Effects of Low-Protein Diet Supplemented with Fermented Broussonetia papyrifera on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Meat Quality of Finishing Pigs

  • SONG Bo ,
  • ZHENG Changbing ,
  • ZHONG Yinzhao ,
  • TIAN Mengli ,
  • WU Maisheng ,
  • YANG Qi ,
  • ZHU Shaozhong ,
  • ZHANG Xing ,
  • LI Fengna ,
  • DUAN Yehui ,
  • YIN Yulong
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process of Hunan, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China;
    2. College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;
    3. Xiangtan Agricultural and Countryside of Bureau, Xiangtan 411104, China;
    4. Xiangtan Huayang Broussonetia Papyrifera Industry Development Limited Company, Xiangtan 411228, China;
    5. Animal Breeding Station of Xiangtan, Xiangtan 411104, China

Received date: 2020-04-26

  Online published: 2020-10-22

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of low-protein diet supplemented with fermented Broussonetia papyrifera (FBP) on growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of finishing pigs. Twenty-eight healthy finishing pigs with similar body weight [(63.53±0.40) kg] were randomly assigned into the following four groups (n=7): normal protein diet group, dietary crude protein content was 16%; low-protein diet group, dietary crude protein content was 13%; Broussonetia papyrifera powder (BPP) group, diet supplemented with 10% BPP and dietary crude protein content was 13%; FBP group, diet supplemented with 10% FBP and dietary crude protein content was 13%. The pre-experimental period lasted for 7 days, and the experimental period lasted for 45 days. The results showed as follows: 1) different dietary treatments had no significant effects on the growth performance of finishing pigs (P>0.05). 2) Compared with the normal protein diet group, the lean meat percentage of finishing pigs in low-protein diet group was not significantly changed (P>0.05), but the average backfat thickness (+18.18%) and fat percentage (+23.48%) were significant increased (P<0.05), and they could restore the level of normal protein diet group when low-protein diet supplemented with 10% BPP or FBP. 3) Compared with the low-protein diet group, the lean meat percentage of finishing pigs in BPP group was significantly reduced, while those in the FBP group had no significant changes (P>0.05). 4) Compared with the normal protein diet group, the liver weight in the low-protein diet group and FBP group was significantly reduced (P<0.05), while the heart weight and spleen weight were not significantly different among the groups (P>0.05). 5) Compared with the normal protein diet group, low-protein diet supplemented with 10% FBP had a tendency to reduce the serum urea nitrogen content (-35.63%, P=0.07). 6) Compared with the normal protein diet group, low-protein diet supplemented with 10% BPP significantly increased the shear force (+22.85%, P<0.05) and decreased the redness (a*) value (-22.52%, P<0.05) of longissimus dorsi muscle, and significantly increased the intramuscular fat content (+24.54%, P<0.05). 7) Compared with the normal protein diet group, the contents of isoleucine, methionine, tyrosine and α-aminoadipic acid in soleus muscle in the BPP group were decreased by 18.62%, 35.62%, 23.76% and 35.38% (P<0.05), respectively , and the contents of histidine, arginine, glycine, taurine, β-aminoisobutyric acid in longissimus dorsi muscle and the content of alanine in soleus muscle in the FBP group were increased by 45.20%, 30.87%, 43.00%, 20.64%, 40.52% and 31.42% (P<0.05), respectively. In conclusion, low-protein diet supplemented with 10% FBP exerts no negative effects on the growth performance of finishing pigs, but can reduce the serum urea nitrogen content and average backfat thickness, and increase the contents of intramuscular fat and amino acids in muscle, thus improving the flavor and nutritional value of meat. The feeding effects of FBP are better than those of BPP.

Cite this article

SONG Bo , ZHENG Changbing , ZHONG Yinzhao , TIAN Mengli , WU Maisheng , YANG Qi , ZHU Shaozhong , ZHANG Xing , LI Fengna , DUAN Yehui , YIN Yulong . Effects of Low-Protein Diet Supplemented with Fermented Broussonetia papyrifera on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Meat Quality of Finishing Pigs[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020 , 32(10) : 4841 -4851 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.10.035

