1 材料与方法
1.1 试验设计
表1 基础饲粮组成及营养水平(风干基础)Table 1 Composition and nutrient levels of the basal diet (air-dry basis) % |
| 项目Items | 含量Content | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 原料Ingredients | |||
| 玉米Corn | 37.00 | ||
| 玉米秸秆Corn stalk | 48.00 | ||
| 豆粕Soybean meal | 7.00 | ||
| 干酒糟及其可溶物DDGS | 2.60 | ||
| 玉米胚芽粕Corn germ meal | 2.00 | ||
| 小苏打NaHCO3 | 1.00 | ||
| 谷氨酸钠蛋白质 Monosodium glutamate protein | 1.00 | ||
| 氯化钠NaCl | 0.40 | ||
| 预混料Premix1) | 1.00 | ||
| 合计Total | 100.00 | ||
| 营养水平Nutrient levels2) | |||
| 增重净能NEg/(MJ/kg) | 4.35 | ||
| 粗蛋白质CP | 10.72 | ||
| 粗脂肪EE | 2.27 | ||
| 粗灰分Ash | 5.06 | ||
| 酸性洗涤纤维NDF | 39.88 | ||
| 中性洗涤纤维ADF | 23.96 | ||
| 钙Ca | 0.44 | ||
| 磷P | 0.30 | ||
| 维生素E Vitamin E/(IU/kg) | 32.38 |
1)每千克预混料含有 One kilogram of the premix contained the following:VA 500 000 IU,VD 150 000 IU,VE 2 400 IU,Fe 500 mg,Cu 1 000 mg,Zn 2 400 mg,Mn 1 500 mg,Se 45 mg,Co 15 mg。 2)增重净能根据《肉牛饲养标准》(NY/T 815—2004)计算得出,其余为实测值。NEg was calculated according to Feeding Standard of Beef Cattle (NY/T 815—2004), while the others were measured values. |
1.2 饲养管理
1.3 样品采集
1.3.1 消化试验饲粮和粪便样品采集
1.3.2 小肠组织采集
1.3.3 肉样采集
1.4 测定指标及方法
1.4.1 生长性能
1.4.2 养分表观消化率
1.4.3 肠道形态
1.4.4 肉品质
1.4.5 肉样MMP活性和维生素E含量
1.4.6 肉样贮藏期总挥发性盐基氮(total volatile basic nitrogen,TVB-N)含量
1.5 数据统计分析
2 结果与分析
2.1 补饲维生素E对育肥后期延边牛生长性能的影响
表2 补饲维生素E对育肥后期延边牛生长性能的影响Table 2 Effects of vitamin E supplementation on growth performance of Yanbian cattle in late fattening period |
| 项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | 试验组 Experimental group | P值 P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 初重IBW/kg | 487.00±44.23 | 483.75±43.47 | 0.865 |
| 末重FBW/kg | 588.60±51.64 | 601.13±49.44 | 0.589 |
| 平均日增重ADG/(kg/d) | 1.13±0.14b | 1.30±0.13a | 0.031 |
| 平均日采食量ADFI/(kg/d) | 10.70±0.03 | 10.68±0.05 | 0.977 |
| 料重比F/G | 9.59±1.11 | 8.42±0.77 | 0.077 |
同行数据肩标不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05),不同大写字母表示差异极显著(P<0.01),无字母表示差异不显著(P>0.05)。下表同。 | |
In the same row, values with different small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P<0.05), while with different capital letter superscripts mean extremely significant difference (P<0.01), and with no letter superscripts mean no significant difference (P>0.05). The same as below. |
2.2 补饲维生素E对育肥后期延边牛养分表观消化率的影响
表3 补饲维生素E对育肥后期延边牛养分表观消化率的影响Table 3 Effects of vitamin E supplementation on nutrient apparent digestibility of Yanbian cattle in late fattening period % |
| 项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | 试验组 Experimental group | P值 P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 干物质DM | 65.28±1.89 | 66.79±2.24 | 0.089 |
| 粗蛋白质CP | 51.25±1.58b | 53.02±1.75a | 0.016 |
| 粗脂肪EE | 65.79±2.33b | 68.40±2.40a | 0.013 |
| 粗灰分Ash | 39.04±2.35 | 40.28±1.18 | 0.202 |
| 酸性洗涤纤维ADF | 51.42±2.08 | 52.83±1.36 | 0.062 |
| 中性洗涤纤维NDF | 63.10±1.91 | 64.18±1.73 | 0.159 |
| 钙Ca | 34.14±1.22 | 34.46±1.19 | 0.605 |
| 磷P | 55.41±1.42 | 56.69±1.17 | 0.069 |
2.3 补饲维生素E对育肥后期延边牛肠道形态的影响
表4 补饲维生素E对育肥后期延边牛十二指肠形态的影响Table 4 Effects of vitamin E supplementation on duodenal morphology of Yanbian cattle in late fattening period |
