Effects of Different Combinations of Exogenous Enzymes on in Vitro Nutrient Digestibility and Enzymatic Hydrolyzate Gross Energy of Palm Kernel Meal Ingredients

  • ZHANG Shunfen ,
  • ZHONG Ruqing ,
  • ZHANG Bifeng ,
  • LI Tao ,
  • SUN Shudong ,
  • CHEN Liang ,
  • ZHANG Hongfu
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China;
    2. Hunan United-Hope Biotechnology Company, Changsha 410007, China

Received date: 2020-05-25

  Online published: 2020-12-07

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different combinations of exogenous enzymes on in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), in vitro crude protein digestibility (IVCPD), in vitro gross energy digestibility (IVGED) and enzymatic hydrolyzate gross energy (EHGE) of palm kernel meal ingredients using a computer-controlled simulated digestion system (SDS-Ⅱ), and to evaluate the nutritional value of palm kernel meal from two sources [Malaysia palm kernel cake (MPK) and Philippines palm kernel cake (PPK)] and screen the corresponding optimal exogenous enzyme combination. In experiment 1, a 2×3 factor design was adopted, consisted of 6 groups, in which the control groups were MPK and PPK ingredients without exogenous enzymes addition, and the experimental groups were supplemented exogenous enzyme package-A (EP-A), exogenous enzyme package-B (EP-B) in PPK ingredient and supplemented EP-A, EP-B in MPK ingredient, respectively. Using SDS-Ⅱ to simulate the total tract digestive process of pigs, the IVDMD, IVCPD, IVGED and EHGE of each groups were determined. In experiment 2, a single factor completely random design adopted, consisted of 5 groups (EP0, EP1, EP2, EP3 and EP4 groups), in which the control group (EP0 group) were without exogenous enzymes addition, and the experimental groups were supplemented different combinations of exogenous enzymes in MPK ingredient. The IVDMD, IVCPD, IVGED and EHGE of each groups were determined. Five replicates per sample and one digestive tract for each replicate were set in both experiments. The results showed as follows: 1) the IVDMD, IVCPD and IVGED of PPK were significantly higher than those of MPK (P<0.05), but the EHGE of PPK had no significant difference with that of MPK (P>0.05). 2) The supplementation of exogenous enzyme combinations EP-A and EP-B significanltly increased the IVGED and EHGE of MPK and PPK (P<0.05), the supplementation of exogenous enzyme combinations EP-A and EP-B significanltly increased the IVCPD of MPK (P<0.05), and the supplementation of exogenous enzyme combination EP-B significanltly increased the IVDMD of MPK and PPK (P<0.05). 3) The supplementation of different combinations of exogenous enzymes significanltly increased the IVDMD, IVCPD, IVGED and EHGE of MPK (P<0.05), and the IVDMD, IVGED and EHGE of EP4 group were significantly higher than those of EP1, EP2 and EP3 groups (P<0.05). In conclusion, the IVDMD, IVCPD and IVGED of PPK are higher than those of MPK, which is a better source of palm kernel meal; the supplementation of exogenous enzyme combinations EP-A and EP-B can increase the IVDMD, IVCPD, IVGED and EHGE of palm kernel meal from two sources of which EP-B has better effects; the exogenous enzyme combination of EP4 group is the optimal combination for MPK enzymolysis.

Cite this article

ZHANG Shunfen , ZHONG Ruqing , ZHANG Bifeng , LI Tao , SUN Shudong , CHEN Liang , ZHANG Hongfu . Effects of Different Combinations of Exogenous Enzymes on in Vitro Nutrient Digestibility and Enzymatic Hydrolyzate Gross Energy of Palm Kernel Meal Ingredients[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020 , 32(12) : 5916 -5924 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.12.045

