Differences of Pig Intestinal Microbes on Amino Acid Disappearance Rates of Protein Feed Sources with Different Molecular Structure

  • HU Hong ,
  • LIU Jinyan ,
  • SUN Weizhong ,
  • SUN Zhihong ,
  • TANG Zhiru
Expand
  • Key Laboratory for Bio-Feed and Molecular Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Received date: 2019-05-10

  Online published: 2019-12-13

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the differences of pig intestinal microbes on amino acid disappearance rates of protein feed sources (soybean protein, soybean peptide and monomeric amino acid) with different molecular structure. Three about 30 kg healthy growing pigs were selected and slaughtered, 50 mL jejunum, ileum and cecal digesta were sterile collected into 500 mL anaerobic basal medium, respectively, and jejunum, ileum and cecal microbial suspensions were got by gradient centrifugation. Firstly, 50 mL anaerobic basal medium were added into 250 mL conical flask, and 5 mL jejunal microbial suspension were inoculate into 50 mL preheated anaerobic basal medium. After cultured for 4 h, 5 mL jejunal culture medium were taken for the determination of amino acids contents and enzymes activities and 5 mL ileal microbial suspension were inoculate into the above culture medium. Secondly, after cultured for another 4 h, 5 mL ileal culture medium were taken for the determination of amino acid contents and enzyme activities and 5 mL cecal microbial suspension were inoculate into the above culture medium. After cultured for another 4 h, 5 mL cecal culture medium were taken for the determination of amino acid contents and enzyme activities. The experiment consisted of 3 groups, soybean protein group (basal medium+soybean protein+microbes), soybean peptide group (basal medium+soybean peptide+microbes) and monomeric amino acid group (basal medium+monomeric amino acid+microbes), and 1 negative control group (basal medium+microbes) and 3 positive control groups (basal medium+soybean protein, basal medium+soybean peptide and basic medium+monomeric amino acids) were also consisted, and each group had 3 replicates. The results showed that the activities of lysine decarboxylase, arginine decarboxylase, histidine decarboxylase, glycine decarboxylase, tyrosine decarboxylase, glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase, glutamic-pyruvic transaminase and adenosine deaminase of protein feed sources with 3 different molecular structure were affected significantly by jejunum, ileum or cecal microbes (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The enzyme activities in monomeric amino acid group were higher overall than those in the other two groups. The enzyme activities in 3 groups were not completely consistent with the disappearance rate of amino acids. There were extremely significant differences in amino acid disappearance rates of protein feed sources with different molecular structure cultured in different intestinal microbes (P<0.01). The disappearance rate of amino acids in soybean protein group ranged from high to low:cecum, jejunum, ileum. The disappearance rate of amino acids in soybean peptide and monomeric amino acid groups with simple structure ranged from high to low:ileum, cecum, jejunum. The disappearance rate of total amino acids in soybean protein group was the highest. In conclusion, in vitro cultivation of intestinal microbes, the disappearance rate of amino acids among 3 protein feed sources with different molecular structure are different, and intestinal microbes are more active in protein decomposition of soybean.

Cite this article

HU Hong , LIU Jinyan , SUN Weizhong , SUN Zhihong , TANG Zhiru . Differences of Pig Intestinal Microbes on Amino Acid Disappearance Rates of Protein Feed Sources with Different Molecular Structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019 , 31(12) : 5672 -5681 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.12.033

References

[1] HOLDEN P J,ENSMINGER M E.养猪学[M].王爱国译.7版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007:105-251.
[2] WU G Y,BAZER F W,DAI Z L,et al.Amino acid nutrition in animals:protein synthesis and beyond[J].Annual Review of Animal Biosciences,2014,2(1):387-417.  
[3] WU G Y,WU Z L,DAI Z L,et al.Dietary requirements of "nutritionally non-essential amino acids" by animals and humans[J].Amino Acids,2013,44(4):1107-1113.  
[4] WU G Y.Dietary requirements of synthesizable amino acids by animals:a paradigm shift in protein nutrition[J].Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology,2014,5:34.
[5] 张京.猪小肠氨基酸代谢菌的分离和鉴定[D].硕士学位论文.南京:南京农业大学,2009:1-47.
[6] 卫旭彪,张璐璐,斯大勇,等.肠道菌群对氨基酸的分解及其产物对宿主的作用[J].饲料工业,2017,38(16):41-44.
[7] 谭碧娥,王婧,印遇龙.仔猪肠道发育和氨基酸营养调控机制[J].农业现代化研究,2018,39(6):970-976.
[8] 张福哲.体外培养猪大肠微生物对蛋氨酸和苯丙氨酸的代谢特性研究[D].硕士学位论文.南京:南京农业大学,2015:1-21.
[9] LOOFT T,ALLEN H K,CANTAREL B L,et al.Bacteria,phages and pigs:the effects of in-feed antibiotics on the microbiome at different gut locations[J].International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal,2014,8(8):1566-1576.
[10] JI Y J,GUO Q P,YIN Y L,et al.Dietary proline supplementation alters colonic luminal microbiota and bacterial metabolite composition between days 45 and 70 of pregnancy in Huanjiang mini-pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology,2018,9:18.
[11] 印遇龙.猪氨基酸营养与代谢[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:129-130.
[12] 邓敦,王米.小肽在单胃动物中的研究与应用[J].饲料研究,2005(1):1-3.
[13] DAI Z L,ZHANG J,WU G Y,et al.Utilization of amino acids by bacteria from the pig small intestine[J].Amino Acids,2010,39(5):1201-1215.  
[14] 唐志如,邓欢,孙志洪,等.一种快速定量检测氨基酸脱羧酶的比色方法:中国,201410444552[P].2014-09-03.
[15] 赖星,石宝石,刘金艳,等.日粮蛋白水平对生长育肥猪肠道微生物酶活性的影响[J].中国兽医学报,2017,37(2):327-334.
[16] 曹克飞.不同氮源对猪肠道微生物多样性及主要产蛋白酶菌株的影响[D].硕士学位论文.长春:吉林农业大学,2016:1-15.
[17] TRÖSCHER-MUBOTTER J,TILOCCA B,STEFANSKI V,et al.Analysis of the bacterial and host proteins along and across the porcine gastrointestinal tract[J].Proteomes,2019,7(1):E4.
[18] 杨宇翔.消化道微生物对猪和大鼠氨基酸代谢的影响[D].博士学位论文.南京:南京农业大学,2016:1-97.
[19] 戴兆来.猪小肠微生物氨基酸代谢的生态学分析[D].博士学位论文.南京:南京农业大学,2010:1-118.
[20] ISAACSON R,KIM H B.The intestinal microbiome of the pig[J].Animal Health Research Reviews,2012,13(1):100-109.  
[21] 饶辉.影响断奶仔猪胃肠道pH值及胃蛋白酶活性的因素[J].猪业科学,2008(6):58-60.
[22] DAI Z L,LI X L,XI P B,et al.Metabolism of select amino acids in bacteria from the pig small intestine[J].Amino Acids,2012,42(5):1597-1608.  
[23] 武振龙,伍国耀.猪蛋白质营养与代谢研究的新发现和展望[J].中国畜牧杂志,2018,54(7):1-5.
[24] 余凯凡,张福哲,朱伟云.猪不同肠段微生物体外培养对蛋氨酸的代谢特性[J].微生物学报,2018,58(5):784-792.
[25] 戴求仲,印遇龙,王康宁,等.生长猪内脏器官氨基酸代谢及其营养调控研究[C]//中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第九届学术研讨会.重庆:中国畜牧兽医学会,2004:250-260.
[26] 刘颖.梅山猪不同发育阶段肠道微生物变化及免疫调控机制分析[D].博士学位论文.扬州:扬州大学,2018:91-102.
[27] LAMENDELLA R,DOMINGO J W S,GHOSH S,et al.Comparative fecal metagenomics unveils unique functional capacity of the swine gut[J].BMC Microbiology,2011,11:103.
Outlines

/