1 材料与方法
1.1 试验材料
1.2 试验设计
表1 基础饲粮组成及营养水平(风干基础)Table 1 Composition and nutrient levels of basal diets (air-dry basis) % |
| 项目 Items | 含量Content | |
|---|---|---|
| 1~21日龄 1 to 21 days of age | 22~42日龄 22 to 42 days of age | |
| 原料Ingredients | ||
| 玉米Corn | 59.13 | 60.77 |
| 豆粕Soybean meal | 35.15 | 32.00 |
| 大豆油Soybean oil | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| 磷酸氢钙CaHPO4 | 1.66 | 1.53 |
| 石粉Limestone | 1.40 | 1.23 |
| DL-蛋氨酸DL-Met | 0.20 | 0.10 |
| L-赖氨酸L-Lys | 0.09 | |
| 食盐NaCl | 0.37 | 0.37 |
| 预混料Premix1) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 合计Total | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 营养水平Nutrient levels2) | ||
| 代谢能ME/(MJ/kg) | 12.34 | 12.91 |
| 粗蛋白质CP | 20.70 | 19.30 |
| 钙Ca | 1.00 | 0.90 |
| 总磷TP | 0.68 | 0.64 |
| 有效磷AP | 0.43 | 0.41 |
| 赖氨酸Lys | 1.15 | 1.00 |
| 蛋氨酸Met | 0.52 | 0.41 |
| 蛋氨酸+胱氨酸Met+Cys | 0.88 | 0.75 |
1)预混料为每千克饲粮提供 The premix provided the following per kg of diets:VA 12 000 IU,VD3 4 350 IU,VE 3 IU,VK3 3.9 mg,VB1 3 mg,VB2 7.5 mg,VB6 4.2 mg,VB12 0.3 mg,D-生物素 D-biotin 0.15 mg,叶酸 folic acid 1.2 mg,烟酰胺 nicotinamide 33 mg,D-泛酸 D-pantothenic acid 12 mg,Cu (as basic copper chloride) 5.1 mg,Fe (as ferrous sulfate) 72 mg,Mn (as manganese sulfate) 83 mg,Zn (as zinc sulfate) 56 mg,I (as calcium iodate) 0.56 mg,Se (as sodium selenite) 0.21 mg。 | |
2)粗蛋白质、钙和总磷含量为测定值,其余为计算值。CP, Ca and TP were determined values, while the others were calculated values. |
1.3 饲养管理
1.4 测定指标及方法
1.4.1 生长性能
1.4.2 血清和肝脏抗氧化指标
1.4.3 血清免疫指标
1.4.4 盲肠微生物区系
1.5 数据统计和分析
2 结果与分析
2.1 复合益生菌对肉鸡生长性能的影响
表2 复合益生菌对肉鸡生长性能的影响Table 2 Effects of compound probiotics on growth performance of broilers |
| 项目 Items | 初始体重 Initial BW/g | 终末体重 Final BW/g | 平均日采食量 ADFI/ (g/d) | 平均日增重 ADG (g/d) | 料重比 F/G | 腹泻率 DR/% | 死亡率 MR/% | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1~21日龄1 to 21 days of age | |||||||||||||||
| 对照组 Control group | 44.68 ±0.48 | 626.28 ±13.79 | 36.94 ±0.94 | 27.70 ±0.66 | 1.33 ±0.03 | 9.37 ±1.15a | 0.40 ±0.19a | ||||||||
| 试验组 Experimental group | 44.75 ±0.46 | 615.67 ±18.50 | 36.44 ±1.12 | 27.19 ±0.88 | 1.34 ±0.02 | 6.75 ±0.36b | 0.08 ±0.19b | ||||||||
| P值P-value | 0.811 | 0.286 | 0.418 | 0.281 | 0.621 | 0.018 | <0.001 | ||||||||
| 22~42日龄22 to 42 days of age | |||||||||||||||
| 对照组 Control group | 626.28 ±13.79 | 1 814.43 ±66.06 | 103.81 ±3.94 | 56.58 ±2.98 | 1.84 ±0.07 | 3.41 ±0.47a | 0.00 ±0.00 | ||||||||
| 试验组 Experimental group | 615.67 ±18.50 | 1 824.87 ±44.61 | 107.05 ±7.16 | 57.58 ±1.71 | 1.86 ±0.08 | 1.82 ±0.36b | 0.00 ±0.00 | ||||||||
