RESEARCH PAPER

Effects of Different Processing Methods on Nutritional Value of Degreasing Camphor Branches and Leaves

  • WANG Long ,
  • YANG Lei ,
  • XU Lanjiao ,
  • YANG Yuling ,
  • LI Huoping ,
  • LIU Lei ,
  • QU Mingren ,
  • LIANG Huan
Expand
  • 1. Jiangxi Province Engineering Research Center of Feed Development, Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China;
    2. Animal Nutrition and Feed Safety Innovation Team, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China;
    3. Woody Spice (East China) Engineering Technology Research Center of National Forestry and Grass Administration, Forestry College of Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China;
    4. Agriculture, Rural and Grain Bureau of Yushui District, Xinyu City, Xinyu 338000, China

Received date: 2022-05-07

  Online published: 2022-11-14

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effects of different processing methods on the nutritional value of degreasing camphor branches and leaves using Cornell net carbohydrate-protein system (CNCPS) method and rumen in vitro fermentation method. The single factor design was used in the experiment, and four groups were set up, namely natural drying group (control group), artificial drying group, pellet feed group and silage fermentation group, each group contained four replicates. The effects of different processing methods on the nutritional components, the carbohydrate (CHO) components in CNCPS and the rumen in vitro fermentation parameters of degreasing camphor branches and leaves were analyzed. The results showed that:1) the crude protein (CP) and acid washing insoluble protein (NDIP) contents of the pellet feed group were significantly higher than those of other groups (P<0.05), and the neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) contents were significantly lower than those of other groups (P<0.05). The crude ash (Ash) content of silage fermentation group was significantly higher than that of natural drying group and pellet feed group (P<0.05), and the water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content was significantly higher than that of other groups (P<0.05). The starch content of natural drying group was significantly lower than that of other groups (P<0.05). 2) The rapidly degraded carbohydrate (CA), moderately degraded carbohydrate (CB1) and non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) contents of pellet feed group were significantly higher than those of other groups (P<0.05), and the CHO and non-degraded carbohydrate (CC) contents were significantly lower than those of other groups (P<0.05). The slowly degraded carbohydrate (CB2) content of artificial drying group was significantly higher than that of natural drying group and silage fermentation group (P<0.05). 3) The in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) concentrations of natural drying group were significantly lower than those of other groups (P<0.05), the microbial protein (MCP) concentration was significantly lower than that of artificial drying group and silage fermentation group (P<0.05), and the acetic acid/propionic acid (A/P) value was significantly higher than that of other groups (P<0.05). The IVDMD of pellet feed group was significantly higher than that of other groups (P<0.05), and the NH3-N and TVFA concentrations were significantly higher than that of artificial drying group and silage fermentation group (P<0.05). To sum up, comprehensive the results of conventional nutritional components, CHO components in CNCPS and in vitro fermentation parameters, the artificial drying, granulation and silage treatments can improve the nutritional value of degreasing camphor branches and leaves, and the granulation treatment effect is the best.

Cite this article

WANG Long , YANG Lei , XU Lanjiao , YANG Yuling , LI Huoping , LIU Lei , QU Mingren , LIANG Huan . Effects of Different Processing Methods on Nutritional Value of Degreasing Camphor Branches and Leaves[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022 , 34(11) : 7282 -7290 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2022.11.046

