Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Grape Seed Proanthocyanidins on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance, Meat Quality and Serum Antioxidant Indexes of Lambs

YANG Wenjun; MU Chuntang; WANG Pengju; ZHANG Muzhou; ZHENG Weicai; HAO Xiaoyan; ZHANG Jianxin

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.06.035

2020 , Vol. 32 >Issue 6: 2755 - 2764

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.06.035

Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Grape Seed Proanthocyanidins on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance, Meat Quality and Serum Antioxidant Indexes of Lambs

YANG Wenjun ,
MU Chuntang ,
WANG Pengju ,
ZHANG Muzhou ,
ZHENG Weicai ,
HAO Xiaoyan ,
ZHANG Jianxin

Expand

College of Animal Science and Technology, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China

Received date: 2019-12-13

Online published: 2020-06-16

Fold

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation of grape seed proanthocyanidins on growth performance, slaughter performance, meat quality and serum antioxidant indexes of lambs. Forty-eight 4-month-old Dorper×thin-tailed Han F1 hybrid ram lambs with similar body weight [(22.75±1.20) kg] were randomly divided into four groups with twelve lambs in each group. Lambs in four groups were fed basic diets and supplemented with 0 (control group), 10 (10GSPs group), 20 (20GSPs group) and 40 mg/kg BW (40GSPs group) grape seed proanthocyanidins, respectively. The pre-experimental period lasted for 15 days, and the experimental period lasted for 45 days. The results showed as follows: 1) the final body weight of 10GSPs and 20GSPs groups was significantly higher than that of the control group (P≤0.05). The average daily gain and average daily feed intake of 10GSPs and 20GSPs groups were significantly higher than those of the control group (P≤0.05). There was no significant difference in feed to gain ratio among all groups (P>0.05). 2) The live weight before slaughter of 10GSPs and 20GSPs groups was significantly higher than that of the control group (P≤0.05). The carcass weight and net meat weight of 10GSPs, 20GSPs and 40GSPs groups were significantly higher than those of the control group (P≤0.05). The eye muscle area of 40GSPs groups was significantly higher than that of the control group (P≤0.05). There were no significant differences in organ indexes among all groups (P>0.05). 3) The redness value after slaughter 1 h of 20GSPs group was significantly higher than that of control group and 10GSPs group (P≤0.05). The longissimus dorsi shear force of 20GSPs and 40GSPs groups was significantly lower than that of control group and 10GSPs group (P≤0.05). There were no significant differences in contents of moisture, crude ash, ether extract and crude protein in longissimus dorsi among all groups (P>0.05). 4) Compared with the control group, the activities of superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase in serum were significantly increased (P≤0.05). In conclusion, dietary appropriate supplementation of grape seed proanthocyanidins can improve the growth performance and slaughter performance of lambs, and improve muscle quality. The recommended dietary supplemental dosage of grape seed proanthocyanidins is 20 mg/kg BW under the condition of this experiment.

Key words： grape seed proanthocyanidins; lambs; growth performance; slaughter performance; meat quality; antioxidant capacity

Cite this article

YANG Wenjun , MU Chuntang , WANG Pengju , ZHANG Muzhou , ZHENG Weicai , HAO Xiaoyan , ZHANG Jianxin . Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Grape Seed Proanthocyanidins on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance, Meat Quality and Serum Antioxidant Indexes of Lambs[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020 , 32(6) : 2755 -2764 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.06.035

