Nutritive Value of Lotus Receptacle as Roughage for Mutton Sheep and Goats and Its Feeding Value in Different Mutton Sheep and Goat Breeds

  • LI Wenyang ,
  • WU Xianfeng ,
  • HUANG Qinlou ,
  • LIU Yuan
Expand
  • 1. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350013, China;
    2. Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350001, China

Received date: 2020-04-30

  Online published: 2020-10-22

Abstract

In order to study the utilizability of lotus receptacle (LR) as feed for mutton sheep and goats, the common nutrient contents of LB were analyzed, and the in vivo digestion and metabolism tests for different mutton sheep and goat breeds were carried. A two-factor 3×4 randomized block design was used in the in vivo digestion and metabolism test, the first factor was mutton sheep and goats breed (Hu sheep, Nubia goats and Fuqing goats) and the second factor was substitution proportion of basal diet by LB (0, 20%, 40% and 60%). Twelve 7- to 8-months-old and healthy wethers of each mutton sheep and goat breed with similar body weight were selected and divided into 4 groups with 3 wethers per group and they were fed in a homemade digestion and metabolism cage alone. The diets in different groups were as follows: a basal diet (forage ∶ concentrate ratio was 3 ∶ 7) and three experimental diets (the basal diet was replaced by lotus receptacle at 20%, 40% and 60%). Nutrient apparent digestibility of four diets were measured by total collection of feces and urine. Then calculated nutrient apparent digestibility and effective energy values of LR in three experimental diets. The results showed as follows: 1) gross energy (GE), digestive energy (DE), metabolic energy (ME), and the contents of crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), ash (Ash), calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) [dry matter (DM) basis] were 16.95 MJ/kg, 7.86 MJ/kg, 6.45 MJ/kg, 8.00%, 10.00 g/kg, 73.25%, 53.00%, 24.72%, 6.20%, 0.41% and 0.15%, respectively. 2) Mutton sheep and goats breed had extremely significant effects on the apparent digestibility of DM, GE and ADF of diets (P<0.01), and had significant effects on the apparent digestibility of OM and NDF of diets (P<0.05), the best digestive ability of nutrients of diet was found in Nubia goats. The substitution proportion of LR had extremely significant effects on the apparent digestibility of 6 common nutrients of diet (P<0.01), and the apparent digestibility of DM, OM, CP, GE and NDF was decreased with the increase of the substitution proportion of LR. The interaction of 2 factors had no significant effects all nutrient apparent digestibility of diets (P>0.05). 3) Except for the substitution proportion of LR had extremely significant effects on the apparent digestibility of ADF of LR (P<0.01), and two factors and their interaction had no significant effects all nutrient apparent digestibility of LR (P>0.05). 4) Mutton sheep and goats breed had extremely significant effects on the fecal nitrogen, nitrogen retention, nitrogen retention rate and nitrogen biological value (P<0.01), and the nitrogen retention of Nubia goats was significantly higher than that of Hu sheep and Fuqing goats (P<0.05); the substitution proportion of LR had extremely significant effects on the fecal nitrogen, nitrogen retention, nitrogen retention rate (P<0.01), and had significant effects on the urine nitrogen and nitrogen biological value (P<0.05). nitrogen biological value in 20% substitution group was the highest, followed by 40% substitution group, both of which were significantly higher than that in 60% substitution group (P<0.05). The interaction of 2 factors had significant effects on urine nitrogen (P<0.05). 5) The forage grading index (GI) value of LR was 0.69, and it belonged to level 5. Based on the results of this study, LR can be used as the roughage of mutton sheep and goats. As the ADL content of LR is higher and forage GI value is lower, it should not be more than 40% in the diet of mutton sheep and goats. Mutton sheep and goats breed and the substitution proportion of LR have little effect on the digestibility and utilization rate of nutrients in LR. The digestibility and utilization rate of nutrients in diet for Nubia goat is better than Hu sheep and Fuqing goats when they are fed the same nutrient level diet.

Cite this article

LI Wenyang , WU Xianfeng , HUANG Qinlou , LIU Yuan . Nutritive Value of Lotus Receptacle as Roughage for Mutton Sheep and Goats and Its Feeding Value in Different Mutton Sheep and Goat Breeds[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020 , 32(10) : 4931 -4942 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.10.044

