RESEARCH PAPER

Effects of Rumen Protected Nicotinamide on Intestinal Morphology, Barrier and Transport Function, and Volatile Fatty Acid Contents of Fattening Hu Sheep

  • ZHANG Yiwei , 1 ,
  • MA Zhicong 1 ,
  • HAN Qiang 2 ,
  • CHU Lingna 3 ,
  • LI Zhefeng 4 ,
  • FENG Changdong 1 ,
  • WU Hao 1 ,
  • WANG Chong , 1, ** ,
  • WEI Xiaoshi , 1, **
Expand
  • 1 College of Animal Science and Technology·Animal Medical College, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
  • 2 Agricultural and Rural Bureau of Changxing, Changxing 313100, China
  • 3 Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Station of Changxing, Changxing 313199, China
  • 4 Hangzhou King Techina Feed Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 311107, China
** WANG Chong, professor, E-mail: ;
WEI Xiaoshi, lecturer, E-mail:

*Contributed equally

Received date: 2023-04-13

  Online published: 2023-09-13

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to study the effects of rumen protected nicotinamide (RPN) on intestinal morphology, barrier and transport function and volatile fatty acid contents in hindgut contents of fattening Hu sheep. Sixteen healthy fattening male Hu sheep with similar age (2-month-old) and weight were selected and allocated to 2 groups: CON group (fed a basal diet only) and RPN group (adding 1 g/d RPN). The pre-test lasted for 7 days and the experiment lasted for 90 days. The results showed as follows: compared with the CON group, 1) adding 1 g/d RPN significantly increased the villus height and muscle thickness of the jejunum of Hu sheep (P<0.05); 2) adding 1 g/d RPN significantly increased the protein expression levels of Claudin-2 and Occludin in jejunal mucosa (P<0.05); 3) the relative expression levels of glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) genes in jejunum of RPN group were significantly increased (P<0.05), the relative expression levels of GLUT2, amino acid transporter 2 (SLC38A2) and solute carrier family 1 member 5 (SLC1A5) genes in ileum of RPN group were significantly increased (P<0.05), and the relative expression level of SGLT1 gene of RPN group was significantly increased (P<0.05) ; 4) supplementing 1 g/d RPN significantly increased the content of isovaleric acid (P<0.05), and tended to increase acetic acid (P=0.058) and total volatile fatty acids contents (P=0.077). In conclusion, supplementing 1 g/d RPN to the diet promotes the intestinal development, improves the intestinal barrier and expression of amino acid transporter, and promotes the post-intestinal fermentation of Hu sheep.[Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2023, 35(9):5849-5859]

Cite this article

ZHANG Yiwei , MA Zhicong , HAN Qiang , CHU Lingna , LI Zhefeng , FENG Changdong , WU Hao , WANG Chong , WEI Xiaoshi . Effects of Rumen Protected Nicotinamide on Intestinal Morphology, Barrier and Transport Function, and Volatile Fatty Acid Contents of Fattening Hu Sheep[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2023 , 35(9) : 5849 -5859 . DOI: 10.12418/CJAN2023.538

湖羊是我国一级保护地方畜禽品种[1],今广泛存在太湖流域及临近地区[2-3],具有发育快、性早熟、四季发情、多胎且耐高温高湿等优良性状[4-5]。湖羊产业链对我国羊肉、羊毛、羔皮等贡献巨大[6]。内蒙古、新疆、甘肃、贵州等省区实施退耕还草工程时需引进优良品种,湖羊成为首选品种之一,浙江湖州的供种量约10万头以上,可占到整省供给的65%[7-8]。湖羊是浙江优势地方品种,省内以湖州居多,在2015年农业部批准对“湖州湖羊”实施国家农产品地理标志登记保护。
肠道是反刍动物重要的消化器官,大量的过瘤胃营养物质在后肠道消化吸收[9],小肠营养素转运载体的表达可影响过瘤胃营养物质在肠道的转运,从而影响机体的生长发育和新陈代谢[10-12]。此外,肠道上皮是机体抵御外源性病原体的重要屏障[13-14]。因此,肠道的健康及其组织结构的完整性,对于反刍动物的生产性能、营养物质消化吸收与屏障抵御功能有重要作用[15]
烟酰胺(nicotinamide, NAM)是维生素B3的衍生物[16-17],作为辅酶Ⅰ与辅酶Ⅱ的前体物质参与脂代谢、糖代谢以及蛋白质代谢[18-21]。研究表明,NAM能改善肉鸡空肠黏膜形态结构,促进消化吸收,并改善小肠的黏膜形态结构[22]。此外,补饲NAM可促进羔羊小肠形态发育,提高空肠葡萄糖转运载体葡萄糖转运蛋白2(GLUT2)、钠-葡萄糖共同转运体1(SGLT1)和回肠GLUT2的基因相对表达量[23]。前期研究中发现,补饲过瘤胃烟酰胺(rumen protected NAM,RPN)能够显著增加育肥湖羊平均日增重及心脏、肝脏和脾脏重量,显著提高肝脏指数以及胴体重,并且显著降低育肥湖羊背最长肌的黄度值,改善其屠宰性能[24]。本试验在前期研究的基础上,探究RPN对育肥湖羊肠道结构形态、屏障功能、转运载体表达以及后肠道内容物挥发性脂肪酸(volatile fatty acid, VFA)含量的影响,旨在为NAM在湖羊生产中的应用提供新的思路。

