Molecular Nutrition

Influences of Elephant Grass Diet with Different Energy Levels on Growth, Digestion and Serum Biochemical Parameters of Beef Cattle

Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China;
    2. Institute of Subtropical Agriculture of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China;
    3. Guangxi Huisheng Husbandry Development Co., Ltd., Nanning 532700, China;
    4. Livestock Breed Improvement Center of Guangxi, Nanning 530002, China

Received date: 2017-09-06

  Online published: 2018-03-05

Abstract

This study was conducted to research the influences of increasing dietary energy level by replacing elephant grass with corn on growth, digestion and serum biochemical parameters of beef cattle, aimed to provide a theoretical basis for optimum supplement of energy for beef cattle fattening. Thirty healthy crossbred beef cattle at 21 months of age with body weight of (449.4±45.7) kg were randomly allocated into 3 groups with 10 heads per group. The three groups were low energy (LE) group, medium energy (ME) group and high energy (HE) group, and the corresponding contents of corn and elephant grass in dietary dry matter were 12.5%, 22.5%, 32.5% and 60.0%, 50.0%, 40.0%, respectively. The experimental period lasted for 45 days including 5-day pre-trail period and 40-day trial period. Average daily gain (ADG), feed to gain ratio (F/G) and economic benefit were calculated during the trial period; dry matter apparent digestibility was measured by total fecal collection method at the last 5 days; rumen fluid pH of was measured before morning feeding and at 2.5 and 6.0 h after morning feeding at the last 2 days; blood sample was collected to measure serum biochemical parameters at the last day. The results showed as follows:1) ADG was the highest in HE group (1.31 kg/d) and the lowest in LE group (0.96 kg/d), and that in ME group was in the middle (1.21 kg/d), while there was no significant difference among groups (P>0.05); dry matter intake and dry matter apparent digestibility showed HE group > ME group > LE group, and the differences between HE group and LE group were significant, while F/G showed the opposite change; 2) rumen fluid pH before morning feeding in HE group was the lowest, but the difference among groups was not significant (P>0.05); rumen fluid pH at 2.5 and 6.0 after morning feeding in HE group and ME group was significantly lower than in LE group (P<0.05); 3) economy benefit in LE group was the lowest among three groups, and gross profit was lower than HE group and ME group by 46.10% and 40.28%, respectively; 4) there were no significant differences of serum biochemical parameters among three groups (P>0.05). In conclusion, when elephant grass is used as the only forage in beef cattle fattening, dry matter intake, dry matter apparent digestibility, average daily gain and economic benefit are improved while F/G is reduced when increasing energy level by replacing elephant grass with corn; there are no adverse effects on rumen fermentation and animal health even though corn occupies 32.5% of diet, and the best economic benefit is obtained.

Cite this article

WU Tingting, WANG Min, GUO Hui, YANG Yingbai, HE Zhixiong, WANG Rong, MA Zhiyuan, HUANG Linfeng, LIN Bo, LIANG Yunbin . Influences of Elephant Grass Diet with Different Energy Levels on Growth, Digestion and Serum Biochemical Parameters of Beef Cattle[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2018 , 30(3) : 1178 -1184 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.03.044

References

[1] 陈慧.不同能量饲料的组成差异及瘤胃降解特性的比较研究[D].硕士学位论文.雅安:四川农业大学,2013.

[2] DRENNAN M J,KEANE M G.Responses to supplementary concentrates for finishing steers fed silage[J].Irish Journal of Agricultural Research,1987,26(2/3):115-127.

[3] 谢国强,何余湧,程树芳,等.几种热带牧草饲喂肉牛效果的研究[J].中国草地学报,2006(1):51-53.

[4] 戴征煌,甘兴华,徐桂花,等.桂牧1号象草青贮饲料育肥肉牛效果的观察[J].江西畜牧兽医杂志,2014(1):40-41.

[5] 黄香,文信旺,吴亮,等.桂牧一号杂交象草对奶牛生产性能影响的试验[J].广东畜牧兽医科技,2009(5):27-28.

[6] 梁英彩,滕少花.桂牧1号等三种牧草饲养山羊试验研究[J].草业科学,2000(3):51-52.

[7] 何余湧,谢国强,石庆华,等.矮象草补充不同比例米糠和棉粕对生长肥育牛生产性能和经济效益的影响[J].草业科学,2006(4):59-62.

[8] SHEN J S, CAI Z, SONG L J, et al.Insertion depth of oral stomach tubes affect the fermentation parameters of ruminal fluid collected in dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2012,95:5978-5984.

[9] 张毕红,苏展,胡小芳,等.粗饲料的品质对反刍动物生产性能的影响[J].饲料研究,2011(9):60-62.

[10] 唐黎标.日粮精粗比对反刍动物的影响[J].江西畜牧兽医杂志,2017(1):37-38.

[11] 华金玲,郭亮,王立克,等.不同精粗比日粮对黄淮白山羊瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2013,44(6):58-62.

[12] JOHNSON R J,KARUNAJEEWA H.The effects of dietary minerals and electrolytes on the growth and physiology of the young chick[J].The Journal of Nutrition,1985,115(12):1680.

[13] POTTS S B,BOERMAN J P,LOCK A L,et al.Relationship between residual feed intake and digestibility for lactating Holstein cows fed high and low starch diets[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2017,100(1):265.

[14] 李伟忠,单安山.挥发性脂肪酸在动物体内的作用[J].饲料博览,2003(10):5-7.

[15] 汪水平,王文娟,王加启,等.日粮精粗比对奶牛瘤胃发酵及泌乳性能的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,(6):44-50.

[16] HOUTERT M F J V.The production and metabolism of volatile fatty acids by ruminants fed roughages:a review[J].Animal Feed Science & Technology,1993,43(3/4):189-225.

[17] 张国梁,王重阳.营养水平对不同品种杂交肉牛育肥的影响[J].饲料研究,2007(2):48-52.

[18] SUDRE K,CASSAR-MALEK I,LISTRAT A,et al.Biochemical and transcriptomic analyses of two bovine skeletal muscles in Charolais bulls divergently selected for muscle growth[J].Meat Science,2005,70(2):267-277.  

[19] 燕文平,张莹莹,王聪,等.不同精粗比日粮对肉牛生产性能和血液指标的影响[J].饲料研究,2014,(21):54-57.
Outlines

/