References

[1] 国家粮油信息中心.海关总署:2019年我国进口大豆8851万吨,进口食用植物油953万吨[R/OL].(2020-01-15)[2020-02-10].http://new.grainnews.com.cn:9999/content.aspx?id=4&type=10&articleGuid=34cb94a0-79a9-4ddc-9f8f-f5542f7fb4ea.
[2] 中国粮油信息网.农业部:中国2019/20年度大豆进口预估为8768万吨[R/OL].(2020-01-13)[2020-02-10].https://finance.sina.com.cn/money/future/fmnews/2020-01-10/doc-iihnzahk3238104.shtml.
[3] 梁怡,郭凯军,杜晋平,等.棕榈仁粕添加水平对肉牛增重性能和饲料成本的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2009,45(23):37-39.
[4] CHOE J,CHO J H,KIM J N,et al.Palm kernel expellers as an alternative ingredient in growing pig diets[J].South African Journal of Animal Science,2018,48(6):doi:10.4314/sajas.v48i6.20.
[5] CHUKWUKAELO A K,ALADI N O,OKEUDO N J,et al.Performance and meat quality characteristics of broilers fed fermented mixture of grated cassava roots and palm kernel cake as replacement for maize[J].Tropical Animal Health and Production,2018,50(3):485-493.  
[6] LIU W C,DEVI S,PARK J,et al.Effects of complex probiotic supplementation in growing pig diets with and without palm kernel expellers on growth performance,nutrient digestibility,blood parameters,fecal microbial shedding and noxious gas emission[J].Animal Science Journal,2018,89(3):552-560.  
[7] KIM J S,INGALE S L,HOSSEINDOUST A R,et al.Effects of mannan level and β-mannanase supplementation on growth performance,apparent total tract digestibility and blood metabolites of growing pigs[J].Animal an International Journal of Animal Bioscience,2017,11(2):202-208.  
[8] AO X,ZHOU T X,MENG Q W,et al.Effects of a carbohydrase cocktail supplementation on the growth performance,nutrient digestibility,blood profiles and meat quality in finishing pigs fed palm kernel meal[J].Livestock Science,2011,137(1/2/3):238-243.
[9] JAWORSKI N W,SHOULDERS J,GONZÁLEZ-VEGA J C,et al.Effects of using copra meal,palm kernel expellers,or palm kernel meal in diets for weanling pigs[J].The Professional Animal Scientist,2014,30(2):243-251.  
[10] SULABO R C,JU W S,STEIN H H.Amino acid digestibility and concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy in copra meal,palm kernel expellers,and palm kernel meal fed to growing pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science,2013,91(3):1391-1399.  
[11] ALMAGUER B L,SULABO R C,LIU Y,et al.Standardized total tract digestibility of phosphorus in copra meal,palm kernel expellers,palm kernel meal,and soybean meal fed to growing pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science,2014,92(6):2473-2480.  
[12] ZHAO F,REN L Q,MI B M,et al.Developing a computer-controlled simulated digestion system to predict the concentration of metabolizable energy of feedstuffs for rooster[J].Journal of Animal Science,2014,92(4):1537-1547.  
[13] CHEN L,GAO L X,HUANG Q H,et al.Prediction of digestible energy of feed ingredients for growing pigs using a computer-controlled simulated digestion system[J].Journal of Animal Science,2014,92(9):3887-3894.  
[14] 赵峰,张宏福,张子仪.单胃动物仿生消化系统操作手册[M].2版.北京:中国农业科学院,2011.
[15] 陈亮,张宏福.猪饲料能量消化率全消化道体外仿生评定法评述[C]//中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第十一次全国动物营养学术研讨会论文集.长沙:中国畜牧兽医学会,2012:263-269.