1 材料与方法

1.1 试验设计及饲养管理

选取16只体况良好、体重[(20.45±1.18) kg]相近的健康育肥公湖羊,随机分为2组,分别为对照组(饲喂基础饲粮)和试验组(额外添加1 g/d RPN),每组8只。RPN由杭州某饲料有限公司提供(NAM含量为60%,过瘤胃率为83.6%)。RPN于每日08:00晨饲前撒在一小部分基础饲粮上,用手诱导湖羊采食,保证湖羊采食完全后再饲喂基础饲粮。基础饲粮每日饲喂2次(08:00和14:00),湖羊自由进食和饮水。预试期7 d,正试期90 d。基础饲粮为商品化育肥期饲粮(营养成分等详见朱锦鹏等[24]发表的文章)。

1.2 样品采集及指标测定

试验结束后,屠宰所有湖羊采集样品。屠宰前湖羊禁食12 h,自由饮水。分离湖羊的十二指肠、空肠、回肠和盲肠,用于后续测定。剪取回肠和盲肠的中段肠管,取其内容物放于冻存管,迅速置于液氮中,后转入-80 ℃冰箱保存,用于空肠和盲肠内容物的VFA含量分析。

1.2.1 肠道组织形态的观察

石蜡切片的制作及苏木精-伊红(HE)染色参考Zhang等[25]的方法,经过组织梯度酒精脱水、透明、浸蜡、包埋等一系列步骤制作空肠与回肠组织石蜡切片,最后进行HE染色。使用正倒置一体荧光显微镜观察肠道形态结构,对绒毛高度、隐窝深度与肌层厚度进行测定,计算绒毛高度与隐窝深度的比值(绒隐比)。

1.2.2 紧密连接蛋白表达测定

取空肠和回肠组织样,使用细胞组织快速裂解液(RIPA)提取总蛋白,并测定蛋白浓度(BCA法,Protein Assay Kit, Thermo)。按照雅酶凝胶快速制备试剂盒进行制胶,分离蛋白样品,转膜(聚偏二氟乙烯膜),封闭,孵育一抗二抗,曝光显色,并采用Image J计算各组灰度值,用于数据分析。

1.2.3 肠道葡萄糖、氨基酸转运载体表达测定

使用TaKaRa RNAios Plus(Total RNA提取试剂)试剂盒提取各肠段组织的总RNA,测定RNA浓度和质量后反转录合成cDNA(PrimeScriptTM RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser,TaKaRa)。葡萄糖、氨基酸转运载体相关基因的特异性引物序列见表1。使用TB Green Premix Ex Taq(TaKaRa)试剂盒检测相关基因相对表达量,反应体系为10 μL。
表1 葡萄糖、氨基酸转运载体相关基因的引物序列

Table 1 Primer sequence for genes related to glucose and amino acid transporters

基因
Genes
上游引物
Forward primer (5'—3')
下游引物
Reverse primer (5'—3')
葡萄糖转运蛋白2 GLUT2 TGTTTCACTGGATGACGGAAT AGCCCAAGAGACTGGTGTTG
葡萄糖转运蛋白5 GLUT5 CGATGTCCAGTATGTGACGGCA GCAGCAGGCAGTGAAACAGACA
钠-葡萄糖共同转运体1 SGLT1 AGCCTTCCTTCCTGGGCATGGA GGACAGCACCGTGTTGGCGTAGA
氨基酸转运蛋白2 SLC38A2 TTCATTTGTCTGCCATCC TCAGGTATCCAAAGAGGG
溶质载体家族3成员2 SLC3A2 AGAACATCACTAAGAGCGTCAG AACAGGTCCTTGGTGGGT
溶质载体家族6成员19 SLC6A19 TCGGTCATCGTGTCTGTGAT GGAAGCAGTCGTCGTAGCG
溶质载体家族1成员5 SLC1A5 GGGGCGAGGTTGAGGGTAT TGAAGGAGTTGAAGAAGCGAAT
β-肌动蛋白 β-actin AGCCTTCCTTCCTGGGCATGGA GGACAGCACCGTGTTGGCGTAGA

1.2.4 肠道VFA含量的测定

肠道内容物VFA含量的测定参考Kristensen等[26]的方法,正磷酸酸化后的空肠、盲肠内容物样品于冰上解冻,在4 ℃、13 000×g条件下离心10 min,吸取上清液经0.22 μm水系滤膜过滤后注入气相色谱进样瓶,于气相色谱仪(Agilent7890BGC)上机分析。

1.3 数据处理及统计分析

使用Excel 2019软件进行数据初步整理,应用SPSS 25.0统计软件进行独立样本t检验,Graphpad prism进行图片绘制。结果用平均值和均值标准误(SEM)表示,P<0.05为差异显著,0.05≤P<0.10为差异有显著的趋势。

