Determination of Available Energy and Nutrient Apparent Total Tract Digestibility of Different Fibrous Ingredients in Growing Pigs

ZHAO Jinbiao; SONG Xiaoming; LI Zhongchao; ZANG Jianjun; NI Shouqing; LIU Ling

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2021.11.013

2021 , Vol. 33 >Issue 11: 6114 - 6122

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2021.11.013

SWINE NUTRITION AND FEED

Determination of Available Energy and Nutrient Apparent Total Tract Digestibility of Different Fibrous Ingredients in Growing Pigs

ZHAO Jinbiao ,
SONG Xiaoming ,
LI Zhongchao ,
ZANG Jianjun ,
NI Shouqing ,
LIU Ling

Expand

1. National Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Beijing Tonglixingke Agricultural Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100193, China;
3. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China

Received date: 2021-03-16

Online published: 2021-11-10

Supported by

Fold

Abstract

The objective of this study was conducted to determine the digestible energy, metabolizable energy and nutrient apparent total tract digestibility of different fibrous ingredients in growing pigs. Thirty healthy "Duroc×Landrace×Large White" crossed pigs with average initial body weight of (45.0±2.1) kg were randomly divided into 5 groups with 6 replicates per group and 1 pig per replicate. Pigs in 5 groups were fed a corn basal diet which contained 97.4% corn and 4 fibrous diets which contained 29.22% soybean hull, soybean residue, apple pomace and fermented apple pomace, respectively. The experiment lasted for 22 days, including 7 days of cages adaptation period, 10 days of diets adaptation period and 5 days of total urine and feces collection period. The results showed as follows:1) compared with the corn basal diet, the apparent total tract digestibility of gross energy, crude protein and ether extract and metabolizable energy/gross energy of growing pigs fed with soybean hull, soybean residue, apple pomace and fermented apple pomace diets were significantly decreased (P<0.05), while the apparent total tract digestibility of total dietary fiber, insoluble dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber was significantly increased (P<0.05). Compared with the soybean hull and soybean residue diets, the apparent total tract digestibility of gross energy, crude protein and acid detergent fiber of growing pigs fed with apple pomace and fermented apple pomace diets was significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the digestible energy/gross energy and metabolizable energy/gross energy of growing pigs fed with fermented apple pomace diet were significantly decreased (P<0.05). 2) The apparent total tract digestibility of acid detergent fiber, insoluble dietary fiber and gross energy of soybean residue was significantly higher than that of apple pomace and fermented apple pomace (P<0.05). The digestible energy and metabolizable energy of soybean hull were significantly higher than those of soybean residue, apple pomace and fermented apple pomace (P<0.05). The digestible energy/gross energy and metabolizable energy/gross energy of soybean hull and soybean residue were significantly higher than those of apple pomace and fermented apple pomace (P<0.05), while the metabolizable energy/digestible energy was significantly lower than that of apple pomace and fermented apple pomace (P<0.05). In conclusion, different fibrous ingredients have large differences in digestible energy, metabolizable energy and nutrient apparent total tract digestibility of growing pigs, and the feeding value in growing pigs of soybean hull and soybean residue are better than apple pomace and fermented apple pomace.

Key words： fibrous ingredients; growing pigs; digestible energy; metabolizable energy; digestibility

Cite this article

ZHAO Jinbiao , SONG Xiaoming , LI Zhongchao , ZANG Jianjun , NI Shouqing , LIU Ling . Determination of Available Energy and Nutrient Apparent Total Tract Digestibility of Different Fibrous Ingredients in Growing Pigs[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021 , 33(11) : 6114 -6122 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2021.11.013

References

[1] KONG C, ADEOLA O.Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2014, 27(7):917-925.

[2] KOH A, DE VADDER F, KOVATCHEVA-DATCHARY P, et al.From dietary fiber to host physiology:short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites[J].Cell, 2016, 165(6):1332-1345.

[3] FLINT H J, SCOTT K P, LOUIS P, et al.The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health[J].Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2012, 9:577-589.
[4] GAO Z G, YIN J, ZHANG J, et al.Butyrate improves insulin sensitivity and increases energy expenditure in mice[J].Diabetes, 2009, 58:1509-1517.
[5] LIU H, WANG J, HE T, et al.Butyrate:a double-edged sword for health?[J].Advances in Nutrition, 2018, 9(1):21-29.

[6] GENSOLLEN T, IYER S S, KASPER D L, et al.How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system[J].Science, 2016, 352(6285):539-544.

[7] NATIVIDAD J M M, VERDU E F.Modulation of intestinal barrier by intestinal microbiota:pathological and therapeutic implications[J].Pharmacological Research, 2013, 69:42-51.
[8] BÄUMLER A J, SPERANDIO V.Interactions between the microbiota and pathogenic bacteria in the gut[J].Nature, 2016, 535(7610):85-93.