References

[1] 任继周,李发弟,曹建民,等.我国牛羊肉产业的发展现状、挑战与出路[J].中国工程科学,2019,21(5):67-73.
[2] 王泳,张英杰.植物性非常规饲料在反刍动物上的应用研究进展[J].中国草食动物科学,2018,38(2):61-65.
[3] 何静,吴磊,李鹏霞,等.莲蓬壳提取物不同极性部位的生物活性[J].江苏农业学报,2015,31(3):679-684.
[4] 汪媛,毛惠婷,纪俊玲,等.大孔树脂对莲蓬壳染料原花青素的吸附性能及纯化工艺研究[J].离子交换与吸附,2018,34(5):442-452.
[5] 胡卫成,王新风,沈婷,等.响应面试验优化莲蓬壳总黄酮超声提取条件及其抗氧化活性[J].食品科学,2015,36(24):51-56.
[6] 张露,黄祥霞,涂宗财,等.5种莲副产物中活性成分及其抗氧化、α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制活性比较[J].食品科学,2018,39(9):33-38.
[7] 谢三都,林雅男,黄晓美.莲蓬醇提物中槲皮素的鉴定及生物活性[J].食品与机械,2016,32(6):44-48.
[8] 朱莉娜,曹伟娜.莲蓬壳色素的提取及其对真丝绸染色性能研究[J].印染助剂,2018,35(1):31-36.
[9] 孙杰,韩苗苗,龚超,等.莲蓬膳食纤维的高温改性及其理化和应用特性研究[J].食品工业科技,2017,38(2):141-145.
[10] 王盛华,朱丹晨,邵敬爱,等.MgO改性莲蓬壳生物炭的制备及其磷吸附特性[J].环境科学,2019,40(11):4987-4995.
[11] NRC.Nutrient requirements of small ruminants:sheep,goats,cervids,and new world camelids[S].Washington,D.C.:The National Academies Press,2007.
[12] 赵明明,杨开伦,邓凯东,等.直接法与替代法测定羊草对肉用绵羊代谢能的比较研究[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(2):436-443.
[13] 国家技术监督局.GB/T 6432-1994饲料中粗蛋白测定方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1994.
[14] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6433-2006饲料中粗脂肪的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.
[15] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T 6437-2002饲料中总磷的测定分光光度法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
[16] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 13885-2017饲料中钙、铜、铁、镁、锰、钾、钠和锌含量的测定原子吸收光谱法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
[17] VAN SOEST P J.Development of a comprehensive system of feed analyses and its application to forages[J].Journal of Animal Science,1967,26(1):119-128.  
[18] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 20805-2006饲料中酸性洗涤木质素(ADL)的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[19] ADEOLA O.Digestion and balance techniques in pigs[M]//LEWIS A J,SOUTHERN L L.Swine nutrition.2nd ed.Washington,D.C.:CRC Press,2001:903-916.
[20] 王世琴,张乃锋,邓凯东,等.甘蔗梢对肉羊的饲用价值评定[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(3):1146-1154.
[21] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T23387-2009饲草营养品质评定GI法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
[22] 陈艳,王之盛,张晓明,等.常用粗饲料营养成分和饲用价值分析[J].草业学报,2015,24(5):117-125.
[23] 赵明明,马涛,赵江波,等.花生秧作为肉用绵羊单一粗饲料有效能值的测定与估测[J].动物营养学报2017,29(11):4162-4170.
[24] 刘远,吴贤锋,陈鑫珠,等.大米草对福清山羊饲用价值评定[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(11):5301-5309.
[25] 张吉鹍.粗饲料分级指数参数的模型化及粗饲料科学搭配的组合效应研究[D].博士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2005.
[26] 袁翠林,于子洋,王文丹,等.山东省羊常用粗饲料营养价值评定[J].草业学报,2015,24(6):220-226.
[27] 李文杨,陈鑫珠,刘远,等.福建省可用饲草料资源营养价值研究[J].中国草食动物科学,2017,37(6):24-27.
[28] 赵江波,马涛,聂明非,等.反刍动物饲料营养价值评定及替代法展望[J].畜牧与兽医,2016,48(4):134-137.
[29] 赵江波.肉用绵羊精料代谢能预测模型的研究[D].硕士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2016.
[30] 姜雨轩,张美美,孙悠然,等.直接法与替代法测定肉羊氨化秸秆代谢能值的比较研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2018,45(6):1493-1501.
[31] 庄一民,解彪,黄文琴,等.香蕉茎叶青贮对山羊羔羊生长、营养物质表观消化率及血清指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(12):5792-5800.
[32] 黄文琴,吕小康,王世琴,等.全株甘蔗对山羊生长性能、营养物质表观消化率、血清指标及瘤胃发酵参数的影响[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(12):5182-5191.
[33] LOURENÇO A L,CONE J W,FONTES P,et al.Effects of ambient temperature and soybean meal supplementation on intake and digestion of two sheep breeds differing in mature size[J].Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition,2010,94(5):571-583.  
[34] RANILLA M J,CARRO M D,VALDÉS C,et al.A comparative study of ruminal activity in Churra and Merino sheep offered alfalfa hay[J].Animal Science,1997,65(1):121-128.  
[35] GOMES M J.Efficiency of utilization of fibrous-feeds offered to native sheep breed Churra da Terra Quente-supplementation and genotype as sources of variation[D].Ph.D.Thesis.Portugal:Trá-os-Montes e Alto Douro University,2001:406.
Outlines

/