2 结果与分析

2.1 RPN对湖羊肠道组织形态的影响

湖羊空肠及回肠的HE染色切片如图1所示,所有试验组湖羊肠道结构与形态完整。由表2可知,与CON组相比,RPN组湖羊空肠绒毛高度和肌层厚度显著提高(P<0.05),隐窝深度与绒隐比均无显著差异(P>0.05)。由表3可知,与CON组相比,RPN组湖羊回肠绒毛高度、隐窝深度、绒隐比及肌层厚度均无显著差异(P>0.05)。
图1 RPN对湖羊空肠、回肠形态结构的影响

图中A和B分别为空肠和回肠,1、2、3分别为肠绒毛、隐窝和肌层。

Fig.1 Effects of RPN on morphological structure of jejunum and ileum of Hu sheep (50×)

In the picture, A and B are jejunum and ileum, respectively, 1, 2 and 3 are intestinal villi, crypt and muscular layer, respectively.

表2 RPN对湖羊空肠形态的影响

Table 2 Effects of RPN on jejunum morphology of Hu sheep

项目
Items
组别 Groups SEM P
P-value
CON RPN
绒毛高度 VH/μm 669.63 791.11 30.55 0.043
隐窝深度 CD/μm 588.53 558.42 23.87 0.550
绒隐比 VH/CD 1.23 1.46 0.08 0.183
肌层厚度 MT/μm 124.42 160.62 8.42 0.023
表3 RPN对湖羊回肠形态的影响

Table 3 Effects of RPN on ileum morphology of Hu sheep

项目
Items
组别 Groups SEM P
P-value
CON RPN
绒毛高度 VH/μm 626.53 667.40 33.44 0.562
隐窝深度 CD/μm 399.85 406.59 33.82 0.926
绒隐比 VH/CD 1.64 1.83 0.08 0.280
肌层厚度 MT/μm 156.58 150.33 9.27 0.748

2.2 RPN对湖羊空肠、回肠黏膜紧密连接蛋白表达的影响

图2-A所示,与CON组相比,RPN组空肠黏膜中封闭蛋白-2(Claudin-2)与闭合蛋白(Occludin)的蛋白表达水平显著增加(P<0.05);如图2-B所示,RPN组回肠黏膜中Claudin-2与Occludin的蛋白表达水平与CON组相比无显著差异(P>0.05)。
图2 RPN对湖羊空肠、回肠黏膜紧密连接蛋白表达的影响

Claudin-2:闭合蛋白-2;Occludin:闭锁蛋白;β-actin:β-肌动蛋白。

*表示差异显著(P<0.05)。

Fig.2 Effects of RPN on protein expression of tight junction in jejunum and ileum mucosa of Hu sheep

The * indicates significant difference (P<0.05).

2.3 RPN对湖羊十二指肠、空肠和回肠葡萄糖、氨基酸转运载体基因表达的影响

表4可知,与CON组相比,RPN组十二指肠的氨基酸转运蛋白2(SLC38A2)基因相对表达量具有增加趋势(P=0.094),溶质载体家族6成员19(SLC6A19)(P=0.053)、溶质载体家族3成员2(SLC3A2)(P=0.066)的基因相对表达量均具有降低趋势。
表4 RPN对湖羊十二指肠葡萄糖、氨基酸转运载体基因表达的影响

Table 4 Effects of RPN on gene expression of glucose and amino acid transporters in duodenum of Hu sheep

项目
Items
组别 Groups SEM P
P-value
CON RPN
葡萄糖转运蛋白2 GLUT2 1.00 1.13 0.306 0.674
葡萄糖转运蛋白5 GLUT5 1.00 1.65 0.566 0.321
钠-葡萄糖共同转运体1 SGLT1 1.00 1.05 0.405 0.899
氨基酸转运蛋白2 SLC38A2 1.00 1.85 0.417 0.094
溶质载体家族3成员2 SLC3A2 1.00 0.65 0.168 0.066
溶质载体家族6成员19 SLC6A19 1.00 0.44 0.251 0.053
溶质载体家族1成员5 SLC1A5 1.00 0.67 0.202 0.136
表5可知,与CON组相比,RPN组空肠GLUT2和钠-葡萄糖共同转运体1(SGLT1)基因相对表达量显著升高(P<0.05)。
表5 RPN对湖羊空肠葡萄糖、氨基酸转运载体基因表达的影响

Table 5 Effects of RPN on gene expression of glucose and amino acid transporters in jejunum of Hu sheep

项目
Items
组别 Groups SEM P
P-value
CON RPN
葡萄糖转运蛋白2 GLUT2 1.00 2.18 0.413 0.019
葡萄糖转运蛋白5 GLUT5 1.00 0.95 0.236 0.852
钠-葡萄糖共同转运体1 SGLT1 1.00 1.86 0.391 0.055
氨基酸转运蛋白2 SLC38A2 1.00 0.88 0.220 0.611
溶质载体家族3成员2 SLC3A2 1.00 1.31 0.223 0.200
溶质载体家族6成员19 SLC6A19 1.00 1.03 0.324 0.927
溶质载体家族1成员5 SLC1A5 1.00 0.79 0.143 0.180
表6可知,与CON组相比,RPN组回肠GLUT2、SLC38A2、溶质载体家族1成员5(SLC1A5)的基因相对表达量显著升高(P<0.05),SGLT1的基因相对表达量显著升高(P<0.05)。
表6 RPN对湖羊回肠葡萄糖、氨基酸转运载体基因表达的影响

