Effects of Compound Bacteria Culture on Performance, Immune Function and Antioxidant Capacity of Sows

  • LI Xueqiang ,
  • CUI Ying ,
  • HAO Lingkui ,
  • YANG Jingjing ,
  • GAO Min ,
  • HU Honglian ,
  • LIU Dacheng
Expand
  • 1. College of Veterinary, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China;
    2. Research Institute of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Inner Mongolia Academy of Animal Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China

Received date: 2019-04-15

  Online published: 2019-11-19

Abstract

This study aimed to research the effects of compound bacteria culture on the performance, immune function and antioxidant capacity of sows, which would provide a theoretical basis for the application of the preparations in pig production. In this study, 40 Canadian sows with similar parity, body weight and labor period were selected and randomly divided into control group and experimental group with 4 replicates in each group and 5 sows in each replicate. Sows in the control group were fed a basal diet, while those in the experimental group were fed the basal diet supplemented with 10% compound bacteria culture. The testing period lasted for 40 days. The litter situation, feed intake and constipation of sows were recorded, and the data of the birth weight and weaning weight at 20 days of piglets were collected. Within the 24 h of delivery and postpartum 20 days, the blood was collected from the marginal ear vein to determine the immune parameters and antioxidant indexes. The results showed that, compared with the control group, the number of stillbirths per litter in the experimental group reduced by 45.45% (P<0.01), the average daily intake of each sow in experimental group was 0.6 kg which was more than that in the control group (P<0.01), and the average constipation degree of sows decreased by 59.10% (P<0.01) in the experimental group in 7 days before delivery. The average body weight of suckling piglets at 20 days of age was 0.57 kg which was more than that in the control group (P<0.05), with a 12.64% increasing. Compared with the control group, the serum total cholesterol content and alkaline phosphatase activity of sows during delivery in the experimental group increased by 6.39% and 27.55% (P<0.05), respectively, and the serum urea nitrogen content of sows during delivery in the experimental group decreased by 19.18% (P<0.05). The serum contents of immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M of sows in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the serum total antioxidant capacity of sows at weanling in the experimental group increased by 6.25% (P<0.05), and the serum glutathione peroxidase activity of sows during delivery increased by 24.26% (P<0.05). In conclusion, the compound bacteria culture can significantly reduce the litter stillbirth number of sows and the prenatal constipation of sows, increase the feed intake of sows and the growth performance of suckling piglets, and significantly improve the immune function and enhance the antioxidant capacity of sows.

Cite this article

LI Xueqiang , CUI Ying , HAO Lingkui , YANG Jingjing , GAO Min , HU Honglian , LIU Dacheng . Effects of Compound Bacteria Culture on Performance, Immune Function and Antioxidant Capacity of Sows[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019 , 31(11) : 5345 -5353 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.11.052

References

[1] 陈如水,付瑞珍,石宁,等.发酵饲料对母猪繁殖性能的影响[J].现代畜牧兽医,2016(5):13-17.
[2] 王小明,王兆凤,杨在宾,等.发酵饲料对母猪和哺乳仔猪生产性能和粪便微生物的影响[J].猪业科学,2018,35(7):88-91.
[3] 古金元,彭涛,胡东方,等.浅谈妊娠母猪生理特性及发酵饲料对其影响[J].猪业科学,2017,34(7):94-96.
[4] 熊立寅,田科雄.发酵饲料对母猪繁殖性能的影响[J].湖南饲料,2015(2):24-26,34.
[5] 郭鹏.奶牛微生物发酵饲料组方及配套使用技术的研究[D].硕士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2016.
[6] 卢德勋.营养活性物质组学产品研发和应用的理论和实践[J].饲料工业,2018,39(1):2-6.
[7] 李玉侠,舒丹平,张晓杰,等.发酵饲料替代抗生素在断奶仔猪日粮中的应用[J].饲料博览,2018(1):17-20.
[8] 杨加梅,肖伟伟,唐玲,等.大豆酶解蛋白对哺乳母猪生产性能、营养物质代谢、抗氧化和免疫功能的影响[J].饲料研究,2017(20):16-21.
[9] 胡明德,杨葆春,刘永福.EM制剂对母猪繁殖性能的效果研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2003(12):35.
[10] 王辉,霍伟.发酵饲料对妊娠母猪生产性能的影响[J].山东畜牧兽医,2015(2):18.
[11] FORESTIER C,DE CHAMPS C,VATOUX C,et al.Probiotic activities of Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus:in vitro adherence to intestinal cells and antimicrobial properties[J].Research in Microbiology,2001,152(2):167-173.  
[12] 董佳琦,金三俊,汪晶晶,等.复合益生菌发酵液对哺乳母猪生产性能、血清生化及免疫指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(1):343-349.
[13] 穆会杰.湿态发酵豆粕对母猪繁殖性能、血清生化指标及粪中微生物菌群的影响[D].硕士学位论文.郑州:河南农业大学,2015.
[14] 李永新,王强,周洪波,等.抗菌肽饲料添加剂对母猪生产性能的影响[J].饲料工业,2009,30(15):20-21.
[15] 魏金涛,赵娜,杨雪海,等.发酵饲料对断奶仔猪生产性能、血液生化指标和饲料养分表观消化率的影响[J].中国粮油学报,2009,24(2):129-133.
[16] CANIBE N,JENSEN B B.Fermented and nonfermented liquid feed to growing pigs:effect on aspects of gastrointestinal ecology and growth performance[J].Journal of Animal Science,2003,81(8):2019-2031.  
[17] 李华伟,祝倩,姬玉娇,等.中药渣对泌乳母猪及其仔猪血浆生化参数和抗氧化能力的影响[J].动物营养学报,2017,29(6):2100-2107.
[18] 林标声,罗建,戴爱玲,等.微生物发酵饲料对断奶仔猪生长性能的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(5):2378-2380.
[19] 王文娟,孙冬岩,孙笑非,等.母猪便秘的原因及防制对策[J].饲料研究,2011(10):75-77.
[20] 任红立,汪晶晶,金三俊,等.妊娠后期饲粮中添加乳酸菌与酵母菌的复合菌对母猪繁殖性能、血浆脂质代谢和抗氧化能力的影响[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(4):1457-1464.
[21] 辛小召.湿态发酵豆粕及发酵浓缩料研制及对泌乳母猪生产性能、血液生化指标、粪便微生物菌群的影响[D].硕士学位论文.郑州:河南农业大学,2014.
[22] 汪晶晶,任红立,董佳琦,等.微生态制剂和复合酸化剂对哺乳母猪生产性能、血清生化和免疫指标以及乳成分的影响[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(2):685-695.
[23] 余淼,严锦绣,彭忠利,等.微生物发酵饲料对肉牛免疫机能的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2013,40(4):114-117.
[24] 王娟娟,王顺喜,陆文清,等.无抗生素微生物发酵饲料对仔猪免疫及抗氧化功能的影响[J].中国饲料,2011(16):25-27.
[25] DOBLADO R,ZIELINSKI H,PISKULA M,et al.Effect of processing on the antioxidant vitamins and antioxidant capacity of Vigna sinensis var. Carilla[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2005,53(4):1215-1222.  
[26] 杨郁荭,白明.乳酸菌抗氧化机理的初步探讨[J].中国乳业,2011(7):68-73.
Outlines

/