J].Poultry Science,1976,55(1):303-308.  

[6] 常娟,尹清强,姜义宝,等.生物秸秆对肉鸡表观代谢能的影响及替代玉米适宜比例的研究[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(8):1557-1563.

[7] 刘德稳.生长猪常用七种饲料原料净能预测方程[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2014.

[8] BOLARINWA O A,ADEOLA O.Energy value of wheat,barley,and wheat dried distillers grains with solubles for broiler chickens determined using the regression method[J].Poultry Science,2012,91(8):1928-1935.  

[9] 刘洁,刁其玉,赵一广,等.肉用绵羊饲料养分消化率和有效能预测模型的研究[J].畜牧兽医学报,2012,43(8):1230-1238.

[10] 赵明明,杨开伦,邓凯东,等.直接法与替代法测定羊草对肉用绵羊代谢能值的比较研究[J]动物营养学报,2016,28(2):436-443.

[11] NRC.Nutrient requirements of small ruminants:sheep,goats,cervids and new world camelids[S].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,2007.

[12] 聂大娃,赵养涛,武书庚,等.套算法测定玉米代谢能适宜的玉米替代比例研究[J].动物营养学报,2008,20(5):606-610.

[13] 张丽英.饲料分析及质量检测技术[M].2版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.

[14] 杨嘉实,冯仰廉.畜禽能量代谢[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.

[15] ADEOLA O,ADEOLA O,ADEOLA H.Digestion and balance techniques in pigs[M]//LEWIS A J,SOUTHERN L L,et al.Swine nutrition.2nd ed.Washington,D.C.:CRC Press,2001:903-916.

[16] 陶春卫.反刍动物常用粗饲料营养价值评定及其有效能值预测模型的建立[D].硕士学位论文.大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2009.

[17] 刘哲,张昌吉,郝正里,等.饲喂含不同秸秆的全日粮颗粒料对绵羊瘤胃及血液代谢参数的影响[J].中国饲料,2005(11):12-14.

[18] 周怿,刁其玉.反刍动物瘤胃甲烷气体生成的调控[J].草食家畜,2008(4):21-24.

[19] 赵一广.肉用绵羊甲烷排放的测定与估测模型的建立[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2012.

[20] LOSADA B,GARCÍA-REBOLLAR P,ÁLVAREZ C,et al.The prediction of apparent metabolisable energy content of oil seeds and oil seed by-products for poultry from its chemical components,in vitro analysis or near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2010,160(1/2):62-72.

[21] FARRELL D J.Rapid determination of metabolisable energy of foods using cockerels[J].British Poultry Science,1978,19(3):303-308.  

[22] HILL F W,ANDENRSON D L.Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determinations with growing chicks[J].The Journal of Nutrition,1958,64(4):587-603.

[23] VILLAMIDE M J.Methods of energy evaluation of feed ingredients for rabbits and their accuracy[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1996,57(3):211-223.  

[24] 张子仪,吴克谦,吴同礼,等.应用回归分析评定鸡饲料表观代谢能值的研究[J].畜牧兽医学报,1981,12(4):223-230.

[25] 王凤红.肉仔鸡饲用油脂营养价值的评定[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2009.
Outlines

/