References

[1] 蔡玉,陈国顺,支喜军,等.构树发酵饲料在猪禽养殖中的应用研究进展[J].畜牧兽医杂志,2019,38(1):41-45.
[2] 彭皓,赵婉雨.杂交构树产业技术分析报告[J].高科技与产业化,2019(4):48-66.
[3] 李兰海,王自蕊,游金明,等.构树叶在畜禽生产中的研究进展[J].饲料工业,2018,39(1):24-26.
[4] 刘兆阳.杂交构树的营养功能及其在畜禽中的应用[J].饲料研究,2019,42(1):121-122.
[5] 屠焰,刁其玉,张蓉,等.杂交构树叶的饲用营养价值分析[J].草业科学,2009,26(6):136-139.
[6] 王永树,江浩,谢先中.构树叶饲喂巴马香猪的效果试验[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2016(20):194-195.
[7] 夏中生,何国英,廖志超,等.构树叶粉用作生长肥育猪饲料的营养价值评价[J].粮食与饲料工业,2008(12):37-38.
[8] 杨青春,陈绍红,刘铀.构树叶对育肥猪生产性能、肉品质及营养物质表观消化率的影响[J].河南农业科学,2014,43(7):133-137.
[9] 宋博,尹杰,郑昌炳,等.低蛋白质日粮在畜禽生产中的应用研究进展[J].中国饲料,2020(3):8-15.
[10] LI Y H,LIU Y Y,LI F N,et al.Effects of dietary ramie powder at various levels on carcass traits and meat quality in finishing pigs[J].Meat Science,2018,143:52-59.
[11] LIU Y Y,LI Y H,PENG Y L,et al.Dietary mulberry leaf powder affects growth performance,carcass traits and meat quality in finishing pigs[J].Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition,2019,103(6):1934-1945.  
[12] 张兴,朱少中,杨旗,等.构树发酵饲料对湘沙猪配套系商品猪生长性能、胴体品质和肌肉品质的影响[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(12):5760-5771.
[13] 陈亚静, 付雪林, 倪德斌,等.猪肌肉肌内脂肪测定方法的比较[J].华中农业大学学报,2015,34(4):84-88.
[14] 黄新,郑开之,郑会超,等.杂交构树的生物产量、营养动态及生态价值[J].粮食与饲料工业,2019(9):44-48.
[15] 林萌萌,何振刚,郑爱华,等.全株发酵杂交构树替代蛋白饲料对育肥猪生长性能、粪污排放量及养分表观消化率的影响[J].饲料研究,2019,42(4):29-32.
[16] 王宇波,许豆豆,何鑫,等.低蛋白饲粮缬氨酸水平对肥育猪生长性能、胴体性状和肉品质的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2019,50(9):1832-1840.
[17] 沈斐斐,陆伦根.肝脏碱性磷酸酶:胆汁淤积和胆道损伤的标志物[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2016,32(5):1026-1030.
[18] 胡新旭,周映华,卞巧,等.无抗发酵饲料对生长育肥猪生产性能、血液生化指标和肉品质的影响[J].华中农业大学学报,2015,34(1):72-77.
[19] KERR B J,MCKEITH F K,EASTER R A.Effect on performance and carcass characteristics of nursery to finisher pigs fed reduced crude protein,amino acid-supplemented diets[J].Journal of Animal Science,1995,73(2):433-440.  
[20] SUÁREZ-BELLOCH J,LATORRE M A,GUADA J A.The effect of protein restriction during the growing period on carcass,meat and fat quality of heavy barrows and gilts[J].Meat Science,2016,112:16-23.
[21] 李海新.发酵构树叶对生长猪营养物质消化率、肥育性能、屠宰性能及肉质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.湛江:广东海洋大学,2010.
[22] ROSENVOLD K,ANDERSEN H J.Factors of significance for pork quality-a review[J].Meat Science,2003,64(3):219-237.  
[23] 尹靖东.动物肌肉生物学与肉品科学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2011.
[24] FLORES M,ARMERO E,ARISTOY M C,et al.Sensory characteristics of cooked pork loin as affected by nucleotide content and post-mortem meat quality[J].Meat Science,1999,51(1):53-59.  
[25] WOOD J D,BROWN S N,NUTE G R,et al.Effects of breed,feed level and conditioning time on the tenderness of pork[J].Meat Science,1996,44(1/2):105-112.
[26] 唐亮.饲粮中构树叶粉对生长肥育猪生产性能、胴体品质、血清生化指标及养分消化率的影响[D].博士学位论文.南宁:广西大学,2008.
[27] EBARB S M,PHELPS K J,DROUILLARD J S,et al.Effects of anabolic implants and ractopamine-HCl on muscle fiber morphometrics,collagen solubility,and tenderness of beef longissimus lumborum steaks[J].Journal of Animal Science,2017,95(3):1219-1231.
[28] LUCIANO G,MONAHAN F J,VASTA V,et al.Dietary tannins improve lamb meat colour stability[J].Meat Science,2009,80(7):120-125.
[29] 彭海龙,江书忠,罗平成.构树在养猪生产上的应用研究[J].饲料博览,2018(12):52-58.
[30] LI Y H,LI F N,DUAN Y H,et al.Low-protein diet improves meat quality of growing and finishing pigs through changing lipid metabolism,fiber characteristics,and free amino acid profile of the muscle[J].Journal of Animal Science,2018,96(8):3221-3232.  
[31] 陈国顺.子午岭野家杂种猪和合作猪肉质特性比较及风味挥发性成分的提取与分析[D].博士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2004.
Outlines

/