Effects of Roughage Combination of Different Types of Corn Silage on Growth Performance, Nutrient Apparent Digestibility and Serum Biochemical Indexes of Beef Cattle

XUE Xiao; NIU Yan; CAI Amin; ZHANG Xiaoxia; TENG Zhanwei; WANG Jianqin; QIN Haidong; LI Pengfei; GAO Tengyun

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.09.019

2019 , Vol. 31 >Issue 9: 4070 - 4079

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.09.019

Effects of Roughage Combination of Different Types of Corn Silage on Growth Performance, Nutrient Apparent Digestibility and Serum Biochemical Indexes of Beef Cattle

XUE Xiao ,
NIU Yan ,
CAI Amin ,
ZHANG Xiaoxia ,
TENG Zhanwei ,
WANG Jianqin ,
QIN Haidong ,
LI Pengfei ,
GAO Tengyun

Expand

1. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China;
2. Forage Feeding Station of Henan, Zhengzhou 450008, China;
3. Nanyang Animal Husbandry Technology Extension Station, Nanyang 473000, China;
4. Kerqin Cattle Industry Nanyang Co., Ltd., Xinye 473500, China

Received date: 2019-02-27

Online published: 2019-09-17

Fold

Abstract

The study was conducted to investigate the effects of roughage combination of different types of corn silage on growth performance, nutrient apparent digestibility and serum biochemical indexes of Simmental crossbred cattle. A total of 180 healthy Simmental crossbred cattle[(420±40) kg] were randomly divided into 4 groups that were fed different rations:group A (sweet corn straw silage+peanut seedling), group B (corn straw silage+peanut seedling), group C (whole silage corn +peanut seedling) and group D (whole silage corn+peanut seedling+wheat straw), respectively. The experiment period included a pre-trial period of 15 days and a trial period of 90 days. The results showed as follows:1) the average daily gain in group C was significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05), that in groups A and D was significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05); average daily feed intake in group C was higher than that in other groups, but had no significant difference (P>0.05); feed/gain in group C was the lowest, and was significantly lower than that in group B (P<0.05), bud had no significant difference with groups A and D (P>0.05).2) The apparent digestibilities of dry matter, neutral detergent fiber, crude protein, ether extract and total energy in group C were significantly higher than those in group B (P<0.05). The apparent digestibility of acid detergent fiber in group A was significantly higher than that in group C, but no significant difference (P>0.05). 3) The serum globulin/albumin in groups B and C was significantly higher than that in group A (P<0.05), and the content of serum free fatty acids in groups A and B was significantly higher than that in groups C and D (P<0.05). The activity of serum lactate dehydrogenase in group B was significantly higher than that in groups C and D (P<0.05). In conclusion, this experiment shows that feeding whole corn silage can significantly improve the digestibility of feed and reduce the feed/gain of beef cattle. Feeding sweet corn stalk silage can improve the digestibility of feed than corn straw silage; the feeding effect of wheat straw instead of whole corn silage is worse than that of whole corn silage.

Key words： beef cattle; corn silage; growth performance; apparent digestibility; serum biochemical indexes

Cite this article

XUE Xiao , NIU Yan , CAI Amin , ZHANG Xiaoxia , TENG Zhanwei , WANG Jianqin , QIN Haidong , LI Pengfei , GAO Tengyun . Effects of Roughage Combination of Different Types of Corn Silage on Growth Performance, Nutrient Apparent Digestibility and Serum Biochemical Indexes of Beef Cattle[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019 , 31(9) : 4070 -4079 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.09.019

References

[1] ZOBELL D R,OLSON K C,WIEDMEIER R D,et al.Effects of processed corn silage on its digestibility and production of growing beef replacement heifers[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2002,96(3/4):221-228.
[2] 李欣泽,艾尼瓦尔·艾山,崔卫东,等.不同品种甜玉米秸秆青贮饲料感官指标的比较分析[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2016(2):130-132.
[3] 王笑笑,廉红霞,秦雯霄,等.花生秧与玉米青贮配比对奶牛生产性能、血液指标及氮素利用的影响[J].草业学报,2016,25(5):165-174.
[4] ABDULRAZAK S A,MUINGA R W,THORPE W,et al.Supplementation with Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala on voluntary food intake,digestibility,rumen fermentation and live weight of crossbred steers offered Zea mays stover[J].Livestock Production Science,1997,49(1):53-62.