References

[1] 张国防, 陈存及, 邢建宏, 等.芳樟工业原料林营建中的若干问题[J].林业科技开发, 2004, 18(3):7-10. ZHANG G F, CHEN C J, XING J H, et al.Discussion on plantation of industrial material forest of Cinnamomum camphora for linalool[J].China Forestry Science and Technology, 2004, 18(3):7-10.(in Chinese)
[2] 章亚芳.矮化芳樟叶和小枝挥发油的提取工艺及其成分分析研究[D].硕士学位论文.南昌:南昌大学, 2012. ZHANG Y F.Study on process and component analysis for volatile oil extraction from dwarf aromatic camphor leaves and twigs[D].Master's Thesis.Nanchang:Nanchang University, 2012.(in Chinese)
[3] 王隆, 李璟怡, 欧阳可寒, 等.不同青贮添加剂对去油芳樟枝叶青贮饲料营养成分、青贮发酵品质和瘤胃体外发酵特性的影响[J].动物营养学报, 2022, 34(3):1789-1799. WANG L, LI J Y, OUYANG K H, et al.Effects of different silage additives on nutrient composition, silage fermentation quality and rumen fermentation characteristics in vitro of deoiling linalyl branches and leaves silage[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34(3):1789-1799.
[4] 隋美霞.产气法和CNCPS法对粗饲料营养评价的比较研究[D].硕士学位论文.哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2009. SUI M X.Comparative study on nutritional evaluation of roughages by gas production technique and CNCPS[D].Master's Thesis.Harbin:Northeast Agricultural University, 2009.(in Chinese)
[5] CHAVES A V, BROOKES I M, WAGHORN G C, et al.Evaluation of Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system predictions of milk production, intake and liveweight change of grazing dairy cows fed contrast silages[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2006, 144(1):85-91.  
[6] TYLUTKI T P, FOX D G, DURBAL V M, et al.Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system:a model for precision feeding of dairy cattle[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2008, 143(1/2/3/4):174-202.
[7] HUHTANEN P, SEPPÄLÄ A, OTS M, et al.In vitro gas production profiles to estimate extent and effective first-order rate of neutral detergent fiber digestion in the rumen[J].Journal of Animal Science, 2008, 86(3):651-659.  
[8] MENKE K H, STEINGASS H.Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid[J].Animal Research Development, 1988, 28:7-55.
[9] 卢德勋.反刍动物营养学发展现代化进程的回顾及其展望[J].饲料工业, 2010(S2):1-5. LU D X.Historical perspectives of the modernization development in ruminant nutrition[J].Feed Industry, 2010(S2):1-5.(in Chinese)
[10] 程茂基.绵羊瘤胃内寡肽的产生、降解、吸收、流通与微生物摄取规律的研究[D].博士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2000. CHENG M J.Study on the production, degradation, absorption, circulation and microbial intake of oligopeptides in the rumen of sheep[D].Ph.D.Thesis.Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2000.(in Chinese)
[11] VAN SOEST P J, ROBERTSON J B, LEWIS B A.Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74(10):3583-3597.  
[12] AOAC International.Official methods of analysis of AOAC international[M].16th ed.Arlington:AOAC International, 1995.
[13] DUBOIS M, GILLES K A, HAMILTON J K, et al.Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances[J].Analytical Chemistry, 1956, 28(3):350-356.  
[14] 徐生阳, 谢艺潇, 李文麒, 等.不同料型草产品对羊草营养成分、康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系碳水化合物组分及体外消化的影响[J].动物营养学报, 2020, 32(11):5341-5346. XU S Y, XIE Y X, LI W Q, et al.Effects of different types of grass products on nutrient composition, carbohydrate composition of Cornell net carbohydrate-protein system and in vitro digestion of Leymus chinensis[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020, 32(11):5341-5346.(in Chinese)
[15] 徐生阳, 玉柱.天然牧草不同草产品形式之间营养性差异研究[J].饲料工业, 2020, 41(15):34-38. XU S Y, YU Z.The differences between different natural forage products[J].Feed Industry, 2020, 41(15):34-38.(in Chinese)
[16] 李雅斐.玉米和紫花苜蓿混合青贮对营养价值和品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2019. LI Y F.Effects of mixed silage of corn and alfalfa on nutritional value and quality[D].Master's Thesis.Yangling:Northwest A&F University, 2019.(in Chinese)
[17] 范逸婷, 齐钦, 付彤, 等.花生秧与麦秸对荷斯坦奶牛瘤胃降解率及营养物质消化率的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志, 2021, 57(12):186-191. FAN Y T, QI Q, FU T, et al.Effects of peanut vine and wheat straw on rumen degradability and nutrient digestibility of Holstein cows[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2021, 57(12):186-191.(in Chinese)