| P值P-value | 0.286 | 0.755 | 0.354 | 0.491 | 0.654 | <0.001 | 1.000 | ||||||||
| 1~42日龄1 to 42 days of age | |||||||||||||||
| 对照组 Control group | 44.68 ±0.48 | 1 814.43 ±66.06 | 70.37 ±2.21 | 42.14 ±1.56 | 1.67 ±0.04 | 6.39 ±0.65a | 0.20 ±0.10a | ||||||||
| 试验组 Experimental group | 44.75 ±0.46 | 1 824.87 ±44.61 | 71.74 ±4.01 | 42.38 ±1.06 | 1.69 ±0.06 | 4.29 ±0.21b | 0.04 ±0.10b | ||||||||
| P值P-value | 0.811 | 0.755 | 0.756 | 0.485 | 0.484 | 0.018 | <0.001 | ||||||||
同列数据肩标不同字母表示差异显著(P<0.05),无字母表示差异不显著(P>0.05)。下表同。 | |
In the same column, values with different letter superscripts mean significant differences (P<0.05), while with no letter superscripts mean no significant differences (P>0.05). The same as below. |
2.2 复合益生菌对肉鸡血清和肝脏抗氧化指标的影响
表3 复合益生菌对肉鸡血清抗氧化指标的影响Table 3 Effects of compound probiotics on serum antioxidant indices of broilers |
| 项目 Items | 丙二醛 MDA/(nmol/mL) | 过氧化氢酶 CAT/(U/mL) | 总抗氧化能力 T-AOC/(U/mL) | 超氧化物歧化酶 SOD/(U/mL) | 谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶 GSH-Px/(U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组Control group | 1.94±0.07a | 7.38±1.34 | 0.94±0.12 | 17.88±3.01b | 1 706.25±59.39b |
| 试验组Experimental group | 1.71±0.18b | 6.84±1.06 | 1.19±0.32 | 44.59±3.84a | 1 965.00±99.27a |
| P值P-value | 0.012 | 0.455 | 0.111 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
表4 复合益生菌对肉鸡肝脏抗氧化指标的影响Table 4 Effects of compound probiotics on liver antioxidant indices of broilers |
| 项目 Items | 丙二醛 MDA/ (nmol/mg prot) | 过氧化氢酶 CAT/ (U/mg prot) | 总抗氧化能力 T-AOC/ (U/mg prot) | 超氧化物 歧化酶 SOD/ (U/mg prot) | 谷胱甘肽 过氧化物酶 GSH-Px/ (U/mg prot) | 谷胱甘肽- S-转移酶 GST/ (U/mg prot) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组Control group | 7.22±1.00a | 0.38±0.04 | 1.28±0.20 | 21.10±4.07 | 248.23±57.32 | 348.73±42.56 |
| 试验组Experimental group | 3.64±0.80b | 0.38±0.06 | 1.22±0.21 | 22.33±2.73 | 241.06±43.68 | 342.88±30.30 |
| P值P-value | <0.001 | 0.913 | 0.571 | 0.553 | 0.812 | 0.789 |
2.3 复合益生菌对肉鸡血清免疫指标的影响
表5 复合益生菌对肉鸡血清免疫指标的影响Table 5 Effects of compound probiotics on serum immune indices of broilers |
| 项目 Items | 白细胞 介素-6 IL-6/ (pg/mL) | 白细胞 介素-1β IL-1β/ (pg/mL) | 肿瘤坏死 因子-α TNF-α/ (pg/mL) | 免疫球 蛋白A IgA/ (μg/mL) | 免疫球 蛋白G IgG/ (g/mL) | 免疫球 蛋白M IgM/ (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组Control group | 36.13±3.48a | 179.78±9.29 | 116.38±8.19a | 1 685.39±144.97 | 30.12±0.34 | 2 351.25±134.65b |
| 试验组 Experimental group | 30.86±1.14b | 167.60±14.61 | 81.33±2.38b | 1 743.37±32.35 | 30.86±2.20 | 2 643.23±81.27a |
| P值P-value | 0.028 | 0.209 | <0.001 | 0.465 | 0.552 | 0.010 |