[5] 秦利.花生秧、壳在饲料行业中的应用现状[J].草业科学,2011,28(11):2057-2060.
[6] 张峰,李魁英,王学清,等.不同品种花生秧营养价值分析[J].河北农业科学,2010,14(7):72-73.
[7] NOLAN J V,NORTON B W,LENG R A.Further studies of the dynamics of nitrogen metabolism in sheep[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1976,35(1):127-147.

[8] 张一为,赵国先,孙少华,等.全株玉米青贮与花生秧间组合效应的研究[J].饲料研究,2015(9):38-41.
[9] 秦雯霄,廉红霞,付彤,等.玉米青贮与花生秧配比对奶牛瘤胃中花生秧降解特性的影响[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(6):1928-1935.
[10] 中华人民共和国农业部.NY/T 815-2004肉牛饲养标准[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.
[11] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6435-2014饲料中水分的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2015.
[12] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6433-2006饲料中粗脂肪的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.
[13] 国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6432-2018饲料中粗蛋白的测定凯氏定氮法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
[14] 庄文昌,闫繁华,王欲晓.氧弹式量热法测定农业秸秆的燃烧热[J].科教导刊,2014(4):187-188.
[15] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 20806-2006饲料中中性洗涤纤维(NDF)的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[16] 中华人民共和国农业部.NY/T 1459-2007饲料中酸性洗涤纤维的测定[S].北京:农业出版社,2008.
[17] 霍启光,李建文,张玉凤,等.酸不溶灰分在奶山羊消化试验中的应用[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),1982(3):57-64.
[18] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 23742-2009饲料中盐酸不溶灰分的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
[19] 袁翠林,于子洋,王文丹,等.豆秸、花生秧和青贮玉米秸间的组合效应研究[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(2):647-654.
[20] 孙雪丽,李秋凤,刘英财,等.全株青贮玉米对西门塔尔杂交牛生产性能、表观消化率及血液生化指标的影响[J].草业学报,2018,27(9):201-209.
[21] 薛莉萍,郑爱华,马平.全株玉米青贮饲料饲喂肉牛增重效果试验[J].中国牛业科学,2013,39(1):18-20.
[22] 苏秀侠,于秀芳,刘海燕.不同玉米品种对秸秆青贮饲料品质及适口性的影响[C]//动物营养与饲料研究——第五届全国饲料营养学术研讨会论文集.珠海:中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会,2006:133.
[23] 王晋莉,杨瑞娥,高照平.不同处理玉米秸育肥肉牛效果比较[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,28(3):320-323,337.
[24] 许向莉.不同农作物处理方法饲喂肉牛效果对比试验[J].甘肃畜牧兽医,2015,45(1):41-42.
[25] 王学君,周永亮,徐泽立,等.全株玉米青贮与黄贮对湖羊公羔育肥效果试验研究[J].当代畜牧,2017(9):21-22.
[26] 和立文.全株玉米青贮品质评价及其对肉牛育肥性能和牛肉品质的影响[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2017:71-83.
[27] LI Z F,SUGINO T,OBITSU T,et al.Effects of dietary combination of corn and rice as whole crop silage and grain sources on carbohydrate digestion and nitrogen use in steers[J].Animal Science Journal,2014,85(2):127-134.

[28] CARVALHO J R R,CHIZZOTTI M L,SCHOONMAKER J P,et al.Performance,carcass characteristics,and ruminal pH of Nellore and Angus young bulls fed a whole shelled corn diet[J].Journal of Animal Science,2016,94(6):2451-2459.