| 项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | 试验组 Experimental group | P值 P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 绒毛高度Villus height/μm | 344.22±27.16B | 378.22±35.71A | 0.005 |
| 隐窝深度Crypt depth/μm | 141.14±12.81A | 128.49±10.62B | 0.002 |
| 绒毛高度/隐窝深度V/C | 2.45±0.16B | 2.95±0.17A | <0.001 |
2.4 补饲维生素E对育肥后期延边牛肉品质的影响
表5 补饲维生素E对育肥后期延边牛肉品质的影响Table 5 Effects of vitamin E supplementation on meat quality of Yanbian cattle in late fattening period |
| 项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | 试验组 Experimental group | P值 P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH24 h | 5.56±0.06 | 5.58±0.04 | 0.204 |
| 滴水损失Drip loss/% | 4.20±0.60 | 3.75±0.42 | 0.063 |
| 蒸煮损失Cooking loss/% | 34.27±1.50 | 32.69±1.33 | 0.082 |
| 剪切力Shear force/N | 61.01±3.58 | 58.69±3.16 | 0.057 |
| 肌纤维直径Muscle fiber diameter/μm | 54.25±2.10a | 52.51±2.49b | 0.039 |
| 化学成分Chemical composition | |||
| 水分Moisture/% | 65.29±1.19 | 66.07±1.25 | 0.115 |
| 肌内脂肪Intramuscular fat/% | 9.30±1.10B | 10.87±1.49A | 0.001 |
| 粗蛋白质CP/% | 20.47±1.05 | 21.16±2.01 | 0.205 |
| 粗灰分Ash/% | 1.14±0.23 | 1.20±0.31 | 0.520 |
表6 补饲维生素E对育肥后期延边牛肉贮藏期肉色的影响Table 6 Effects of vitamin E supplementation on meat color during storage period of Yanbian cattle in late fattening period |
| 项目 Items | 贮藏天数 Storage days/d | 对照组 Control group | 试验组 Experimental group | P值 P-value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 亮度L* | 1 | 29.80±1.74 | 28.78±1.52 | 0.081 | |||||
| 4 | 30.27±1.22 | 29.47±1.06 | 0.066 | ||||||
| 7 | 32.13±2.39 | 30.83±1.29 | 0.055 | ||||||
| 10 | 33.47±2.42 | 31.78±2.46 | 0.057 | ||||||
| 14 | 35.13±2.10 | 33.78±1.77 | 0.053 | ||||||
| 红度a* | 1 | 17.07±2.49b | 19.11±2.27a | 0.020 | |||||
| 4 | 16.47±2.64b | 18.22±2.10a | 0.042 | ||||||
| 7 | 15.13±1.96b | 17.22±2.51a | 0.013 | ||||||
| 10 | 14.73±2.55b | 16.72±2.19a | 0.022 | ||||||
| 14 | 13.80±2.34b | 15.44±1.95a | 0.035 | ||||||
| 黄度b* | 1 | 7.47±1.36 | 6.56±1.65 | 0.098 | |||||
| 4 | 7.87±1.30 | 7.22±1.31 | 0.168 | ||||||
| 7 | 8.47±1.41 | 7.56±1.25 | 0.058 | ||||||
| 10 | 8.87±1.36 | 8.33±1.03 | 0.209 | ||||||
| 14 | 9.27±1.28 | 8.61±1.29 | 0.155 |
2.5 补饲维生素E对育肥后期延边牛肉中MMP活性和维生素E含量的影响
表7 补饲维生素E对育肥后期延边牛肉中MMP活性和维生素E含量的影响Table 7 Effects of vitamin E supplementation on MMP activity and vitamin E content in meat of Yanbian cattle in late fattening period |
| 项目 Items | 对照组 Control group | 试验组 Experimental group | P值 P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 基质金属蛋白酶2 MMP2/(ng/g) | 176.55±26.65 | 184.73±32.88 | 0.505 |
| 基质金属蛋白酶9 MMP9/(ng/g) | 9.78±0.64 | 10.00±0.34 | 0.261 |
| 基质金属蛋白酶13 MMP13/(ng/g) | 83.03±17.72b | 100.11±20.15a | 0.038 |
| 维生素E Vitamin E/(μg/g) | 1.80±0.36B | 4.21±0.73A | <0.001 |
2.6 补饲维生素E对育肥后期延边牛肉贮藏期TVB-N含量的影响
表8 补饲维生素E对育肥后期延边牛肉贮藏期TVB-N含量的影响Table 8 Effects of vitamin E supplementation on TVB-N content in meat during storage period of Yanbian cattle in late fattening period mg/100 g |
| 贮藏天数 Storage days/d | 对照组 Control group | 试验组 Experimental group | P值 P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.05±1.06 | 8.95±0.52 | 0.872 |
| 4 | 13.49±1.33A | 9.50±0.42B | <0.001 |
| 7 | 18.14±3.12A | 12.70±0.39B | 0.009 |
| 10 | 31.56±1.41A | 25.86±1.08B | 0.001 |
| 14 | 36.46±1.49A | 26.97±1.89B | <0.001 |
