Effects of Complex Enzyme Preparation on Growth Performance, Apparent Digestibility of Nutrients, Serum Antioxidant Indexes and Endogenous Digestive Enzyme Activities of Weaned Piglets

  • SHI Linxin ,
  • QIAO Pengfei ,
  • LONG Shenfei ,
  • LU Wenqing
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2019-01-29

  Online published: 2019-08-19

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of complex enzyme preparation on growth performance, apparent digestibility of nutrients, serum antioxidant indexes and endogenous digestive enzyme activities of weaned piglets. Eighty-four 28-day-old weaned piglets (Duroc×Landrace×Yorkshire) with an initial body weight of (7.22±0.22) kg were randomly allocated to one of two groups in a randomized complete block design. Each group contained 7 replicates and each replicate contained 6 piglets (3 males and 3 females). Piglets in control group were fed a corn-soybean meal basal diet, and piglets in complex enzyme group were fed an experimental diet which supplemented with 1 000 mg/kg complex enzyme preparation (containing 4 000 U/g cellulase, 1 500 U/g α-amylase, 150 U/g β-glucanase and 3 000 U/g neutral protease) based on the basal diet. The trail period was 35 d, which was divided into two phases:early period (1 to 14 d) and later period (15 to 35 d). The results showed that compared with the control group, dietary supplemented with compound enzyme preparation could significantly decrease the feed/gain (F/G) of overall period (P<0.05) and the F/G in early (P=0.09) and later periods (P=0.05) both had the potential to be decreased; the apparent digestibility of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and ether extract (EE) in early and later periods of complex enzyme group was significantly increased (P<0.05 or P<0.01), and there was a tendency to increase the apparent digestibility of organic matter (OM) (P=0.07), crude protein (CP) (P=0.09) and gross energy (GE) (P=0.08) in early stage and the apparent digestibility of CP (P=0.07) and GE (P=0.09) in later stage in complex enzyme group. Compared with the control group, dietary supplemented with compound enzyme preparation significantly increased serum total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) and total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) activity (P<0.05 or P<0.01), significantly decreased serum malondialdehyde (MDA) content (P<0.05), and tended to increase serum glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity (P=0.06) on day 14; dietary supplemented with compound enzyme preparation significantly increased the serum GSH-Px activity (P<0.05), and had no significant effects on the other serum antioxidant indices on day 35 (P>0.05). In addition, compared with the control group, dietary supplemented with compound enzyme preparation significantly enhanced the activities of sucrase in both jejunal and ileal mucosa, lactase in ileal mucosa and pancrelipase in pancreas (P<0.05), and there was a tendency to increase the maltase activity in jejunal mucosa in complex enzyme group (P=0.07). In conclusion, dietary supplemented with 1 000 mg/kg complex enzyme preparation has the potential to improve physiological health and growth performance of weaned piglets by increasing the digestibility of nutrients and the activities of endogenous digestive enzymes and enhancing the serum antioxidant capacity.

Cite this article

SHI Linxin , QIAO Pengfei , LONG Shenfei , LU Wenqing . Effects of Complex Enzyme Preparation on Growth Performance, Apparent Digestibility of Nutrients, Serum Antioxidant Indexes and Endogenous Digestive Enzyme Activities of Weaned Piglets[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019 , 31(8) : 3872 -3881 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.08.049

References

[1] KNUDSEN K E B,SERENA A,KJAER A K B,et al.Rye bread enhances the production and plasma concentration of butyrate but not the plasma concentrations of glucose and insulin in pigs[J].The Journal of Nutrition,2005,135(7):1696-1704.  
[2] WU X Y,CHEN D W,YU B,et al.Effect of different dietary non-starch fiber fractions on growth performance,nutrient digestibility,and intestinal development in weaned pigs[J].Nutrition,2018,51-52:20-28.
[3] CHOCT M,HUGHES R J,WANG J,et al.Increased small intestinal fermentation is partly responsible for the anti-nutritive activity of non-starch polysaccharides in chickens[J].British Poultry Science,1996,37(3):609-621.  
[4] ANNISON G.The role of wheat non-starch polysaccharides in broiler nutrition[J].Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,1993,44(3):405-422.
[5] JEZIERNY D,MOSENTHIN R,BAUER E.The use of grain legumes as a protein source in pig nutrition:a review[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2012,157(3/4):111-128.
[6] HART S D,BARROWS F T,DABROWSKI K,et al.Soybean antinutritional factors and their relative importance in limiting the use of soybean meal in salmonid diets[R].United Soybean Board,Chesterfield,MO,and American Soybean Association,St.Louis,MO,USA,2007.
[7] ROOKE J A,SLESSOR M,FRASER H,et al.Growth performance and gut function of piglets weaned at four weeks of age and fed protease-treated soya-bean meal[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1998,70(3):175-190.  
[8] TIWARI U P,CHEN H Y,KIM S W,et al.Supplemental effect of xylanase and mannanase on nutrient digestibility and gut health of nursery pigs studied using both in vivo and in vitro models[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2018,245:77-90.
[9] PAN L,ZHAO P F,YANG Z Y,et al.Effects of coated compound proteases on apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients and apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids for pigs[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2016,29(12):1761-1767.  
[10] LIU Q,ZHANG W M,ZHANG Z J,et al.Effect of fiber source and enzyme addition on the apparent digestibility of nutrients and physicochemical properties of digesta in cannulated growing pigs[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2016,216:262-272.
[11] KNUDSEN K E B,NØRSKOV N P,BOLVIG A K,et al.Dietary fibers and associated phytochemicals in cereals[J].Molecular Nutrition and Food Research,2016,61(7),doi:10.1002/mnfr.201600518.
[12] CHOCT M.Feed non-starch polysaccharides:chemical structures and nutritional significance[J].Feed Milling International,1997,191:13-26.
[13] PAPADOPOULOS G A,MÜLLER K,SCHERTLING D,et al.Supplementation of lysolecithin in combination with a multi-non-starch polysaccharides enzyme improves the feed efficiency during the post-weaning period in piglets[J].Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica,Section A:Animal Science,2014,64(2):130-136.  
[14] PRANDINI A,SIGOLO S,MOSCHINI M,et al.Effect of Italian heavy pig diets based on different barley varieties with or without non-starch polysaccharides degrading enzymes on growth performance,carcass characteristics and fresh thigh quality[J].Italian Journal of Animal Science,2016,15(3):428-436.  
[15] OWUSU-ASIEDU A,SIMMINS P H,BRUFAU J,et al.Effect of xylanase and β-glucanase on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in piglets fed wheat-barley-based diets[J].Livestock Science,2010,134(1/2/3):76-78.
[16] 李洪龙,孙明梅,文玉兰.金属蛋白酶制剂对仔猪生产性能的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2006(12):61.
[17] 叶慧,黄升科,雷建平,等.组合型蛋白酶对仔猪生产性能和养分表观消化率的影响[J].广东农业科学,2013,40(6):120-123.
[18] 王冠颖,刘志国,战晓燕,等.不同蛋白酶对豆粕酶解作用效果的研究[J].饲料博览,2017(9):29-32.
[19] MEINLSCHMIDT P,SCHWEIGGERT-WEISZ U,BRODE V,et al.Enzyme assisted degradation of potential soy protein allergens with special emphasis on the technofunctionality and the avoidance of a bitter taste formation[J].LWT-Food Science and Technology,2016,68:707-716.
[20] 李学俭.β-甘露聚糖酶对断乳仔猪生产性能的影响及其机理的研究[D].博士学位论文.沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2008.
[21] 武书庚.肉仔鸡氧化应激模型的研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2007.
[22] 钟琴,陈代文,余冰,等.氧化应激对断奶仔猪的影响及营养的调控作用[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(1)::1-8.
[23] 伏润奇,陈代文,郑萍,等.酵母水解物对断奶仔猪生长性能、血清免疫和抗氧化能力及粪便菌群的影响[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(1):351-359.
[24] 魏金涛,杨雪海,赵娜,等.不同豆粕酶解发酵物对仔猪生长性能、血液生化指标、抗氧化能力的影响研究[J].饲料工业,2013(18):55-58.
[25] 杨丽娜.复合酶制剂对仔猪生长性能、抗氧化能力和免疫力的影响[D].硕士学位论文.杭州:浙江大学,2014.
[26] HAN X Y,YAN F Y,NIE X Z,et al.Effect of replacing antibiotics using multi-enzyme preparations on production performance and antioxidant activity in piglets[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2017,16(3):640-647.  
[27] 高阳.非淀粉多糖酶对猪生长性能和肉品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.长春:吉林大学,2014.
[28] ZHANG Y J,LIU Q,ZHANG W M,et al.Gastrointestinal microbial diversity and short-chain fatty acid production in pigs fed different fibrous diets with or without cell wall-degrading enzyme supplementation[J].Livestock Science,2018,207:105-116.
[29] ZENG Z K,ZHU J L,SHURSON G C,et al.Improvement of in vitro ileal dry matter digestibility by non-starch polysaccharide degrading enzymes and phytase is associated with decreased hindgut fermentation[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2018,246:52-61.
[30] 田刚,黄琳惠,宋晓华,等.壳寡糖对氧化应激仔猪生长性能、抗氧化能力及空肠养分消化和转运能力的影响[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(7):2652-2661.
[31] 贾玉川,黄大鹏,彭秋媛.蛋氨酸锌和维生素A对断奶仔猪生长性能及小肠前段肠道功能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(1):124-130.
[32] 周芬.断奶日龄和外源中性蛋白酶对仔猪生产性能、消化器官生长和消化酶活性的影响[D].硕士学位论文.南京:南京农业大学,2008.
[33] 许梓荣,李卫芬,孙建义.大麦日粮中添加NSP酶对仔猪胰脏和小肠消化酶活性的影响[J].中国兽医学报,2002,22(1):99-101.
[34] ZUO J J,LING B M,LONG L N,et al.Effect of dietary supplementation with protease on growth performance,nutrient digestibility,intestinal morphology,digestive enzymes and gene expression of weaned piglets[J].Animal Nutrition,2015,1(4):276-282.  
[35] LI W F,FENG J,XU Z R,et al.Effects of non-starch polysaccharides enzymes on pancreatic and small intestinal digestive enzyme activities in piglet fed diets containing high amounts of barley[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2004,10(6):856-859.  
[36] PEDERSEN N R,RAVN J L,PETTERSSON D.A multienzyme NSP product solubilises and degrades NSP structures in canola and mediates protein solubilisation and degradation in vitro[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2017,234:244-252.
[37] JACOBSEN H J,KOUSOULAKI K,SANDBERG A S,et al.Enzyme pre-treatment of soybean meal:effects on non-starch carbohydrates,protein,phytic acid,and saponin biotransformation and digestibility in mink (Neovison vison)[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2018,236:1-13.
Outlines

/