References

[1] 王磊.冬季舍饲密度对羊舍环境及肉羊生产性能影响的研究[D].硕士学位论文.石河子:石河子大学,2015.
[2] 施力光,赵春萍,曹婷,等.不同日粮精粗比对海南黑山羊抗氧化性能的影响[J].中国草食动物科学,2015,35(1):29-31.
[3] KIM H S,QUON M J,KIM J A.New insights into the mechanisms of polyphenols beyond antioxidant properties;lessons from the green tea polyphenol,epigallocatechin 3-gallate[J].Redox Biology,2014,2:187-195.
[4] 汪水平,彭希豪,牛有军,等.葡萄籽提取物原花青素对肉兔屠宰性能与肉质的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2014,45(7):1135-1141.
[5] 周华,王钢,梁璐,等.原花青素对青脚麻肉鸡生产性能、养分利用和免疫器官的影响研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2013,49(17):63-65.
[6] ZHAO J X,LI Q,ZHANG R X,et al.Effect of dietary grape pomace on growth performance,meat quality and antioxidant activity in ram lambs[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2018,236:76-85.
[7] 牟春堂,郝小燕,刘笑梅,等.葡多酚对绵羊瘤胃体外发酵参数及微生物区系的影响[J].动物营养学报,2020,32(1):302-309.
[8] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].2版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.
[9] 晁娅梅,陈代文,余冰,等.茶多酚对育肥猪生长性能、抗氧化能力、胴体品质和肉品质的影响[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(12):3996-4005.
[10] 王凯,王洋,孙娟娟,等.苜蓿和红车轴草黄酮提取物对绵羊生长性能和血液相关指标的影响[J].中国兽医学报,2017,37(4):704-709.
[11] 金亚倩,郝松华,赵俊星,等.日粮中添加葡萄皮渣对绵羊生长性能、器官指数及血液生化指标的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2016,43(9):2326-2332.
[12] 张鹏,孙占鹏,张雪山,等.葡萄籽粉替代玉米对成年母羊体重和经济效益的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2013,40(4):245-247.
[13] 何英霞,黄林鑫,夏克定,等.葡萄籽原花青素对欧洲鳗鲡生长及机体抗氧化能力影响的初步研究[J].饲料研究,2019,42(7):20-23.
[14] 潘发明,李发弟,郝正里,等.茶渣单宁含量对绵羊养分消化利用与氮代谢参数的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2012,43(1):71-81.
[15] 薛树媛.灌木类植物单宁对绵羊瘤胃发酵影响及其对瘤胃微生物区系、免疫和生产指标影响的研究[D].硕士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2011.
[16] 赵梦迪,邸凌峰,唐泽宇,等.单宁与饲用纤维素酶对湖羊瘤胃微生物菌群的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2019,46(1):112-122.
[17] 缪冰旋.野生葡萄及葡萄酒抗氧化活性和抗菌性研究[D].硕士学位论文.广州:暨南大学,2014.
[18] 付丽,卢文青,周晓敏.番荔枝酚类提取物的抗菌抗氧化作用[J].热带医学杂志,2016,16(4):460-463.
[19] 侯福银,杨智青,陈长宽,等.原花青素对肉鸡肠道及屠宰性能、脂质代谢和肉品质的影响[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2019,45(1):119-125.
[20] 肖玉琪,张有法,杨若飞,等.绵羊眼肌面积近似计算公式法初探[J].中国草食动物,2003(增刊1):117-118.
[21] 赵艳兵,任有蛇,张春香,等.日粮中添加荞麦秸秆对绵羊屠宰性能、器官指数、肉品质及血液生化指标的影响[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,37(12):872-878.
[22] 张佩,ABEDIN A,孙泽威.通脉颗粒药渣对杜寒杂交母羊屠宰性能、器官指数及瘤胃发酵参数的影响[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,34(4):610-616.
[23] 田华勤.葡萄渣提取物和亚麻籽油对湖羊羔羊生产性能和养分消化代谢的影响[D].硕士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2016.
[24] 冯仰廉.论生产优质牛肉的科学饲养[J].饲料广角,2001(22):1-3.
[25] CROSS H R,DURLAND P R,SEIDEMAN S C.Sensory qualities of meat[M]//BECHTEL P J.Muscle as food.Orlando:Academic Press,1986:279-320.
[26] 张俊英,王德宝.自然放牧条件下不同肋骨数乌珠穆沁肉羊屠宰性能与肉品质分析[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2019(16):52-55.
[27] 徐玉婷,董华发,曾晓房,等.肉品品质评定方法研究进展[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2017,8(6):1967-1972.
[28] 王艳萍,石长青,曾维斌,等.石歧肉鸽肉质特性的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2012,48(13):10-13.
[29] O'GRADY M N,CARPENTER R,LYNCH P B,et al.Addition of grape seed extract and bearberry to porcine diets:influence on quality attributes of raw and cooked pork[J].Meat Science,2008,78(4):438-446.

[30] 王永辉,马俪珍.肌肉颜色变化的机理及其控制方法初探[J].肉类工业,2006(4):18-21.
[31] 杨蓉,林鹏飞,吴光松,等.不同养殖模式对柯乐猪肌红蛋白含量和肉色的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2019(8):48-50.
[32] 李光全,邓位喜,李佳剑,等.务川黑牛不同杂交组合屠宰性能及肉质研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2019,55(7):63-66.
[33] 赵俊星,刘向东,金亚倩,等.日粮中添加酿酒葡萄渣对绵羊肉品质及肌肉抗氧化性的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2017,48(8):1481-1490.
[34] LEE S H,JOO S T,RYU Y C.Skeletal muscle fiber type and myofibrillar proteins in relation to meat quality[J].Meat Science,2010,86(1):166-170.

[35] 许铭洙,张勇,严鸿林,等.大豆异黄酮对骨骼肌发育的影响及其对动物肉品质的调控作用[J].中国畜牧杂志,2019,55(6):15-19,163.
[36] 李丽.茶多酚对高DDGS日粮肉鸡生长性能、肉品质及脂质代谢的影响[D].硕士学位论文.杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.
[37] 蔡海莹.茶多酚和维生素E对肥育猪生产性能及其肉品质的影响[D]硕士学位论文.合肥:安徽农业大学,2006.
[38] 姜婧,陈雁,张海莉,等.原花青素对铅诱导大鼠肝损伤的保护作用[J].中国兽医科学,2016,46(5):664-670.
[39] 汪水平,杨大盛,李艳莎,等.葡萄籽提取物原花青素对肉兔抗氧化功能、脂质含量及血清代谢产物浓度的影响[J].中国粮油学报,2014,29(10):72-76,82.
[40] 赵家奇,郝瑞荣,高俊杰,等.葡萄籽原花青素对断奶仔猪免疫力和抗氧化功能的影响[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,36(10):735-739.
[41] WU S S,YANO S,CHEN J H,et al.Polyphenols from Lonicera caerulea L. berry inhibit LPS-induced inflammation through dual modulation of inflammatory and antioxidant mediators[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2017,65(25):5133-5141.

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References