Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition >
Research Progress on Influencing Factors of Leymus chinensis Silage Quality
Received date: 2025-07-17
Online published: 2026-03-16
Leymus chinensis is the main feed for herbivorous animals such as cattle and sheep, with rich nutrient content, and serves as a key forage for livestock fattening in summer and autumn. Silage is one of the important methods for the efficient preservation and utilization of Leymus chinensis, which can achieve maximum nutrient retention through anaerobic fermentation while improving its palatability and nutritional value. Currently, relevant research on Leymus chinensis silage mainly focuses on modulation technologies such as cutting length, moisture content, compaction density, harvest time and mixed silage, as well as the application of silage additives and the dynamic changes of microbial community structure. Based on this, this review summarizes the influencing factors of Leymus chinensis silage quality and discusses future research directions, aiming to provide references for optimizing Leymus chinensis silage technology and improving feed utilization efficiency.
NA Ya , JIANG Rong , SUN Nan , GE Gentu . Research Progress on Influencing Factors of Leymus chinensis Silage Quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2026 , 38(3) : 1595 -1601 . DOI: 10.12418/CJAN2026.127
| [1] |
内蒙古农牧学院. 牧草及饲料作物栽培学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1981:162-166.
Inner Mongolia College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry. Cultivation science of forage and feed crops[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1981:162-166. (in Chinese)
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
侯建建, 娜日苏, 罗海玲, 等. 切碎长度对不同牧草青贮饲料发酵品质的影响[J]. 中国奶牛, 2016(6):13-17.
|
| [7] |
文生萍, 窦永芳, 黄晶. 不同乳酸菌添加剂和切割长度对牧草青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2018(14):28-31.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
陈诚, 海鸽, 杨春艳, 等. 装填密度和化学添加剂对羊草青贮品质的影响[C]// 2018中国草学会年会论文集. 成都: 中国草学会, 2018:82-84.
|
| [12] |
刘逸超, 司强, 刘明健, 等. 装填密度对羊草和苜蓿青贮品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1):263-271.
|
| [13] |
张佳伟, 贾玉山, 王志军, 等. 羊草和蒙古韭的不同混合比例对其青贮品质的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(19):93-96.
|
| [14] |
赵鹤. 羊草对奶牛营养价值及其日粮组合效应的研究[D].硕士学位论文. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2008.
|
| [15] |
张庆. 饲草青贮用乳酸菌的筛选及作用机理[D].博士学位论文. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2016.
|
| [16] |
刘逸超, 那亚, 张育涵, 等. 收获时期和青贮时间对羊草裹包青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(11):3654-3660.
|
| [17] |
王敏玲, 孙海霞, 钟荣珍, 等. 利用体外消化率评价青贮品质的问题探讨[J]. 草地学报, 2011, 19(4):678-681.
|
| [18] |
孙娟娟, 玉柱, 薛艳林, 等. 添加剂对羊草青贮发酵品质和体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2007, 15(3):238-242.
|
| [19] |
潘春方, 李洋, 张立阳, 等. 添加干饲草对湿玉米纤维饲料发酵品质的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2017, 38(1):51-57.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
高龙, 张娟, 戈辰妍, 等. 添加植物乳杆菌、布氏乳杆菌对杂交狼尾草青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(12):3867-3875.
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
刘逸超, 王志军, 包健, 等. 糖类对羊草青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2023, 46(16):91-96.
|
| [26] |
徐生阳, 孙志强, 玉柱. 不同添加剂对羊草青贮品质的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2020, 43(9):90-94.
|
| [27] |
王建, 赵单. 不同添加剂对青贮羊草化学成分、发酵品质及好氧稳定性的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2021(22):19-22.
|
| [28] |
刘逸超, 孙鹏波, 张佳伟, 等. 发酵抑制剂对羊草青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8):2564-2570.
|
| [29] |
韩立英, 玉柱. 3种乳酸菌制剂对苜蓿和羊草的青贮效果[J]. 草业科学, 2009, 26(2):66-71.
|
| [30] |
张庆, 玉柱, 田吉鹏. 羊草晾晒过程中淋雨后进行青贮的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2013, 21(1):196-201.
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
周天荣, 原庆琳, 石朋祥, 等. 不同乳酸菌添加剂对羊草青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2025, 48(9):124-128.
|
| [33] |
罗俊杰, 肖燕子, 侯美玲, 等. 不同添加剂对苜蓿与羊草混合青贮品质及维生素含量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(3):992-1000.
|
| [34] |
黄秋连, 周昕, 王健, 等. 添加乳酸菌、糖蜜和无机酸对羊草青贮饲料发酵品质及体外干物质消失率的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(1):420-427.
|
| [35] |
李雨航. 糖蜜与乳酸菌添加对禾豆混播饲草青贮品质及微生物多样性的影响[D].硕士学位论文. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2024.
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
闫雨婷, 赵牧其尔, 珠拉, 等. 不同添加剂对羊草青贮品质的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2025, 37(7):4796-4809.
|
| [38] |
杨红, 张庆, 侯建建, 等. 生物添加剂对羊草青贮饲料超微结构和纤维变化的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(12):94-101.
|
| [39] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |