Effects of Different Levels of Pea in Diets on Performance, Egg Quality and Organ Indexes of Layers

SHAO Caimei; ZHANG Xin; GUO Yaoqi; LI Yihong; ZHANG Weihui; WANG Yulin

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.12.041

Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition >

2019 , Vol. 31 >Issue 12: 5750 - 5759

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.12.041

Effects of Different Levels of Pea in Diets on Performance, Egg Quality and Organ Indexes of Layers

SHAO Caimei ,
ZHANG Xin ,
GUO Yaoqi ,
LI Yihong ,
ZHANG Weihui ,
WANG Yulin

Expand

Liaoning Wellhope Agri-Tech Joint Stock Co., Ltd., Shenyang 110866, China

Received date: 2019-05-28

Online published: 2019-12-13

Fold

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of different level of peas in diets on performance, egg quality, feces state and organ indexes of layers. A total of 1 620 healthy Hyline brown layers of 355-day-old with similar body weight were randomly assigned to 3 groups with 6 replicates per group and 90 layers per replicate. Layers in control group were fed a basal diet, and the others in experimental groups were fed the experimental diets of 15% pea replaced 7.5% corn and 7.5% soybean meal (15% pea group), and 30% pea replaced 15% corn and 15% soybean meal (30% pea group), respectively. The experiment lasted for 60 days and feed intake 125 g/d per layer. The results showed as follows:1) laying rate and egg production of layers in 30% pea group were significantly lower than those in control group and 15% pea group (P<0.05), but the ratio of feed to egg was significantly higher than that in control group and 15% pea group (P<0.05). There was significant difference in average egg weight among groups (P<0.05), average egg weight was significantly decreased with the increasing of pea supplemented level (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in body weight among groups (P>0.05), body weight loss in 15% pea group was lower than that in control group, and body weight loss in 30% pea group was higher than that in control group. 2) There were no significant differences in eggshell thickness, eggshell strength, eggshell ratio, broken egg rate, egg yolk ratio and egg yolk index of layers among groups (P>0.05). Haugh unit and albumen height in 30% pea group were significantly lower than those in control group and 15% pea group (P<0.05). Egg yolk color in 30% pea group was significantly higher than that in control group and 15% pea group (P<0.05), and egg yolk color in 15% pea group was significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05). Eggshell color in 15% pea group was better than that in control group, and eggshell color in 30% pea group was the worst. 3) Feces state of layers in 15% pea group was significantly better than that in 30% pea group in the forth feces grade (P<0.05). 4) Duodenum index of layers in 30% pea group was significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05), and gastrointestinal index, intestine relative length, relative length and weight of oviduct in 15% and 30% pea groups were higher than those in control group. In summary, adding 15% pea in diets has no significant effects on performance and egg quality of layers, and is better for fecal formation, and adding 30% pea in diets has significant effect on performance of layers, decrease egg quality, and is bad for fecal formation. The pea is beneficial to the growth of gastrointestinal tract and oviduct, and it is suggested that equivalent corn and soybean meal is replaced with 15% pea in diets of layers.

Key words： pea; layer; performance; egg quality; feces state; organ indexes

Cite this article

SHAO Caimei , ZHANG Xin , GUO Yaoqi , LI Yihong , ZHANG Weihui , WANG Yulin . Effects of Different Levels of Pea in Diets on Performance, Egg Quality and Organ Indexes of Layers[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019 , 31(12) : 5750 -5759 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.12.041

References

[1] LAUDADIO V,NAHASHON S N,TUFARELLI V.Growth performance and carcass characteristics of guinea fowl broilers fed micronized-dehulled pea (Pisum Sativum L.) as a substitute for soybean meal[J].Poultry Science,2012,91(11):2988-2996.

[2] THACKER P,DEEP A,PETRI D,et al.Nutritional evaluation of low-phytate peas (Pisum sativum L.) for young broiler chicks[J].Archives of Animal Nutrition,2013,67(1):1-14.

