Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Bacillus licheniformis on Growth Performance and Nutrient Digestion and Metabolism in Sheep

  • ZHENG Weicai ,
  • HAO Xiaoyan ,
  • ZHANG Hongxiang ,
  • CHEN Yanhua ,
  • HE Jifeng ,
  • GUO Muyun ,
  • ZHANG Jianxin
Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China;
    2. Shanxi Xianghelingshang Farm Animal Husbandry Development Co., Ltd., Youyu 037200, China;
    3. Shanxi Anhong Testing Technology Co., Ltd., Taiyuan 030008, China

Received date: 2020-04-05

  Online published: 2020-11-16

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to study the effects of dietary supplementation of Saccharomy cescerevisiae and Bacillus licheniformis on growth performance, nutrient digestion and metabolism and energy metabolism in sheep. A total of 48 four-month-old healthy Dorper×Small Tail Han lambs with similar body weight of (22.96±2.00) kg were randomly divided into 4 groups: D (the control group, fed a basal diet); D1 (only 6×1010 CFU/kg Saccharomyces cerevisiae was added to the basal diet), D2 (only 2×1010 CFU/kg Bacillus licheniformis was added to the basal diet) and D3 (6×1010 CFU/kg Saccharomyces cerevisiae+2×1010 CFU/kg Bacillus licheniformis were added to the basal diet), each group with 12 lambs. At end of the experiment, the digestive and metabolic tests were carried out by the method of total fecal collection and urine collection for three days, and the nutrient contents of feces, urinary purine derivatives, and energy were measured. The results showed as follows:1) the addition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Bacillus licheniformis in the diet had no significant effect on the final body weight and daily average feed intake of the test lambs (P>0.05), average daily gain (ADG) of group D3 was significantly higher than that of group D by 20.32% (P<0.05), and feed/gain of group D3 was significantly lower than that of group D (P<0.05). 2) The apparent digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber of group D3 was significantly higher than that of group D (P<0.05). 3) Compared with group D, the apparent digestibility of nitrogen, retained nitrogen and nitrogen deposition rate of group D3 were significantly increased by 12.04%, 41.39% and 40.95%, respectively (P<0.05). 4) The contents of allantoin, xanthine, hypoxanthine and microprotein in the experimental groups were significantly higher than those of group D (P<0.05). The total urine derivatives content of group D3 was significantly higher than that of group D (P<0.05). 5) The fecal energy and urine energy of group D were significantly higher than those of other three groups (P<0.05), and the methane energy of group D was significantly higher than that of group D3 (P<0.05). In conclusion, the dietary supplementation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (6×1010 CFU/kg) and Bacillus licheniformis (2×1010 CFU/kg) has positive effects on nutrient digestion and energy metabolism, improves the utilization of nutrients and energy, improves the growth performance of lambs and promotes animal digestion and absorption. Moreover, the combination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Bacillus licheniformis has better effects.

Cite this article

ZHENG Weicai , HAO Xiaoyan , ZHANG Hongxiang , CHEN Yanhua , HE Jifeng , GUO Muyun , ZHANG Jianxin . Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Bacillus licheniformis on Growth Performance and Nutrient Digestion and Metabolism in Sheep[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020 , 32(11) : 5314 -5321 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.11.036