Table 6 Effects of RPN on gene expression of glucose and amino acids transporters in ileum of Hu sheep

项目
Items
组别 Groups SEM P
P-value
CON RPN
葡萄糖转运蛋白2 GLUT2 1.00 8.89 1.550 0.001
钠-葡萄糖共同转运体1 SGLT1 1.00 2.49 0.552 0.048
氨基酸转运蛋白2 SLC38A2 1.00 1.92 0.200 0.001
溶质载体家族3成员2 SLC3A2 1.00 1.15 0.157 0.367
溶质载体家族6成员19 SLC6A19 1.00 1.51 0.409 0.243
溶质载体家族1成员5 SLC1A5 1.00 10.10 2.049 0.002

2.4 RPN对湖羊空肠和盲肠VFA含量的影响

表7可知,RPN组空肠的异戊酸和异位酸含量显著高于对照组(P<0.05),乙酸(P=0.058)和总挥发性脂肪酸含量(P=0.077)均具有增加的趋势。
表7 RPN对湖羊空肠挥发性脂肪酸含量的影响

Table 7 Effects of RPN on contents of volatile fatty acids in jejunum of Hu sheep

项目
Items
组别 Groups SEM P
P-value
CON RPN
乙酸 Acetate/(mmol/L) 1.59 2.26 0.320 0.058
丙酸 Propionate/(mmol/L) 0.30 0.39 0.086 0.296
丁酸 Butyrate/(mmol/L) 0.18 0.23 0.033 0.128
异丁酸 Isobutyrate/(mmol/L) 0.17 0.18 0.002 0.109
戊酸 Valerate/(mmol/L) 0.16 0.17 0.005 0.113
异戊酸 Isovalerate/(mmol/L) 0.17 0.27 0.032 0.023
异位酸 Isoacids/(mmol/L) 0.51 0.61 0.032 0.017
乙酸/丙酸 A/P 5.38 6.49 0.888 0.260
总挥发性脂肪酸 TVFA/(mmol/L) 2.58 3.50 0.440 0.077
表8可知,与CON组相比,RPN组盲肠的各VFA含量、乙酸/丙酸和总挥发性脂肪酸含量均无显著差异(P>0.05)。
表8 RPN对湖羊盲肠挥发性脂肪酸含量的影响

Table 8 Effects of RPN on contents of volatile fatty acids in cecum of Hu sheep

项目
Items
组别 Groups SEM P
P-value
CON RPN
乙酸 Acetate/(mmol/L) 41.83 42.32 3.566 0.892
丙酸 Propionate/(mmol/L) 12.60 13.14 1.326 0.692
丁酸 Butyrate/(mmol/L) 4.63 5.29 0.716 0.374
异丁酸 Isobutyrate/(mmol/L) 1.11 1.15 0.122 0.724
戊酸 Valerate/(mmol/L) 1.31 1.51 0.147 0.185
异戊酸 Isovalerate/(mmol/L) 0.69 0.76 0.103 0.532
异位酸 Isoacids/(mmol/L) 3.11 3.35 0.372 0.538
乙酸/丙酸 A/P 3.23 3.25 0.182 0.934
总挥发性脂肪酸 TVFA/(mmol/L) 62.17 64.10 5.597 0.736

3 讨论

3.1 RPN对湖羊肠道组织形态的影响

肠道良好的结构形态是动物机体对营养物质消化和吸收的重要保证[27],尤其是小肠的绒毛和隐窝结构,它们是判别反刍动物机体对营养物质消化和吸收的重要标准[28];除此之外,小肠的吸收功能会被小肠的收缩运动所影响,并且其肌层厚度一发生变化就会直接影响到小肠的收缩运动[29]。本试验在育肥湖羊饲粮中添加RPN能显著提高空肠的绒毛高度与肌层厚度。研究显示,NAM能提高仔鼠十二指肠和空肠的绒隐比[30]。在肉鸡饲粮中补饲60、90 mg/kg NAM增加了肉鸡空肠绒毛高度[22]。赵会会[23]的研究表明,在围产后期奶山羊饲粮中添加5 g/d NAM提高了羔羊十二指肠和空肠的绒毛高度。这些结果表明,饲粮中添加RPN可改善湖羊肠道形态和促进肠道发育。
肠道黏膜屏障的完整性能够抵抗肠道有害病菌的入侵[31],而紧密连接蛋白是构成肠屏障的重要蛋白分子,与肠道通透性息息相关[32]。其中,最主要的紧密连接蛋白是Occludin家族和Claudin家族等[33]。NAM是烟酸(nicotinic acid,NA)的酰胺形式。断奶仔猪补饲NA可以增加小肠OccludinClaudin-1的基因相对表达量[34]。动物补饲NA可通过介导沉默调节蛋白1(SIRT1)、腺苷酸活化蛋白激酶(AMPK)等能量代谢信号通路提高肠道上皮细胞紧密连接蛋白的表达,从而促进肠道黏膜屏障功能损伤修复[35]。SIRT1是NAD+依赖性蛋白脱乙酰酶,其活性可影响APMK的激活[36],也可抑制促炎症因子的表达[37],随着NAD+的浓度提高,肠道干细胞SIRT1的活性增加,使肠道上皮细胞促炎症因子的表达下降,SIRT1迅速活化激活细胞核内的AMPK,促进肠道干细胞的增殖,提高肠道上皮细胞紧密连接蛋白的表达[38-39]。本试验中,添加RPN后能使空肠黏膜中Claudin-2与Occludin的蛋白表达水平显著增加,表明RPN在维持肠道屏障紧密连接功能方面起着重要作用,我们推测添加RPN可能通过增加体内NAD+浓度改善肠道屏障,有待进一步明确。