[3] 孙冬阳,呼鑫荣,薛文通.豌豆功效成分及其生理活性的研究进展[J].食品工业科技,2019,40(2):316-320.
[4] 李岫怡,杨桂芹,郭东新.不同来源淀粉的组成、结构及其在动物生产上的应用研究进展[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(3):1053-1060.
[5] 周根来,张伟,殷洁鑫,等.豌豆蛋白粉和大豆粕的营养成分及氨基酸全肠表观消化率分析[J].中国畜牧杂志,2018,54(9):83-88.
[6] 李存花,祁正梅,孙应花.日粮豌豆皮添加水平对肉仔鸡生长性能、养分消化率及胃肠道发育的影响[J].中国饲料,2018(20):41-45.
[7] CARLOS A,MONTOYA L,PASCAL L.豌豆颗粒的大小对生长猪可消化能的影响[J].饲料博览,2012(5):13.
[8] 王强,何文锋,姚志勇,等.用豌豆代替部分豆粕饲喂肉猪的效果试验[J].广东饲料,2006,15(1):11-12.
[9] 中国饲料数据库.中国饲料成分及营养价值表(2018年第29版)[J].中国饲料,2018(21):64-73.
[10] SELLE P H,RAVINDRAN V.Microbial phytase in poultry nutrition[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2007,135(1/2):1-41.
[11] HUISMAN J,VAN DER POEL T F B,LIENER I E.Recent advances of research in antinutritional factors in legume seeds[J].Pudoc Wageningen,1989:118-120.
[12] RAVINDRAN G,NALLE C L,MOLAN A,et al.Nutritional and biochemical assessment of field peas (Pisum sativum L.) as a protein source in poultry diets[J].The Journal of Poultry Science,2010,47(1):48-52.

[13] 席鹏彬,李德发,龚利敏.豌豆在生长猪日粮中应用效果的研究[J].粮食与饲料工业,2001,1(2):42-43.
[14] GROSJEAN F,BARRIER-GUILLOT B,BASTIANELLI D,et al.Feeding value of three categories of pea (Pisum sativum,L.) for poultry[J].Animal Science,1999,69(3):591-599.

[15] IGBASAN F A,GUENTER W.The influence of feeding yellow-,green- and brown- seeded peas on production performance of laying hens[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1997,73(1):120-128.

[16] IVUSIC S I,MIROSH L W,NAKAUE H S.Productivity of laying pullets fed diets containing yellow peas (Pisum sativum L. var. Miranda)[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1994,45(2):205-210.

[17] FRU-NJI F,NIESS E,PFEFFER E.Effect of graded replacement of soybean meal by faba beans (Vicia faba L.) or field peas (Pisum sativum L.) in rations for laying hens on egg production and quality[J].The Journal of Poultry Science,2007,44(1):34-41.

[18] 石永峰,张毅铭.豆类在产蛋鸡日粮中的应用[J].西部粮油科技,2003,28(3):65-66.
[19] 王润莲,南玉琴.豌豆和亚麻饼对生长蛋鸡的饲养效果[J].粮食与饲料工业,2000(6):42-43.
[20] 杨露,刘松柏,赵江涛,等.玉米蛋白粉的营养价值及其在家禽饲料中应用研究进展[J].粮食与饲料工业,2018(11):58-61.
[21] 杨军,韩文红.粪便状态——消化道问题首要线索[J].畜牧兽医科技信息,2009(11):47.
[22] 吕颜枝.观察鸡粪诊治鸡病[J].养禽与禽病防治,2015(3):22.
[23] 张乾元,韩冬,李铎.黄豌豆营养成分和功能研究进展[J].食品科技,2012,37(6):141-144.
[24] 周根来,杨晓志,殷洁鑫,等.豌豆蛋白粉对1-4周龄高邮鸭生长性能、养分表观消化率、消化器官发育及血清生化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2017,29(10):3648-3656.
[25] 相振田.饲粮不同来源淀粉对断奶仔猪肠道功能和健康的影响及机理研究[D].博士学位论文.雅安:四川农业大学,2011.
[26] HEDEMANN M S,BACH KNUDSEN K E.Resistant starch for weaning pigs-effect on concentration of short chain fatty acids in digesta and intestinal morphology[J].Livestock Science,2007,108(1/2/3):175-177.

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References