Molecular Nutrition

Effects of Acidified Milk on Growth Performance and Serum Immune Indexes of Holstein Calves

Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China

Received date: 2018-09-09

  Online published: 2019-04-16

Abstract

This experiment was aimed to study the effects of feeding acidified milk on growth performance and serum immune indexed of calves. A randomized comparative experiment design was adopted. Twenty healthy Holstein female calves at 3 days of age with the body weight of (40±5) kg were selected from a large-scale dairy farm, and were divided into 2 groups with 10 calves for each group. The control group fed pasteurized milk, the test group fed acidic milk, and both groups fed pellet diets ad libitum. The test period was 180 days (weaning at day 60). Feed intake of calves was recorded every day. Body weight of calves was measured at days 7, 30, 60, 90 and 180 of growth period, and daily weight gain was calculated. Meanwhile, blood was collected for measuring serum immunologic indexes. The results showed as follows:1) the milk urea nitrogen content of acidified milk group was significantly higher than that of pasteurized milk group (P<0.01), the number of Escherichia coli and total bacteria was significantly lower than that of pasteurized milk group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in lactose percentage, milk fat percentage and milk protein percentage between groups (P>0.05). 2) At days 31 to 50, the liquid feed average daily feed intake of acidified milk group was significantly higher than that of pasteurized milk group (P<0.01); at days 61 to 90, the solid feed average daily feed intake of acidified milk group was significantly higher than that of pasteurized milk group (P<0.01). 3) At days 60 to 180, the average daily gain of acidified milk group was significantly increased compared with pasteurized milk group (P<0.05). At day 60, the body straight length, body height and cannon bone circumference of acidified milk group were significantly higher than those of pasteurized milk group (P<0.05); at day 90, body straight length, body oblique length, body height and cannon bone circumference were significantly higher than those of pasteurized milk group (P<0.05); at day 180, the body straight length, body oblique length and body height of acidified milk group were significantly increased compared with pasteurized milk group (P<0.01). 4) At day 60, serum immunoglobulin (Ig) A content of acidified milk group was significantly higher than that of pasteurized milk group (P<0.05); at day 90, serum IgG content of acidified milk group was significantly higher than that of pasteurized milk group (P<0.01); at days 90 and 180, serum IgM content of acidified milk group was significantly higher than that of pasteurized milk group (P<0.05). At day 30, the contents of serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-1β of pasteurized milk group were significantly higher than those of acidified milk group (P<0.01), and the content of serum IL-6 was significantly higher than that of acidified milk group (P<0.05); at day 60, the content of serum IL-1β of pasteurized milk group was significantly higher than that of acidified milk group (P<0.01), and the content of serum IL-6 was significantly higher than that of acidified milk group (P<0.05); at day 90, the content of IL-1β of pasteurized milk group was significantly higher than that of acidified milk group (P<0.05). In summary, acidification of formic acid milk has little effect on the composition of milk, can inhibit the growth of harmful bacteria in milk, improve the palatability, feed intake and immunity.

Cite this article

YIN Shuxin, QU Yongli, GAO Yan, XIN Xiaoyue, WANG Lu, ZHANG Shuai . Effects of Acidified Milk on Growth Performance and Serum Immune Indexes of Holstein Calves[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019 , 31(4) : 1655 -1665 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.04.023

References

[1] 孙志华.我国奶业发展现状浅析[J].中国畜牧业,2018(11):36-37.

[2] YU Y,STONE J B,WILSON M R,et al.Fermented bovine colostrum for holstein replacement calf rearing[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1976,59(5):936-943.  

[3] TODD C G,LESLIE K E,MILLMAN S T,et al.Clinical trial on the effects of a free-access acidified milk replacer feeding program on the health and growth of dairy replacement heifers and veal calves[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2017,100(1):713-725.  

[4] 曹学浩,刘景喜,孟庆江,等.饲喂酸化奶对犊牛生长、血液指标和腹泻的影响[J].天津农业科学,2017,23(2):20-25.

[5] 谭世新,翟卫爽,俞新雷,等.饲喂酸化奶对犊牛生长发育的影响[J].中国奶牛,2015(3/4):13-16.

[6] AOAC.Official methods of analysis[S].15th ed.Washington,D.C.:Association of Official Analytical Chemists,1990:152-169.

[7] 杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1993.

[8] 冯仰廉,周建民,张晓明,等.我国奶牛饲料产奶净能值测算方法的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,1987(1):8-11.