3.2 RPN对湖羊肠道转运载体表达的影响

RPN可以改善肠道形态,提高肠道紧密连接蛋白的表达量,推测可能会影响肠道对营养物质的吸收。因此,本试验中检测了十二指肠、空肠、回肠的葡萄糖转运载体与氨基酸转运载体的表达。转运载体的相对表达量是衡量小肠吸收能力的重要指标[40],进入小肠的蛋白质、脂肪以及碳水化合物会被消化酶降解为游离的氨基酸、果糖和葡萄糖等[41],然后通过相应的肠道转运载体的转运被小肠上皮细胞吸收,继而进入血液循环以供机体生长发育及代谢使用[12]。前期研究显示,添加NAM能提高羔羊空肠葡萄糖转运载体GLUT5、SGLT1与回肠GLUT2的基因相对表达量,与本试验结果相似,但对氨基酸转运载体表达无显著影响[23]。课题组前期研究发现,NAM可能影响氨基酸代谢[42],本试验中提高的氨基酸转运载体表达一定程度支持了氨基酸代谢改变的结果。在机体内,NAD+和NADP+可作为辅酶参与糖酵解、三羧酸循环、磷酸戊糖途径,外源补充NAM可提高体内NAD+的浓度,进而参与机体糖代谢[43-44]。本试验结果显示,RPN提高肠道葡萄糖、氨基酸转运载体的表达,表明RPN可能促进育肥湖羊对葡萄糖、氨基酸等的吸收。

3.3 RPN对湖羊肠道VFA含量的影响

肠道内容物中的VFA是肠道微生物对碳水化合物的降解产物[45],能够调节肠道pH,抑制有害病菌的增殖[46],保护肠道黏膜屏障[47],还能够为动物机体和肠道细胞提供能源[48]。目前RPN对肠道VFA影响的研究较少,大多是NA对瘤胃VFA含量影响的研究。在水牛的精料混合物中添加NAM和NA,能提高胃肠道的总VFA浓度和VFA中丙酸比例[49]。杨艳等[50]研究发现,适量添加NA能够使瘤胃中总VFA、丙酸含量增加,降低乙酸/丙酸。本试验中,添加RPN能够提高VFA含量以及乙酸/丙酸,推测丙酸可能在瘤胃被吸收,导致肠道中乙酸/丙酸升高。空肠和盲肠的VFA含量变化不同可能与肠道内微生物种类、NAM水平以及肠道pH有关。上述结果表明,RPN能够提高湖羊肠道VFA的含量。添加NA发现乙酸含量与瘤胃原生动物数量呈负相关[51]。有研究表明,添加NA能够影响肠内菌的数量,可能改善肠道发酵[52-53]。所以,本试验推测RPN可能促进肠道微生物的生长与增殖,提高微生物蛋白产量[54],以维持肠道内VFA之间的比例;此外,RPN也有可能通过影响NAD+和NADP+浓度影响肠道发酵环境[55]

4 结论

综上所述,育肥湖羊补饲1 g/d RPN可改善其肠道形态,促进肠道屏障紧密连接和后肠道发酵;此外,还能够提高湖羊肠道葡萄糖、氨基酸转运载体的表达,可能促进肠道对葡萄糖等的吸收。
[1]
施光源. 生态环境与湖羊形成关系的探讨[J]. 家畜生态, 1990(3):42-44.

SHI G Y. Discussion on the relationship between ecological environment and the formation of Hu sheep[J]. Journal of Domestic Animal Ecology, 1990(3):42-44. (in Chinese)

[2]
李群. 湖羊的来源及历史再探[J]. 中国农史, 1997(2):90-94.

LI Q. Revisiting the origin and history of Hu sheep[J]. Agricultural History of China, 1997(2):90-94. (in Chinese)

[3]
耿荣庆, 常洪, 杨章平, 等. 湖羊起源及系统地位的研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 30(3):21-24,28.

GENG R Q, CHANG H, YANG Z P, et al. Study on origin and phylogeny status of Hu sheep[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2002, 30(3):21-24,28. (in Chinese)

[4]
陈建正. 湖羊品种特性及舍饲关键技术[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2022, 25(12):82-84.

