Molecular Nutrition

Comparison of Differences in Apparent Nutrient Digestibility and Rumen Metabolism between Alpaca (Lama pacos) and Sheep (Ovis aries) under Corn Straw as Roughage Condition

Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China

Received date: 2018-10-26

  Online published: 2019-05-15

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the differences in dry matter intake, nutrient apparent digestibility, rumen environment and excretion of total purine derivatives of two diets with different concentrate to corn rubbing stalk ratios between alpacas and sheep. Four 1-year-old alpacas [(25.8±4.7) kg] and four 1-year-old sheep [(28.3±5.8) kg] were used in this study designed as split-plot in two replicated 2×2 Latin square, respectively, and fed diets with different concentrate to corn rubbing stalk ratios [5:5 (MS) and 7:3 (LS)], respectively. The results showed as follows: 1) the dry matter intake of alpaca was significantly lower than that of sheep (P<0.01), and the apparent digestibility of ether extract and phosphorus were significantly higher than those of sheep (P<0.01); the contents of valeric acid, isobutyric acid and isovaleric acid and pH of alpaca were significantly higher than those of sheep (P<0.01), and the content of acetic acid was significantly lower than that of sheep (P<0.05); the excretion of total purine derivatives, uric acid and allantoin had significant differences between alpaca and sheep (P<0.01). 2) The apparent digestibility of crud protein, neutral washing fiber and ether extract of MS diets for alpaca were significantly higher than those of LS diets (P<0.01), and the apparent digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein and ether extract of MS diets for sheep were significantly higher than those of LS diets (P<0.05); the apparent digestibility of dry matter, calcium and phosphorus of MS diets for alpaca were significantly lower than those of LS diets (P<0.01). The pH and isobutyric acid content of alpaca fed MS diets were significantly higher than those fed LS diets (P<0.01), the propionic acid content was significantly higher than that fed LS diets (P<0.05); the contents of isobutyric acid and isovaleric acid of sheep fed MS diets were significantly higher than those fed LS diets (P<0.01), and the butyric acid content was significantly lower than that fed LS diets (P<0.01); acetic acid/propanoic acid of alpaca fed MS diets was significantly lower than that fed LS diets (P<0.05). The excretion of total purine derivatives and allantoin had no significant differences between two animals (P>0.05), but the excretion of uric acid of alpaca fed MS diets was significantly higher than that fed LS diets (P<0.05). In conclusion, under conditions of corn straw as roughage, there are some differences in the dry matter intake, rumen environment, apparent digestibility and the excretion of total purine derivatives between alpaca and sheep.

Cite this article

ZHAO Yajun, PEI Caixia, LIU Qiang, ZHANG Chunxiang, REN Youshe . Comparison of Differences in Apparent Nutrient Digestibility and Rumen Metabolism between Alpaca (Lama pacos) and Sheep (Ovis aries) under Corn Straw as Roughage Condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019 , 31(5) : 2416 -2422 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.05.049

References

[1] 董常生.羊驼学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2010.

[2] PEI C X,LIU Q,DONG C S,et al.Microbial community in the forestomachs of alpacas (Lama pacos) and sheep (Ovis aries)[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2013,12(2):314-318.  

[3] PEI C X,LIU Q,DONG C S,et al.Diversity and abundance of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences in forestomach of alpacas (Lama pacos) and sheep (Ovis aries)[J].Anaerobe,2010,16(4):426-432.  

[4] 姚建军,王娟,刘清清,等.羊驼第一胃室与绵羊瘤胃固相和液相外流速率的比较[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(5):1394-1400.

[5] DULPHY J P,DARDILLAT C,JAILLER M,et al.Comparative study of forestomach digestion in llamas and sheep[J].Reproduction Nutrition Development,1997,37:709-725.

[6] SAN MARTIN F,BRYANT F C.Nutrition of domesticated South American llamas and alpacas[J].Small Ruminant Research,1989,2(3):191-216.  

[7] FOWLER M E.Medicine and surgery of south American camelids[M].2nd ed.Ames:Iowa State University Press,1998.

[8] CARMALT J L.Protein-energy malnutrition in alpacas[J].Compend,2000,22:1118-1123.