[16] 陈亮,张宏福,赵峰.体外透析法评定单胃动物饲料养分生物学效价[J].饲料工业,2013(19):58-61.
[17] AGUNBIADE J A,WISEMAN J,COLE D J A.Energy and nutrient use of palm kernels,palm kernel meal and palm kernel oil in diets for growing pigs[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1999,80(3/4):165-181.
[18] EZIESHI E V,OLOMU J M.Nutritional evaluation of palm kernel meal types:1.Proximate composition and metabolizable energy values[J].African Journal of Biotechnology,2007,6(21):2484-2486.  
[19] 姜竹茂,刘晓,张书文,等.热处理对生鲜乳及复原乳蛋白质体外消化特性的影响[J].食品科学,2018,39(8):33-38.
[20] 兰云贤,陈代文,林鹏.美拉德反应对养分消化代谢影响的研究现状[J].饲料工业,2005,26(9):12-16.
[21] 彭健,SLOMINSKI B A,GUENTER W,等.两步酶解-透析方法离体测定双低菜粕蛋白质消化率[J].华中农业大学学报,2000,19(4):370-372.
[22] GONZÁLEZ-VEGA J C,KIM B G,HTOO J K,et al.热处理豆粕饲喂生长猪的氨基酸消化率[J].中国饲料,2015(24):32-37.
[23] 赵谋明,刘雷,赵亚琦,等.美拉德反应对花生分离蛋白体外消化特性的影响[J].四川大学学报(自然科学版),2017,54(5):1101-1106.
[24] LE GALL M,WARPECHOWSKI M,JAGUELIN-PEYRAUD Y,et al.Influence of dietary fibre level and pelleting on the digestibility of energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows[J].Animal,2009,3(3):352-359.  
[25] SLOMINSKI B A,彭健,CAMPBELL L D,等.中国双低油菜饼粕质特性的化学评价(英文)[J].华中农业大学学报,1999,18(6):567-570.
[26] CHEN L,GAO L X,HUANG Q H,et al.Viscous and fermentable nonstarch polysaccharides affect intestinal nutrient and energy flow and hindgut fermentation in growing pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science,2017,95(11):5054-5063.  
[27] 高理想.猪饲粮非淀粉多糖酶谱仿生优化方法的研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2016.
[28] GAO L X,CHEN L,HUANG Q H,et al.Effect of dietary fiber type on intestinal nutrient digestibility and hindgut fermentation of diets fed to finishing pigs[J].Livestock Science,2015,174:53-58.
[29] 陈亮.猪常用饲料能量和粗蛋白质消化率仿生评定方法的研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2013.
[30] 易文根.棕榈粕的营养价值及其在蛋鸭饲粮中的应用研究[D].硕士学位论文.厦门:集美大学,2017.
[31] ADEOLA O,COWIESON A J.Board-invited review:opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve nonruminant animal production[J].Journal of Animal Science,2011,89(10):3189-3218.  
[32] PARK S,LEE J J,YANG B M,et al.Dietary protease improves growth performance,nutrient digestibility,and intestinal morphology of weaned pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science and Technology,2020,62(1):21-30.  
[33] 李玉鹏,刘醒醒,唐德富,等.酶解棕榈仁粕肉仔鸡氨基酸营养价值的评定[J].中国饲料,2017(2):29-34,39.
[34] 郭全奎,王璐菊.三种处理棕榈仁粕对肉仔鸡代谢能的影响[J].国外畜牧学(猪与禽),2014(12):52-53.
[35] 陈权军,邓岳松,罗永发,等.棕榈仁粕日粮添加甘露聚糖酶对蛋鸡的影响[J].饲料研究,2010(2):9-10.
[36] JIMOH A.Effects of enzyme cocktails on in vitro digestibility of palm kernel cake[J].Journal of Central European Agriculture,2018,19(1):114-125.  
[37] AKINTUNDE A,OMOLE C,SOKUNBI O A,et al.Response of growing pigs to diet physical form and allzyme SSF supplementation in a palm kernel meal-based diet[J].Animal Production,2011,13(2):56-65.
[38] ZIJLSTRA R T,OWUSU-ASIEDU A,SIMMINS P H.Future of NSP-degrading enzymes to improve nutrient utilization of co-products and gut health in pigs[J].Livestock Science,2010,134(1/2/3):255-257.
[39] 张立兰,陈亮,钟儒清,等.外源蛋白酶对肉鸡饲粮体外干物质消化率和酶水解物能值的影响[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(7):1326-1333.
Outlines

/