[18] SNIFFEN C J, O'CONNOR J D, VAN SOEST P J, et al.A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets:Ⅱ.Carbohydrate and protein availability[J].Journal of Animal Science, 1992, 70(11):3562-3577.  
[19] 王一强, 吕静仪, 程传腾, 等.基于康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系法和尼龙袋法评价工业大麻副产物的营养价值[J].动物营养学报, 2021, 33(11):6474-6482. WANG Y Q, LV J Y, CHENG C T, et al.Nutritional value of industrial hemp by-product evaluated by Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system and nylon bag method[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(11):6474-6482.(in Chinese)
[20] AQUINO D L, TEDESCHI L O, LANZAS C, et al.Evaluation of CNCPS predictions of milk production of dairy cows fed alfalfa silage[C]//Proceedings-Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers.Ithaca:Cornell Nutrition Conference Committee, 2008:137-150.
[21] RUIZ R, TEDESCHL L O, MARINI J C, et al.The effect of a ruminal nitrogen (N) deficiency in dairy cows:evaluation of the Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system ruminal N deficiency adjustment[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2002, 85(11):2986-2999.  
[22] 陈艳, 王之盛, 张晓明, 等.常用粗饲料营养成分和饲用价值分析[J].草业学报, 2015, 24(5):117-125. CHEN Y, WANG Z S, ZHANG X M, et al.Analysis of the nutritional components and feeding values of commonly used roughages[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(5):117-125.(in Chinese)
[23] SCHLUTTENHOFER C, YUAN L.Challenges towards revitalizing hemp:a multifaceted crop[J].Trends in Plant Science, 2017, 22(11):917-929.  
[24] CALSAMIGLIA S, FERRET A, DEVANT M.Effects of pH and pH fluctuations on microbial fermentation and nutrient flow from a dual-flow continuous culture system[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2002, 85(3):574-579.  
[25] 李苗苗, 靳思玉, 王立超, 等.不同温度下添加乳酸菌对油莎草青贮品质及体外干物质消失率的影响[J].动物营养学报, 2020, 32(2):827-835. LI M M, JIN S Y, WANG L C, et al.Effects of lactic acid bacteria addition on fermentation quality and dry matter digestibility of Cyperus esculentus silage under different temperatures[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020, 32(2):827-835.(in Chinese)
[26] 王莹.内蒙古荒漠草原主要植物养分含量、体外消化及产气特征研究[D].硕士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2019. WANG Y.In study on nutrient content, in vitro digestion and gas production characteristics of main plants in Inner Mongolia desert steppe[D].Master's Thesis.Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2019.(in Chinese)
[27] 于忠升, 张爱忠, 姜宁, 等.全价颗粒饲料在羊生产中的应用[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2018(20):154-156. YU Z S, ZHANG A Z, JIANG N, et al.The application of full-price pellet feed in sheep production[J].Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2018(20):154-156.(in Chinese)
[28] WANAPAT M, PIMPA O.Effect of ruminal NH3-N levels on ruminal fermentation, purine derivatives, digestibility and rice straw intake in swamp buffaloes[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 1999, 12(6):904-907.  
[29] SILVEIRA C, OBA M, YANG W Z, et al.Selection of barley grain affects ruminal fermentation, starch digestibility, and productivity of lactating dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2007, 90(6):2860-2869.  
[30] ROGERS J A, DAVIS C L.Rumen volatile fatty acid production and nutrient utilization in steers fed a diet supplemented with sodium bicarbonate and monensin[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 1982, 65(6):944-952.  
[31] 熊本海, 卢德勋, 张子仪.瘤胃乙酸与丙酸摩尔比例的改变对瘤胃发酵及血液指标的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报, 2002, 33(6):537-543. XIONG B H, LU D X, ZHANG Z Y.Effect of changing the molar ratio of acetate to propionate in rumen fluid on rumen fermentation and some blood indexes[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2002, 33(6):537-543.(in Chinese)
[32] BLAXTER K L, CLAPPERTON J L.Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants[J].British Journal of Nutrition, 1965, 19(4):511-522.
[33] GUILLOTEAU P, TOULLEC R, GRONGNET J F, et al.Digestion of milk, fish and soya-bean protein in the preruminant calf:flow of digesta, apparent digestibility at the end of the ileum and amino acid composition of ileal digesta[J].British Journal of Nutrition, 1986, 55(3):571-592.  
Outlines

/