[9] ZHAO J, SHI C, LI Z, et al.Effects of supplementary amino acids on available energy of soybean meal determined by difference and regression methods fed to growing pigs[J].Animal Science Journal, 2018, 89(2):404-411.

[10] MUDGIL D, BARAK S.Composition, properties and health benefits of indigestible carbohydrate polymers as dietary fiber:a review[J].International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2013, 61:1-6.
[11] PIEPER R, JHA R, ROSSNAGEL B, et al.Effect of barley and oat cultivars with different carbohydrate compositions on the intestinal bacterial communities in weaned piglets[J].FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2008, 66(3):556-566.

[12] NRC.Nutrient requirements of swine[M].11th ed.Washington, D.C.:National Academy Press, 2012.
[13] ADEOLA O.Digestion and balance techniques in pigs[M]//LEWIS A J, SOUTHERM L L.Swine nutrition.2nd ed.New York:CRC press, 2001:903-916.
[14] HORWITZ W, LATIMER G W.Official methods of analysis of AOAC International[M].18th ed.Gaithersburg:AOAC International, 2006.
[15] VAN SOEST P J, ROBERTSON J B, LEWIS B A.Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74(10):3583-3597.

[16] WILLIAMS B A, VERSTEGEN M W, TAMMINGA S.Fermentation in the large intestine of single-stomached animals and its relationship to animal health[J].Nutrition Research Reviews, 2001, 14(2):207-228.

[17] JHA R, BERROCOSO J D.Review:dietary fiber utilization and its effects on physiological functions and gut health of swine[J].Animal, 2015, 9(9):1441-1452.

[18] ZHAO J B, BAI Y, TAO S Y, et al.Fiber-rich foods affected gut bacterial community and short-chain fatty acids production in pig model[J].Journal of Functional Foods, 2009, 57:266-274.
[19] ZHANG W J, LI D F, LIU L, et al.The effects of dietary fiber level on nutrient digestibility in growing pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2013, 4(1):17.
[20] JAWORSKI N W, STEIN H H.Disappearance of nutrients and energy in the stomach and small intestine, cecum, and colon of pigs fed corn-soybean meal diets containing distillers dried grains with solubles, wheat middlings, or soybean hulls[J].Journal of Animal Science, 2017, 95:727-739.
[21] NAVARRO D M D L, BRUININX E M A M, DE JONG L, et al.Effects of physicochemical characteristics of feed ingredients on the apparent total tract digestibility of energy, DM, and nutrients by growing pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science, 2018, 96(6):2265-2277.

[22] WILFART A, MONTAGNE L, SIMMINS P H, et al.Sites of nutrient digestion in growing pigs:effect of dietary fiber[J].Journal of Animal Science, 2007, 85(4):976-983.

[23] ZHAO J B, WANG Q Y, LIU L, et al.Comparative digestibility of nutrients and amino acids in high-fiber diets fed to crossbred barrows of Duroc boars crossed with Berkshire×Jiaxing and Landrace×Yorkshire[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2018, 31(5):721-728.

[24] FREIRE J P B, GUERREIRO A J G, CUNHA L F, et al.Effect of dietary fibre source on total tract digestibility, caecum volatile fatty acids and digestive transit time in the weaned Piglet[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2000, 87(1/2):71-83.
[25] ZERVAS S, ZIJLSTRA R T.Effects of dietary protein and oat hull fiber on nitrogen excretion patterns and postprandial plasma urea profiles in grower pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science, 2002.80(12):3238-3246.
[26] ZERVAS S, ZIJLSTRA R T.Effects of dietary protein and fermentable fiber on nitrogen excretion patterns and plasma urea in grower pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science, 2002, 80(12):3247-3256.

[27] PATRÁS P, NITRAYOVÁ S, BRESTENSK Ý M, et al.Effect of dietary fiber and crude protein content in feed on nitrogen retention in pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science, 2012, 90(Suppl 4):158-160.
[28] WANG T, RAGLAND D, ADEOLA O.Combination of digestibility marker and fiber affect energy and nitrogen digestibility in growing pigs[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2017, 230:23-29.
[29] GAO L X, CHEN L, HUANG Q H, et al.Effect of dietary fiber type on intestinal nutrient digestibility and hindgut fermentation of diets fed to finishing pigs[J].Livestock Science, 2015, 174:53-58.
[30] ZHOU X, ZIJLSTRA R T, BELTRANENA E.Nutrient digestibility of solvent-extracted Brassica napus and Brassica juncea canola meals and their air-classified fractions fed to ileal-cannulated grower pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science, 2015, 93(1):217-228.

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References