[9] ALDERMAN G.Prediction of the energy value of compound feeds[M]//HARESIGN W,COLE D J A.Recent advances in animal nutrition.London:Butterworths,1985:3-53.

[10] Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Official methods of analysis[S].16th ed.Washington,D.C.:Association of Official Analytical Chemists,1995.

[11] VAN SOEST P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597.  

[12] CHEN X B,MATUSZEWSKI W,KOWALCZYK J.Determination of allantoin in biological,cosmetic,and pharmaceutical samples[J].Journal of AOAC International,1996,79(3):628-635.

[13] ORELLANA-BOERO P,SERADJ A R,FONDEVILA M,et al.Modelling urinary purine derivatives excretion as a tool to estimate microbial rumen outflow in alpacas (Vicugna pacos)[J].Small Ruminant Research,2012,107(2/3):101-104.

[14] NATSIR A.Rumen microbial protein supply as estimated from purine derivative excretion on sheep receiving faba beans (Vicia faba) as supplement delivered at different feeding frequencies[J].Indonesian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,2008,13(2):103-108.

[15] BRODERICK G A,KANG J H.Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75.  

[16] MAKKAR H P,SHARMA O P,DAWRA R K,et al.Simple determination of microbial protein in rumen liquor[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1982,65(11):2170-2173.  

[17] LIU Q,DONG C S,LI H Q,et al.Forestomach fermentation characteristics and diet digestibility in alpacas (Lama pacos) and sheep (Ovis aries) fed two forage diets[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2009,154(3/4):151-159.

[18] HOBSON P N.Introduction[M]//HOBSON P N,STEWART C S.The rumen microbial ecosystem.2nd ed.London:Blackie Academic and Professional,1997:1-9.

[19] 李岚捷,成述儒,刁其玉,等.不同NFC/NDF水平饲粮对犊牛瘤胃发酵参数和微生物区系多样性的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2017,48(12):2347-2357.

[20] 魏德泳,朱伟云,毛胜勇.日粮不同NFC/NDF比对山羊瘤胃发酵与瘤胃微生物区系结构的影响[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(7):1392-1398.

[21] XIA C Q,MUHAMMAD A U R,NIU W J,et al.Effects of dietary forage to concentrate ratio and wildrye length on nutrient intake,digestibility,plasma metabolites,ruminal fermentation and fecal microflora of male Chinese Holstein calves[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2018,17(2):415-427.  

[22] CORDESSE R,INESTA M,GAUBERT J L.Intake and digestibility of four forages by llamas and sheep[J].Annales de Zootechnie,1992,41(1):70.

[23] DULPHY J P,DARDILLAT C,JAILLER M,et al.Comparison of the intake and digestibility of different diets in llamas and sheep:a preliminary study[J].Annales de Zootechnie,1994,43(4):379-387.  

[24] LEMOSQUET S,DARDILLAT C,JAILLER M,et al.Voluntary intake and gastric digestion of two hays by llamas and sheep:influence of concentrate supplementation[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1996,127(4):539-548.  

[25] GENIN D,TICHIT M.Degradability of Andean range forages in llamas and sheep[J].Journal of Range Management,1997,50(4):381-385.  

[26] DULPHY J P,DARDILLAT C,JAILLER M,et al.Intake and digestibility of different forages in Hamas compared to sheep[J].Annales de Zootechnie,1998,47(1):75-81.  

[27] SAN MARTIN HOWARD F A.Comparative forage selectivity and nutrition of South American camelids and sheep[D].Ph.D.Thesis.Texas:Texas Tech University,1987.

[28] 王红宁,谢晶,吴琦,等.黑曲霉N25株产植酸酶及酶促反应条件研究[J].生物技术,2003,13(3):20-22.

[29] 曲丽君.泡盛曲霉植酸酶的酶学性质研究[J].微生物学杂志,2007,27(2):53-56.

[30] JOUANY J P.The digestion in camelids;a comparison to ruminants[J].Productions Animales,2000,13(3):165-176.

[31] HARRISON D G,BEEVER D E,THOMSON D J,et al.Manipulation of rumen fermentation in sheep by increasing the rate of flow of water from the rumen[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1975,85(1):93-101.  
Outlines

/