References

[1] 张民,刁其玉.益生菌的营养和免疫特性及其应用[J].饲料研究,2002(10):6-8.
[2] 乔国华,单安山.直接饲喂微生物培养物对奶牛瘤胃发酵产甲烷及生产性能的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2006,33(5):11-14.
[3] 邵广,李红宇,黄帅,等.酿酒酵母对奶牛瘤胃内环境及血液生化指标的影响[J].中国牛业科学,2011,37(2):24-26.
[4] 张海涛,王加启,卜登攀,等.日粮中添加纳豆枯草芽孢杆菌对犊牛消化道发育的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2010,37(1):5-9.
[5] NRC.Nutrient requirements of small ruminants:sheep,goats,cervids,and new world camelids[S].Washington,D.C.:National Academies Press,2007.
[6] AOAC.Official methods of analysis of AOAC International[S].17th ed.Gaithersburg:AOAC International,2000.
[7] VAN SOEST P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597.  
[8] 邵俊.干、湿法消解-火焰原子吸收法测定多种食品中钙元素的含量[J].化学工程师,2015(11):22-25.
[9] 李会娟.2种植物磷含量的检测方法比较研究[J].现代农业科技,2012(11):16-17.
[10] 杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1993.
[11] BROCKWAY J M,BOYNE A W,GORDON J G.Simultaneous calibration of gas analyzers and meters[J].Journal of Applied Physiology,1971,31(2):296-297.  
[12] CHEN X B,GOMES M J.Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives-an overview of technical details[M].Bucksburn:Occasional Publication,1992.
[13] NAZMI A R,REINISCH T,HINZ H J.Calorimetric studies on renaturation by CaCl2 addition of metal-free α-amylase from Bacillus licheniformis (BLA)[J].Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry,2008,91(1):141-149.  
[14] DAMIANO V B,BOCCHINI D A,GOMES E,et al.Application of crude xylanase from Bacillus licheniformis 77-2 to the bleaching of eucalyptus Kraft pulp[J].World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology,2003,19(2):139-144.  
[15] TOHARISMAN A,SUHARTONO M T,SPINDLER-BARTH M,et al.Purification and characterization of a thermostable chitinase from Bacillus licheniformis Mb-2[J].World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology,2005,21(5):733-738.  
[16] 黄帅.米曲霉和酿酒酵母对奶牛瘤胃发酵及血液生化指标的影响[D].硕士学位论文.大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2011.
[17] 闫晓刚.酵母培养物和颗粒精料对荷斯坦犊牛生长发育的影响[D].硕士学位论文.长春:吉林农业大学,2005.
[18] 付晓政.复合益生菌对奶牛产奶性能、免疫功能及粪便有害气体释放的影响[D].硕士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2014.
[19] 杨春涛,刁其玉,符运勤,等.不同益生菌组合对852周龄后备牛瘤胃发酵和细菌多样性的影响[C]//第七届中国饲料营养学术研讨会论文集.郑州:中国农业大学出版社,2014.
[20] MASUCCIi F,ROSA G D.Effects of Aspergillusoryzae extract and a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on intake, body weight gain and digestibility in buffalo calves[J].Animal Feed Science & Technology,2008,140(1):67-77.
[21] 郑琛.不同处理饲粮及不同组合全饲粮颗粒料对绵羊瘤胃内环境和养分消化代谢的影响[D].硕士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2004.
[22] 耿春银.活性酵母与酵母培养物饲喂育肥牛生长性能、胴体指标和牛肉品质的比较[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2015.
[23] 董晓丽.益生菌的筛选鉴定及其对断奶仔猪、犊牛生长和消化道微生物的影响[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2013.
[24] SANCHEZ P H,TRACEY L N,BROWNE-SILVA J,et al.Propionibacterium acidipropionici P169 and glucogenic precursors improve rumen fermentation of low-quality forage in beef cattle[J].Journal of Animal Science,2014,92(4):1738-1746.  
[25] 许贵善,刁其玉,纪守坤,等.不同饲喂水平对肉用绵羊能量与蛋白质消化代谢的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2012,48(17):40-44.
[26] HAO X Y,DIAO X G,YU S C,et al.Nutrient digestibility,rumen microbial protein synthesis,and growth performance in sheep consuming rations containing sea buckthorn pomace[J].Journal of Animal Science,2018,96(8):3412-3419.  
[27] LEE S S,HA J K,CHENG K J.Influence of an anaerobic fungal culture administration on in vivo ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestion[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2000,88(3/4):201-217.
[28] PUTNAM D E,SCHWAB C G,SOCHA M T,et al.Effect of yeast culture in the diets of early lactation dairy cows on ruminal fermentation and passage of nitrogen fractions and amino acids to the small intestine[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1997,80(2):374-384.  
[29] 刘晓琳,陈乐超,余新京,等.地衣芽孢杆菌对断奶仔猪生产性能的影响[J].广东饲料,2008,17(1):27-28.
[30] HOLTER J B,YOUNG A J.Methane prediction in dry and lactating Holstein cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75(8):2165-2175.  
[31] CHAUCHEYRAS F,FONTY G,GOUET P,et al.Effects of a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Levucell SC),a microbial additive for ruminants,on lactate metabolism in vitro[J].Canadian Journal of Microbiology,1996,42(9):927-933.  
[32] 张菊,李金敏,张志焱,等.地衣芽孢杆菌的研究进展[J].中国饲料,2012(17):9-11.
[33] KIM Y,CHO J Y,KUK J H,et al.Identification and antimicrobial activity of phenylacetic acid produced by Bacillus licheniformis isolated from fermented soybean,Chungkook-Jang[J].Current Microbiology,2004,48(4):312-317.  
Outlines

/