CHEN J Z. Variety characteristics and key techniques of barn feeding of Hu sheep[J]. Special Economic Animal and Plant, 2022, 25(12):82-84. (in Chinese)

[5]
魏学盛, 胡江, 张乃锋. 湖羊蛋白质营养及需要量研究进展[J/OL]. 饲料工业:1-10[2023-03-20]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/21.1169.S.20230226.2230.002.html.

WEI X S, HU J, ZHANG N F. Research progress on protein nutrition and requirement of Hu sheep[J/OL]. Feed Industry:1-10[2023-03-20]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/21.1169.S.20230226.2230.002.html. (in Chinese)

[6]
张艳丽, 郭佳禾, 姚晓磊, 等. 湖羊繁殖性状的调控机制研究进展[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2022, 45(5):1032-1040.

ZHANG Y L, GUO J H, YAO X L, et al. Research progress on regulation mechanism of reproductive traits of Hu sheep[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2022, 45(5):1032-1040. (in Chinese)

[7]
毛华敏. 浙江特色畜牧业的“三有”发展之路[N]. 中国畜牧兽医报, 2021-12-19(004).

MAO H M. The ‘three haves’ development road of Zhejiang characteristic animal husbandry[N]. Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinary News, 2021-12-19(004). (in Chinese)

[8]
屠炳江, 陈金丽. 规模化湖羊场建设规划与羊舍设计[J]. 浙江畜牧兽医, 2021, 46(6):29-30.

TU B J, CHEN J L. Large-scale Hu sheep farm construction planning and sheep house design[J]. Zhejiang Journal Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2021, 46(6):29-30. (in Chinese)

[9]
万发春, 宋阳, 兰欣怡, 等. 反刍动物全消化道营养调控理论探讨[J/OL]. 动物营养学报:1-8[2023-03-20]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5461.S.20230131.0900.003.html.

WAN F C, SONG Y, LAN X Y, et al. Nutrition regulation theory of total digestive tract in ruminants[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition:1-8[2023-03-20]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5461.S.20230131.0900.003.html. (in Chinese)

[10]
黄六容, 李云亮, 何荣海, 等. 碳水化合物对动物肠道健康调控作用的研究进展[J/OL]. 饲料工业:1-14[2023-03-20]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/21.1169.S.20230301.1008.004.html.

HUANG L R, LI Y L, HE R H, et al. Research progress on the regulation of carbohydrates on animal intestinal health[J/OL]. Feed Industry:1-14[2023-03-20]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/21.1169.S.20230301.1008.004.html. (in Chinese)

[11]
张爱华. 肉仔鸡肠道主要营养素转运载体mRNA表达发育规律的研究[D].硕士学位论文. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2014.

ZHANG A H. Ontogenetic regulation of nutrient transporters in the small intestine of broilers[D].Master’s Thesis. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2014. (in Chinese)

[12]
SPEIER J S, YADGARY L, UNI Z, et al. Gene expression of nutrient transporters and digestive enzymes in the yolk sac membrane and small intestine of the developing embryonic chick[J]. Poultry Science, 2012, 91(8):1941-1949.

DOI PMID

[13]
方懿, 邓谭杰, 吴小妹, 等. 芳香烃受体对肠道屏障的调控作用研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2023, 59(3):40-45.

FANG Y, DENG T J, WU X M, et al. Research progress on the regulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptors on intestinal barrier[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2023, 59(3):40-45. (in Chinese)

[14]
DONG S Q, SINGH T P, WEI X, et al. Protective effect of 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 on pepsin-trypsin-resistant gliadin-induced tight junction injuries[J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2018, 63(1):92-104.

DOI

[15]
龚福来, 林雪, 王红权. 丁酸对肠道健康的影响及作用机制的研究进展[J]. 饲料研究, 2020, 43(3):113-117.

GONG F L, LIN X, WANG H Q. Review on the effect of butyrate on intestinal health and the action mechanism[J]. Feed Research, 2020, 43(3):113-117. (in Chinese)

[16]
潘瑞珍, 林燕, 郭庆, 等. 烟酰胺对番鸭组织中矿物元素含量的影响[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 31(3):370-372.

PAN R Z, LIN Y, GUO Q, et al. Effect of dietary nicotinamide level on mineral element contents of tissue in muscovy ducks[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(Natural Science Edition), 2002, 31(3):370-372. (in Chinese)

[17]
佚名. 烟酰胺[N]. 中国畜牧兽医报, 2008-12-14(010).

Anon. Nicotinamide[N]. Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinary News, 2008-12-14(010). (in Chinese)

[18]
佚名. 烟酸烟酰胺的概念[J]. 当代畜牧, 2013, 17:22.

Anon. The concept of nicotinic nicotinamide[J]. Contemporary Animal Husbandry, 2013, 17:22. (in Chinese)

[19]
韩永利, 李秋凤, 李建国. 烟酸对奶牛的营养作用[J]. 饲料博览, 2002(3):33-34.

HAN Y L, LI Q F, LI J G. Nutritive effect of vitamin Ni for dairy[J]. Feed Review, 2002(3):33-34. (in Chinese)

[20]
孙先枝, 郑楠, 卜登攀, 等. 烟酰胺对热应激奶牛血液中激素、抗氧化能力及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2014, 19(5):101-109.

