Effects of Different Substitution Ratios of Bamboo Shoot Shell Silage in Diets on Digestion and Metabolism of Mutton Sheep

  • LIU Yuan ,
  • WU Xianfeng ,
  • HUANG Qinlou ,
  • LI Wenyang
Expand
  • 1. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350013, China;
    2. Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350001, China

Received date: 2020-07-05

  Online published: 2020-12-07

Abstract

Common nutrient composition analysis and in vivo digestion tests were used to assess feeding values of bamboo shoot shell silage in Hu sheep, Nubia goats and Fuqing goats. A two factors 3×4 randomized block design was adopted. Three breeds of mutton sheep (Hu sheep, Nubia goats and Fuqing goats) were separately selected twelve healthy growing wethers at 7 months of age, and the body weight were (22.18±1.13) kg, (30.32±1.17) kg and (17.09±0.91) kg, respectively; 12 mutton sheep of each breed were randomly divided into 4 treatments, and fed a basal diet (AC) and experimental diets which replaced the basal diet by 20%(A20), 40%(A40) and 60%(A60) of bamboo shoot shell silage, respectively. Each treatment had 3 replicates and 1 goat per replicate. Total intestinal apparent digestibilities of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), gross energy (GE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) of diets were measured by total collection of feces and urine. The effects of substitution ratios of bamboo shoot shell silage on nutrient apparent digestibility of three breeds of mutton sheep were analyzed, and total intestinal apparent digestibility and effective energy value of nutrients of bamboo shoot shell silage were calculated according to substitution method. The results showed as follows: 1) GE and the contents of CP, ether extract (EE), NDF, ADF, acid detergent lignin (ADL), crude ash (Ash), calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) of bamboo shoot shell silage (DM basis) were 16.99 MJ/kg, 9.89%, 11.00 g/kg, 64.07%, 36.01%, 5.44%, 6.10%, 12.30 mg/kg and 0.14%, respectively. Estimated values of digestive energy (DE) and metabolizable energy (ME) in different breeds of mutton sheep were 6.01 to 9.33 MJ/kg and 4.93 to 7.65 MJ/kg. 2) The total intestinal apparent digestibilities of DM, OM and GE, fecal nitrogen, deposited nitrogen, nitrogen deposition rate and nitrogen biological value of diets were significantly affected by mutton sheep breed (P<0.01). The total intestinal apparent digestibilities of DM, OM, CP, GE, NDF and ADF of diets were significantly affected by substitution ratios of bamboo shoot shell silage (P<0.01). With the increase of substitution ratios of bamboo shoot shell silage in the diets, the digestibility and utilization of protein of diets in Hu sheep and energy substance as NDF and digestion and utilization of protein of diets in other two goat breeds were decreased, respectively. When the substitution ratios of silage shoot shell silage in the diets were less than 40%, Nubia goat had the best CP utilization efficiency, followed by Hu sheep. 3) There was no significant difference in the total intestinal apparent digestibilities of DM, OM, CP, GE, NDF, ADF and estimated values of DE, ME of silage shoot shell silage by mutton sheep breed, substitution ratios of silage shoot shell silage and their interaction (P>0.05). In conclusion, bamboo shoot shell silage is a vegetalitas unconventional feed resource with high feeding value for mutton sheep, as its high CP content, moderate NDF content, low ADF and ADL contents. There are differences in the utilization ratio of bamboo shoot shell silage among different breeds of mutton sheep. When it is used in different breeds, it is necessary to optimize the ration ratio and improve the utilization efficiency.

Cite this article

LIU Yuan , WU Xianfeng , HUANG Qinlou , LI Wenyang . Effects of Different Substitution Ratios of Bamboo Shoot Shell Silage in Diets on Digestion and Metabolism of Mutton Sheep[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020 , 32(12) : 5712 -5723 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.12.025

