Molecular Nutrition

Effects of Compound Enzyme Preparation on Nutrient Utilization Rate and Metabolize Energy of Several Residue Type Ingredients

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410205, China;
    2. Hunan Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Changsha 410131, China;
    3. Hunan Collaborative Innovation Center of Animal Production Safety, Changsha 410128, China

Received date: 2017-06-05

  Online published: 2017-12-04

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine nutrient utilization and metabolize energy of several residue type ingredients (distiller's grains, brewer's grains, two kinds of soy sauce residues, Ganoderma lucidum bran, citrus dregs and sugar cane residues) of Linwu ducks, and compound enzyme preparation (protease, cellulose and xylanase) addition on nutrient utilization and metabolize energy of several residue type ingredients. Forty-eight healthy adult male Linwu ducks with body weight about 2.0 kg were randomly divided into 8 groups and 6 replicates in each group and 1 duck in each replicate. Metabolic tests were carried out by hunger strike-gavage method. The test diets were mixed by test ingredient and nitrogen-free diet according to the ratio of 1:2, two groups tests for each ingredient were divided into control group and supplemented with compound enzyme preparation group (supplemented with 250 mg/kg compound enzyme preparation in test ingredient). Two batch metabolic tests were carried out. The nutrient utilization rate and metabolic energy of seven residue type ingredients supplemented with compound enzyme preparation for Linwu ducks were determined. The results show that the apparent utilization rates of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE) and crude fiber (CF) of several residue type ingredients were 30.73% to 51.08%, 17.65% to 75.62%, 10.85% to 91.19% and 10.84% to 67.05% for Linwu ducks, respectively, the apparent metabolic energy (AME) and true metabolic energy (TME) were 4.58 to 15.20 MJ/kg and 5.57 to 17.17 MJ/kg, respectively. Adding with compound enzyme preparation, the effective nutrients improvement value (ENIV) of DM, CP, EE and CF were 6.46 to 41.37 g/kg, 0.33 to 13.23 g/kg, 0.09 to 9.73 g/kg and 0.70 to 7.84 g/kg, respectively, and the TME improved by 0.13 to 1.68 MJ/kg. The results indicate that residue type ingredients supplemented with compound enzyme preparation can improve nutrient utilization rates and metabolize energy of Linwu ducks.

Cite this article

ZHANG Xu, HUANG Xuan, LI Chuang, WANG Xiangrong, JIANG Guitao, WU Duanqin, DAI Qiuzhong . Effects of Compound Enzyme Preparation on Nutrient Utilization Rate and Metabolize Energy of Several Residue Type Ingredients[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2017 , 29(12) : 4433 -4439 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.12.023

References

[1] 王彦茹,曾秋凤,张克英,等.啤酒糟对31-59日龄建昌麻羽肉鸭生产性能、血液生化指标及胃肠道发育的影响[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(3):807-815.

[2] CAPARRA P,FOTI F,SCERRA M,et al.Solar-dried citrus pulp as an alternative energy source in lamb diets:effects on growth and carcass and meat quality[J].Small Ruminant Research,2007,68(3):303-311.  

[3] 吴兆鹏,谭文兴,蚁细苗,等.甘蔗渣的饲用价值及其作为饲料应用的研究进展[J].中国牛业科学,2016,42(5):41-45.

[4] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].3版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007.

[5] 冯定远,沈水宝.饲料酶制剂理论与实践的新理念——加酶日粮ENIV系统的建立和应用[J].饲料工业,2005,26(18):1-7.

[6] 何胜强,李晶,宋代军.白酒糟对肉鸭饲喂价值的研究[J].饲料博览,2010(3):19-21.

[7] 方圆,夏先林,方福平,等.白酒糟饲喂三穗鸭的增重及饲料转化效果[J].贵州农业科学,2014,42(3):102-105.

[8] VAN KRIMPEN M M,KWAKKEL R P,VAN DER PEET-SCHWERING C M C,et al.Effects of nutrient dilution and nonstarch polysaccharide concentration in rearing an laying diets on eating behavior and feather damage of rearing and laying hens[J].Poultry Science,2009,88(4):759-773.  

[9] 张拴峰.影响肉鸭羽毛生长的营养因素及其改善措施[J].中国家禽,2011,33(16):50-51,53.

[10] DENSTADLI V,WESTERENG B,BINIYAM H G,et al.Effects of structure and xylanase treatment of brewers' spent grain on performance and nutrient availability in broiler chickens[J].British Poultry Science,2010,51(3):419-426.  

[11] 孙建钢,曹日亮,赵娟.酱油渣在猪育肥中的应用试验[J].畜牧与饲料科学,2009,30(1):83-84.

[12] 张彦.灰树花菌丝体与子实体的营养功能成分分析[J].食品科学,2002,23(1):137-139.

[13] 黄毅.食用菌栽培[M].3版.北京:高等教育出版社,2008:166-167,195-196.

[14] 刘建昌,潘延国,苏水金,等.菌糠替代麸皮喂猪的饲养试验[J].中国畜牧杂志,1998,34(2):26-27.

[15] 李进杰,蒋明琴,刘燕.香菇菌糠代替部分麸皮饲喂生长期肉兔效果试验[J].畜牧与兽医,2014,46(3):47-49.

[16] 张石蕊,陈铁壁,金宏.柑橘加工副产品中饲料营养物质的测定[J].饲料研究,2004(1):28-29.

[17] 钟良琴,刘作华,王永才,等.柑橘渣的饲用价值研究[J].饲料研究,2010(1):74-77.

[18] 包健,盛永帅,蔡旋,等.鲜食大豆秸秆、茭白鞘叶和甘蔗渣营养成分和瘤胃降解率的研究[J].饲料研究,2015(15):33-38.

[19] ADEOLA O.鸭用饲料能值的参考值.中国饲料数据库[J].中国饲料,2006,22:37.
Outlines

/