SUN X Z, ZHENG N, BU D P, et al. Effects of nicotinamide on the blood hormone levels,antioxidant status and immune function of cows in heat stress[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2014, 19(5):101-109. (in Chinese)

[21]
ZEITZ J O, WEBER A, MOST E, et al. Effects of supplementing rumen-protected niacin on fiber composition and metabolism of skeletal muscle in dairy cows during early lactation[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(9):8004-8020.

DOI PMID

[22]
姜锦鹏, 闻爱友, 殷定忠. 饲粮添加烟酰胺对肉鸡生长性能、脂肪沉积和小肠形态结构的影响[J]. 安徽科技学院学报, 2021, 35(5):1-6.

JIANG J P, WEN A Y, YIN D Z. Effects of dietary nicotinamide supplementation on growth performance,fat deposition and intestinal morphology of broilers[J]. Journal of Anhui Science and Technology University, 2021, 35(5):1-6. (in Chinese)

[23]
赵会会. 围产期奶山羊添加烟酰胺对羔羊糖脂代谢的影响及其机制[D].硕士学位论文. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018.

ZHAO H H. Potential mechanism of nicotinamide supplementation in perinatal dairy goat on glucose and lipid metabolism of lambs[D].Master’s Thesis. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2018. (in Chinese)

[24]
朱锦鹏, 吴昊, 冯长东, 等. 过瘤胃烟酰胺对育肥湖羊生长发育、屠宰性能和肉品质的影响[J/OL]. 中国畜牧杂志:1-9[2023-03-21]. https://doi.org/10.19556/j.0258-7033.20220712-06.

ZHU J P, WU H, FENG C D, et al. Effects of rumen protected nicotinamide on growth and development,slaughter performance and meat quality of fattening Hu sheep[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science:1-9[2023-03-21]. https://doi.org/10.19556/j.0258-7033.20220712-06. (in Chinese)

[25]
ZHANG X B, PENG Z X, LI P, et al. Complex internal microstructure of feather follicles on chicken skin promotes the bacterial cross-contamination of carcasses during the slaughtering process[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2020, 11:571913.

DOI

[26]
KRISTENSEN N B, HARMON D L. Effect of increasing ruminal butyrate absorption on splanchnic metabolism of volatile fatty acids absorbed from the washed reticulorumen of steers[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2004, 82(12):3549-3559.

PMID

[27]
陈乐祥, 杨斌, 萨茹丽, 等. 高精料饲粮对反刍动物消化道结构与功能的影响研究进展[J]. 饲料工业, 2022, 43(9):56-60.

CHEN L X, YANG B, SA R L, et al. Research progress on the effects of high-concentration diets on the structure and function of the digestive tract of ruminants[J]. Feed Industry, 2022, 43(9):56-60. (in Chinese)

[28]
SUN Z H, HE Z X, ZHANG Q L, et al. Effects of energy and protein restriction,followed by nutritional recovery on morphological development of the gastrointestinal tract of weaned kids[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2013, 91(9):4336-4344.

DOI

[29]
李贞, 王波, 李鹤琼, 等. 反刍动物肠道发育过程及影响因素[J]. 现代畜牧兽医, 2018(11):30-33.

LI Z, WANG B, LI H Q, et al. Intestinal development process and influencing factors of ruminants[J]. Modern Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2018(11):30-33. (in Chinese)

[30]
WEI X S, ZHAO H H, HE J J, et al. Maternal nicotinamide supplementation during the perinatal period modifies the small intestine morphology and antioxidative status of offspring kids[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2019, 252:41-50.

DOI

[31]
闫炎, 孟凡茹, 魏语泽, 等. 肠道紧密连接及调控通路研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2022, 58(1):44-49.

YAN Y, MENG F R, WEI Y Z, et al. Research progress on intestinal tight junction[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2022, 58(1):44-49. (in Chinese)

[32]
YE H M, LIU J H, FENG P F, et al. Grain-rich diets altered the colonic fermentation and mucosa-associated bacterial communities and induced mucosal injuries in goats[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1):20329.

DOI

[33]
ZHANG K, XU Y B, YANG Y X, et al. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites contribute negatively to hindgut barrier function development at the early weaning goat model[J]. Animal Nutrition, 2022, 10:111-123.

DOI PMID

[34]
YI Z F, TAN X, WANG Q Y, et al. Dietary niacin affects intestinal morphology and functions via modulating cell proliferation in weaned piglets[J]. Food&Function, 2021, 12(16):7402-7414.

[35]
龙凡, 梅文亮, 许兰娇, 等. 烟酸的生物学功能及其在畜禽生产中的应用[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34(7):4143-4154.

DOI

LONG F, MEI W L, XV L J, et al. Biological function of nicotinic acid and its application in livestock and poultry production[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34(7):4143-4154. (in Chinese)

DOI

[36]
GUARENTE L. Calorie restriction and sirtuins revisited[J]. Genes & Development, 2013, 27(19):2072-2085.

DOI

[37]
BIEDROŃ R, CISZEK M, TOKARCZYK M, et al. 1-Methylnicotinamide and nicotinamide:two related anti-inflammatory agents that differentially affect the functions of activated macrophages[J]. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 2008, 56(2):127-134.