[29] 穆秀明,闫贵龙,曹春梅,等.饲喂糯玉米秸秆对奶牛产奶量和乳品质的影响[J].饲料研究,2012(10):46-48.
[30] 韩建成,周汉林,江杨,等.甜玉米秸秆对雷州黑山羊生长性能及血液生化指标的影响[J].养殖与饲料,2017(10):16-19.
[31] 高立鹏,涂远璐,白云峰,等.日粮中不同纤维来源对山羊生长性能及养分消化率的影响[J].饲料研究,2015(20):33-36.
[32] COOK D E,BENDER R W,SHINNERS K J,et al.The effects of calcium hydroxide-treated whole-plant and fractionated corn silage on intake,digestion,and lactation performance in dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2016,99(7):5385-5393.

[33] CARVALHO J R R,SCHOONMAKER J P,CHIZZOTTI M L,et al.Total nutrient digestibility and small intestine starch digestion in Nellore and Angus young bulls fed a whole shelled corn diet[J].Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition,2019,103(1):8-16.

[34] 胡宗福,常杰,萨仁呼,等.基于宏基因组学技术检测全株玉米青贮期间和暴露空气后的微生物多样性[J].动物营养学报,2017,29(10):3750-3760.
[35] 韩建成,江杨,江汉青,等.我国南方地区甜玉米秸秆资源有效利用研究进展[J].当代畜牧,2017(7):72-75.
[36] HATEW B,BANNINK A,VAN LAAR H,et al.Increasing harvest maturity of whole-plant corn silage reduces methane emission of lactating dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2016,99(1):354-368.

[37] 付清茂.收获时间、贮存时间及添加剂对玉米秸秆营养价值的影响[D].硕士学位论文.乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2008:21-34.
[38] 甘洁.不同品种及生育期玉米秸秆体外发酵特性和尼龙袋降解率的研究[D].硕士学位论文.长沙:湖南农业大学,2007:20-48.
[39] ZENG B,SUN J J,CHEN T,et al.Effects of Moringa oleifera silage on milk yield,nutrient digestibility and serum biochemical indexes of lactating dairy cows[J].Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition,2018,102(1):75-81.

[40] 张亚格,胡海超,施力光,等.不同配比粗饲料对海南黑山羊生长、养分消化及血液生化指标的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2018,45(11):3086-3094.
[41] WANG B,ZHAO F Q,ZHANG B X,et al.An insufficient glucose supply causes reduced lactose synthesis in lactating dairy cows fed rice straw instead of alfalfa hay[J].Journal of Animal Science,2016,94(11):4771-4780.

[42] 李胜开.南方农副产品混合青贮饲料的营养价值评定及对肉牛生长性能和血液生化指标的影响[D].硕士学位论文.南宁:广西大学,2017:37-39.
[43] HE Y,NIU W J,QIU Q H,et al.Effect of calcium salt of long-chain fatty acids and alfalfa supplementation on performance of Holstein bulls[J].Oncotarget,2017,9(3):3029-3042.
[44] HAN Z Y,YANG B K,YANG Z,et al.Effects of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid isopropyl ester on growth and blood components in growing Holstein steers[J].Animal Science Journal,2017,88(2):286-293.

[45] ANDRAE J G,HUNT C W,PRITCHARD G T,et al.Effect of hybrid,maturity,and mechanical processing of corn silage on intake and digestibility by beef cattle[J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,79(9):2268-2275.

[46] LISTER E E,FISHER L J,JORDAN W A,et al.Influence of shelter,level of feeding,and method of forage conservation on packed cell volume and plasma metabolite levels in pregnant beef cows[J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1973,53(1):81-88.

[47] ZHANG H B,ZHANG X F,WANG Z S,et al.Effects of dietary energy level on lipid metabolism-related gene expression in subcutaneous adipose tissue of Yellow breed×Simmental cattle[J].Animal Science Journal,2015,86(4):392-400.

[48] 阿依努尔·托合提,何宗霖,郭同军,等.不同饲养条件对西门塔尔牛体重变化和部分血清生化指标的影响[J].中国草食动物科学,2014,34(4):23-25,30.

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References