References

[1] 周兆祥,田荆祥,赖椿根.竹笋壳的化学成分[J].浙江林学院学报,1991,8(1):54-59.
[2] 贾燕芳,石伟勇.几种笋壳的化学成分及其纤维素特征[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2011,37(3):338-342.
[3] 赵丽萍,周振明,任丽萍,等.笋壳作为动物饲料利用研究进展[J].中国畜牧杂志,2013,49(13):77-80.
[4] 曾俊棋,岳万福.笋壳饲用价值研究进展[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2016(4):162-163.
[5] LIU J X,WANG X Q,SHI Z Q,et al.Nutritional evaluation of bamboo shoot shell and its effect as supplementary feed on performance of heifers offered ammoniated rice straw diets[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2000,13(10):1388-1393.  
[6] 王音,沈勇猛,侯冠华.固态发酵笋壳生产饲料菌种混合配比优化研究[J].价值工程,2014,28:316-318.
[7] 丁良,王坚,闻爱友,等.笋壳替代全株玉米TMR发酵品质及有氧稳定性研究[J].草业学报,2016,25(6):158-166.
[8] LIU J X,WANG X Q,SHI Z Q.Addition of rice straw or/and wheat bran on composition,ruminal degradability and voluntary intake of bamboo shoot shells silage fed to sheep[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2001,91(3/4):129-138.
[9] 王兴菊,李周权,唐正菊,等.大叶麻竹笋壳饲用价值的研究[J].四川畜牧兽医,2010(12):30-32.
[10] 国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6432-2018饲料中粗蛋白的测定凯氏定氮法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
[11] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6433-2006饲料中粗脂肪的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.
[12] 国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6437-2018饲料中总磷的测定分光光度法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
[13] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 13885-2017饲料中钙、铜、铁、镁、锰、钾、钠和锌含量的测定原子吸收光谱法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
[14] VAN SOEST P J.Development of a comprehensive system of feed analyses and its application to forages[J].Journal of Animal Science,1967,26(1):119-128.  
[15] NRC.Nutrient requirements of small ruminants:sheep,goats,cervids,and new world camelids[S].Washington,D.C.:National Academies Press,2007.
[16] 刘洁.肉用绵羊饲料代谢能与代谢蛋白质预测模型的研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2012.
[17] 赵江波,马涛,聂明非,等.反刍动物饲料营养价值评定及替代法展望[J].畜牧与兽医,2016,48(4):134-137.
[18] 赵明明.肉用绵羊常用粗饲料原料代谢能的预测模型研究[D].硕士学位论文.乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2016.
[19] ADEOLA O.Digestion and balance techniques in pigs[M]//LEWIS A J,SOUTHERN L L.Swine nutrition.2nd ed.New York:CRC Press,2001:903-916.
[20] 王世琴,张乃锋,邓凯东,等.甘蔗梢对肉羊的饲用价值评定[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(3):1146-1154.
[21] 陈艳,王之盛,张晓明,等.常用粗饲料营养成分和饲用价值分析[J].草业学报,2015,24(5):117-125.
[22] 代胜,王飞,董祥,等.紫花苜蓿与甜高粱混合比例对发酵全混合日粮营养品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J].动物营养学报,2020,32(5):2306-2315.
[23] 杨信,黄勤楼,夏友国,等.六种狼尾草营养成分及瘤胃降解动态研究[J].家畜生态学报,2013,34(5):56-60.
[24] 蔡阿敏,薛宵,赵佳浩,等.春花生秧与夏花生秧的营养价值评价及瘤胃降解率比较[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(4):1823-1832.
[25] 刘远,吴贤锋,陈鑫珠,等.大米草对福清山羊饲用价值评定[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(11):5301-5309.
[26] 赵江波.肉用绵羊精料代谢能预测模型的研究[D].硕士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2016.
[27] 张立涛.25-50 kg杜寒杂交F1代肉用绵羊饲粮NDF适宜水平的研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2013.
[28] VALDÉS C,CARRO M D,RANILLA M J,et al.Effect of forage to concentrate ratio in complete diets offered to sheep on voluntary food intake and some digestive parameters[J].Animal Science,2000,70(1):119-126.  
[29] DE ALMEIDA G A P,DE ANDRADE FERREIRA M,DE LIMA SILVA J,et al.Sugarcane bagasse as exclusive roughage for dairy cows in smallholder livestock system[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2018,31(3):379-385.  
[30] LOURENÇO A L,CONE J W,FONTES P,et al.Effects of ambient temperature and soybean meal supplementation on intake and digestion of two sheep breeds differing in mature size[J].Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition,2010,94(5):571-583.  
[31] RANILLA M J,CARRO M D,VALDÉS C,et al.A comparative study of ruminal activity in Churra and Merino sheep offered alfalfa hay[J].Animal Science,1997,65(1):121-128.  
[32] MANN D L,GOODE L,POND K R.Voluntary intake,gain,digestibility,rate of passage and gastrointestinal tract fill in tropical and temperate breeds of sheep[J].Journal of Animal Science,1987,64(3):880-886.  
[33] GIVENS D I,MOSS A R.Effect of breed,age and bodyweight of sheep on the measurement of apparent digestibility of dried grass[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1994,46(1/2):155-162.
[34] 庄一民,解彪,黄文琴,等.香蕉茎叶青贮对山羊羔羊生长、营养物质表观消化率及血清指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(12):5792-5800.
[35] 黄文琴,吕小康,王世琴,等.全株甘蔗对山羊生长性能、营养物质表观消化率、血清指标及瘤胃发酵参数的影响[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(12):5182-5191.
[36] 姜雨轩,张美美,孙悠然,等.直接法与替代法测定肉羊氨化秸秆代谢能值的比较研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2018,45(6):1493-1501.
Outlines

/