[9] 邓由飞.液体日粮对犊牛生长发育及胃肠道微生物菌群结构影响研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2017.

[10] 孙静丽,李林强,朱莉莉,等.全脂牛乳粉中糖基化酪蛋白分析[J].食品与机械,2017,33(7):6-10.

[11] 邵志鹏.高酯果胶稳定酸变性酪蛋白作用机理的研究[D].硕士学位论文.杭州:浙江工商大学,2015.

[12] 梁鸿斌,常硕,刘显春.不同防腐剂及其浓度对乳尿素氮的影响[J].中国奶牛,2017(11):56-59.

[13] 顾采东.基于PCR-TGGE技术研究不同热处理对牛乳杀菌效果的影响[D].硕士学位论文.沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2017.

[14] JORGENSEN M A,HOFFMAN P C,NYTES A J.A field survey of on-farm milk pasteurization efficacy[J].The Professional Animal Scientist,2006,22(6):472-476.  

[15] PALMER G H,MUDD A J.A note on the growth of some micro-organisms in stored bovine colostrum[J].Journal of Dairy Research,1972,39(2):227-230.  

[16] 屠焰.代乳品酸度及调控对哺乳期犊牛生长性能、血气指标和胃肠道发育的影响[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2011.

[17] 韩静,孟庆江,刘景喜,等.饲喂酸化奶对犊牛采食量、腹泻率、血清生化及免疫指标的影响[J].中国饲料,2016(18):20-23.

[18] EREN V.The effect of acidified milk on body weight gain,some blood parameters and health in calves[J].YYV Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi,2009,20(2):17-21.

[19] 韩永胜,佟桂芝,宋斌,等.酸化乳对和牛犊牛健康及发育的影响[J].中国畜禽种业,2016,12(6):55-56.

[20] 屠焰.犊牛消化道酸度及酸度调节剂研究进展[J].饲料与畜牧:新饲料,2012(3):25-29.

[21] 王世东.养牛生产学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2010.

[22] HEINRICHS A J,HEINRICHS B S,JONES C M,et al.Short communication:verifying Holstein heifer heart girth to body weight prediction equations[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2017,100(10):8451-8454.  

[23] VAN AMBURGH M E,GALTON D M,BAUMAN D E,et al.Effects of three prepubertal body growth rates on performance of Holstein heifers during first lactation[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1998,81(2):527-538.  

[24] VANDERHAEGHEN W,DEWULF J.Antimicrobial use and resistance in animals and human beings[J].The Lancet Planetary Health,2017,1(8):e307-e308.

[25] 崔治中,崔保安.兽医免疫学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.

[26] 张乃锋.蛋白质与氨基酸营养对早期断奶犊牛免疫相关指标的影响[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2008.

[27] 汪晶晶,任红立,董佳琦,等.微生态制剂和复合酸化剂对哺乳母猪生产性能、血清生化和免疫指标以及乳成分的影响[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(2):685-695.

[28] 华锋,刘金辉.TNF-α在抗感染中的作用[J].南昌大学学报:医学版,2012,52(5):96-99.

[29] 袁雪.巴氏杀菌β-内酰胺类抗奶对犊牛生长性能、血液指标和胃肠发育的影响[D].硕士学位论文.大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2016.

[30] 王霆,永井博一,坊田圭子,等.选择性白介素-6抑制剂Am-80对DA大鼠实验性自身免疫性脑炎的影响(英文)[J].中国药理学报,2000,21(11):967-976.

[31] 张德成,吴润培,陈思义,等.哺乳仔猪胃内酸度的变化对红细胞免疫功能的影响[J].饲料工业,1994,15(7):28-29.

[32] 刘艳丰,张文举,侯广田,等.沙棘嫩枝叶对阿勒泰羔羊生长性能、屠宰性能和血液指标的影响[C]//中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第七届中国饲料营养学术研讨会论文集.郑州:中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会,2014.

[33] NEWBOLD C J,WALLACE R J,MCINTOSH F M.Mode of action of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a feed additive for ruminants[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1996,76(2):249-261.  

[34] KIM Y Y,KIL D Y,OH H K,et al.Acidifier as an alternative material to antibiotics in animal feed[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2005,18(7):1048-1060.  

[35] 潘宝海,李德发,谯仕彦.益生菌、益生素及合生剂的作用机理和相互关系[J].中国饲料,2000(15):12-14.
Outlines

/