DOI

[38]
侯玉洁, 徐俊, 李伟红, 等. 烟酸在反刍动物中的应用研究进展[J]. 广东饲料, 2014, 23(12):35-37.

HOU Y J, XV J, LI W H, et al. Research progress on application of niacin in ruminant production[J]. Guangdong Feed, 2014, 23(12):35-37. (in Chinese)

[39]
IGARASHI M, GUARENTE L. mTORC1 and SIRT1 cooperate to foster expansion of gut adult stem cells during calorie restriction[J]. Cell, 2016, 166(2):436-450.

DOI PMID

[40]
熊霞, 阳成波, 印遇龙. 肠道氨基酸及氨基酸转运载体研究进展[J]. 生理科学进展, 2012, 43(3):202-206.

XIONG X, YANG C B, YIN Y L. Advances in intestinal amino acids and amino acid transporters[J]. Progress in Physiological Sciences, 2012, 43(3):202-206. (in Chinese)

[41]
景小平, 彭全辉, 胡瑞, 等. 冷季补饲对藏羊小肠形态发育及营养物质转运载体基因表达量的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2017, 48(2):260-271.

JING X P, PENG Q H, HU R, et al. Effects of supplementation in cold season on morphological development of small intestine and the expression of nutrient transporter gene[J]. Acta Veterinaria Et Zootechnica Sinica, 2017, 48(2):260-271. (in Chinese)

[42]
WEI X S, YIN Q Y, ZHAO H H, et al. Metabolomics for the effect of biotin and nicotinamide on transition dairy cows[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 66(22):5723-5732.

DOI PMID

[43]
BELENKY P, BOGAN K L, BRENNER C. NAD+ metabolism in health and disease[J]. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 2007, 32(1):12-19.

DOI

[44]
NIKIFOROV A, DÖLLE C, NIERE M, et al. Pathways and subcellular compartmentation of NAD biosynthesis in human cells:from entry of extracellular precursors to mitochondrial NAD generation[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2011, 286(24):21767-21778.

DOI

[45]
MA J, WANG J, MAHFUZ S, et al. Supplementation of mixed organic acids improves growth performance, meat quality, gut morphology and volatile fatty acids of broiler chicken[J]. Animals, 2021, 11(11):3020.

DOI

[46]
KAPLAN-SHABTAI V, INDUGU N, HENNESSY M L, et al. Using structural equation modeling to understand interactions between bacterial and archaeal populations and volatile fatty acid proportions in the rumen[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12:611951.

DOI

[47]
MA J Y, PIAO X S, MAHFUZ S, et al. The interaction among gut microbes,the intestinal barrier and short chain fatty acids[J]. Animal Nutrition, 2022, 9:159-174.

DOI

[48]
LIU J H, XU T T, ZHU W Y, et al. High-grain feeding alters caecal bacterial microbiota composition and fermentation and results in caecal mucosal injury in goats[J]. The British Journal of Nutrition, 2014, 112(3):416-427.

DOI PMID

[49]
GHOSH N R, KEWALRAMANI N, KAUR H. Comparative efficacy of niacin vs nicotinamide on rumen fermentation in buffaloes fed straw based diets[J]. Buffalo Journal, 2003, 19(3):249-259.

[50]
杨艳, 欧阳克蕙, 甘兴华, 等. 不同精粗比日粮中添加烟酸对牛瘤胃体外发酵功能的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(5):76-82.

YANG Y, OU YANG K H, GAN X H, et al. Effect of adding nicotinic acid to diets with different concentrate-forage ratios on in vitro rumen fermentation function[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2021, 33(5):76-82. (in Chinese)

[51]
ASCHEMANN M, LEBZIEN P, HÜTHER L, et al. Effect of niacin supplementation on rumen fermentation characteristics and nutrient flow at the duodenum in lactating dairy cows fed a diet with a negative rumen nitrogen balance[J]. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 2012, 66(4):303-318.

PMID

[52]
DÖNMEZ N, KARSLI M A, ÇINAR A, et al. The effects of different silage additives on rumen protozoan number and volatile fatty acid concentration in sheep fed corn silage[J]. Small Ruminant Research, 2003, 48(3):227-231.

DOI

[53]
CHEN J C, YANG Z G, DONG G Z. Niacin nutrition and rumen-protected niacin supplementation in dairy cows:an updated review[J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 2019, 122(10):1103-1112.

DOI

[54]
RIDDELL D O, BARTLEY E E, DAYTON A D. Effect of nicotinic acid on microbial protein synthesis in vitro and on dairy cattle growth and milk production[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1981, 64(5):782-791.

DOI

[55]
焦毅灵, 纽俊泽, 院东, 等. 高精料条件下添加烟酸、钴和5,6-二甲基苯并咪唑复合物对绵羊消化代谢的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2023(7):40-45.

JIAO Y L, NIU J Z, YUAN D, et al. Effects of niacin,cobalt and 5,6-dimethylbenzimidazole complexes on the digestion and metabolism of sheep under high concentrate conditions[J]. China Feed, 2023(7):40-45. (in Chinese)

Outlines

/